Showing posts with label cross-sales. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cross-sales. Show all posts
Monday, November 25, 2013
Zions Bank Continues to Improve Onboarding Process by Expanding Channels and Touches
Instead of simply sending a single letter to new account openers to thank them for their business, Zions Bank has expanded their onboarding program to include a 30 day 'engagement' mailing and a 60 day 'cross-sell' mailing. In addition, they utilize their centralized call center for follow-up and reach all new customers with email to reinforce the written communication. This integrated focus towards new customer communication has resulted in a significant reduction in new customer attrition and enhanced cross-sales of services.
Friday, November 22, 2013
Growth in Deposits Presents Opportunities and Risks
The American Banker today had an article detailing the recent trend of low cost deposit growth experienced by the major banks in the fourth quarter of 2009. According to KBW Inc.'s Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, the top 40 banks experienced a deposit growth rate of 8% in the quarter, with only a couple large banks intentionally allowing higher-cost deposits inherited during acquisitions to run off during the year.
Even though interest rates remain extremely low, consumers were still saving at a rate of 4.7% as a percentage of disposable income in November, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis primarily due to uncertainties in the marketplace and due to the view of banks being the safe harbor for funds accumulated during a time of reduced spending.
While bank revenues will not return to high levels until consumers begin to borrow again, productive deposit gathering should help banks lessen the impact of the Obama administration's proposed "financial crisis responsibility fee," which would subtract government-insured deposits from the covered liabilities on which the 15 basis-point tax would be based.
There is an opportunity and risk associated with this deposit growth however. For banks that have well developed onboarding and cross-sell programs in place, this deposit growth and the resultant increase in new accounts provides a tremendous foundation for developing long term relationships with an enhanced ROI. In addition, with households continually evaluating where to place their funds, firms with aggressive aquisition programs will benefit the most.
Conversely, those organizations who become complacent during this time of deposit growth could risk seeing the deposit growth over the past 15 months evaporate, moving either to other banking organizations or eventually to the equity markets as the economy grows stronger. I am recommending that my clients continue to focus on deposit acquisition programs and reach out to those new households they have recently acquired or households who have expanded their relationship and further secure the relationship through insight gathering, engagement programs and improved retention processes.
Eventually, it is expected that consumers will become more confident and will seek additional investment and savings options. When this occurs, it will be those organizations with the best customer experience and strongest relationships that will lose the least.
Even though interest rates remain extremely low, consumers were still saving at a rate of 4.7% as a percentage of disposable income in November, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis primarily due to uncertainties in the marketplace and due to the view of banks being the safe harbor for funds accumulated during a time of reduced spending.
While bank revenues will not return to high levels until consumers begin to borrow again, productive deposit gathering should help banks lessen the impact of the Obama administration's proposed "financial crisis responsibility fee," which would subtract government-insured deposits from the covered liabilities on which the 15 basis-point tax would be based.
There is an opportunity and risk associated with this deposit growth however. For banks that have well developed onboarding and cross-sell programs in place, this deposit growth and the resultant increase in new accounts provides a tremendous foundation for developing long term relationships with an enhanced ROI. In addition, with households continually evaluating where to place their funds, firms with aggressive aquisition programs will benefit the most.
Conversely, those organizations who become complacent during this time of deposit growth could risk seeing the deposit growth over the past 15 months evaporate, moving either to other banking organizations or eventually to the equity markets as the economy grows stronger. I am recommending that my clients continue to focus on deposit acquisition programs and reach out to those new households they have recently acquired or households who have expanded their relationship and further secure the relationship through insight gathering, engagement programs and improved retention processes.
Eventually, it is expected that consumers will become more confident and will seek additional investment and savings options. When this occurs, it will be those organizations with the best customer experience and strongest relationships that will lose the least.
Building Long-Term Deposits and Relationships Automatically
Over the past several years there have been a number of financial institutions that have built automatic savings programs where customers can set goals, establish recurring transfers between accounts to fund the goal(s), and track their savings progress.
One of the first programs developed was the Orange Savings Account from ING Direct which greatly simplified the process of opening new accounts for various savings goals. Following the success of the Orange Saving Account, SmartyPig was another program with that same goal in mind, making it easy for a customer to setup savings goals.
A customer can name their accounts, set the deadline for reaching their goals and even use an interactive calculator to determine the amount they will need to set aside each month. What makes Smartypig unique is that they added a social element to the mix . . . allowing other people such as friends and family members to contribute to the customer's goals as well.
The customer can even place a widget on their Facebook or MySpace page. Once the customer reaches their goal, they can either put all of your savings plus interest on a debit card, have it sent back to their bank, or receive bonuses by having the amount placed on a gift card from participating merchants like Macys, Amazon, Best Buy, etc.
While SmartyPig brings unique technology to its enterprise, it remains a one trick piggy (offering only savings accounts) and is a still-small Internet start-up. Being able to grow a savings account product from $0 to $500 million in deposits in less than two years is a phenomenal feat but its success can be assailed.
Full-service banks have begun to copy some of SmartyPig’s basic features and leveraged their own new savings features. For instance, U.S. Bank introduced the S.T.A.R.T. (“Savings Today And Rewards Tomorrow”) program in late 2009 in test markets, giving a $50 Visa gift card to a customer depositing $1,000 or more into a U.S. Bancorp money market savings account and establishing a monthly transfer from their U.S. Bank checking account. If a customer chooses to transfer between $.25 and $5.00 from their checking account into his money market savings account each time he uses his U.S. Bank debit or credit card, the S.T.A.R.T program counts those toward program term fulfillment.
In addition, customers maintaining a minimum $1,000 balance in the new savings account for 12 months will receive another $50 bonus, while U.S. Bank is offering another $100 bonus for establishing an automatically funding savings account tied to the bank’s standard checking account.
Building new products that encourage a long-term savings perspective supports the current trends toward more conservative money management while providing tremendous opportunity for additional cross-selling and relationship building. I fully expect more banks to develop both online and offline savings alternatives and to use these products as part of their onboarding and lifestage communication processes.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Capital One Continues to Innovate
Historically an aggressive marketer and innovator in the credit card industry, Captital One has expanded its reach in recent years, using their growing banking franchise as the foundation for introducing innovative banking products. In addition to having a relatively rich debit rewards program and expanding into online and small business banking, they have recently introduced a new savings product called "InterestPlus Online Savings".
The saving program offers an above market interest rate on balances over $2,500 in addition to a 10% quarterly interest bonus payment paid if the customer uses their Capital One credit card once a month.
The bonus can also be earned if the customer maintains a minimum balance of $15,000 each month. The bonus for using the credit card is similar to other promotions done by Captial One in the past 12-18 months to cross-sell services and relationships off their credit card foundation.
The promotion of the new service began in December of last year through the bank's web site, statement inserts, direct mail and with email according to Comperemedia. Using strong visual elements such as comparative bar graphs and icon buttons similar to what I have seen with ING mailings, it is clear that Capital One plans to leverage their strong marketing talents from the credit card industry in building a strong bank brand.
The saving program offers an above market interest rate on balances over $2,500 in addition to a 10% quarterly interest bonus payment paid if the customer uses their Capital One credit card once a month.
The bonus can also be earned if the customer maintains a minimum balance of $15,000 each month. The bonus for using the credit card is similar to other promotions done by Captial One in the past 12-18 months to cross-sell services and relationships off their credit card foundation.
The promotion of the new service began in December of last year through the bank's web site, statement inserts, direct mail and with email according to Comperemedia. Using strong visual elements such as comparative bar graphs and icon buttons similar to what I have seen with ING mailings, it is clear that Capital One plans to leverage their strong marketing talents from the credit card industry in building a strong bank brand.
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Large Banks Not Adequately Serving Small Businesses
While there is little denying the revenue potential of serving the financial needs of small businesses, there continues to be a significant disconnect between small business needs and the way large banks serve this segment according to a research report released today by Aite Group (Small Business Opportunities: Are Large Banks Missing the Boat?). And with the continuing financial crisis, availability of sophisticated cash management products to smaller banks and the significant negative press around large banks, this gap in expectations is widening. In fact, the percentage of large bank small business customers describing themselves as 'extremely satisfied' with their primary institution has dropped from 50% in 2007 to 33% in 2009. This has led to a shift of small businesses considering a community bank to be their primary financial institution from 24% in April 2006 to 35% in April 2009.
According to Christine Barry from Aite Group, the low satisfaction rates and disappointing cross-sell ratios are due in large part to large bank's failure to properly segment the small business market, thereby improving the understanding of the market. Without adequate segmentation and research, it is difficult to provide a personalized experience based on the small business' unique needs.
Another challenge is that it is difficult to even identify all small businesses since as many as two-thirds don't have business banking accounts according to a 2009 Javelin Strategy & Research report. These relationships may pay lower fees by being handled in the consumer platform initially, but they are quickly underserved as they grow and their needs expand to include payroll, specialized lending and enhanced cash management services.
One of the responses to this need to better understand the underserved small business banking customer is a shift in reporting structure at some large banks from being handled through the retail or commercial side of the bank to being handled by a standalone small business unit, where specific offline and online products can be developed and needs adequately researched. Another response has been the introduction of new services for this segment including scaled down cash management services, invoicing and payroll services and personal/business financial management products.
To win in the small business banking competition, it will be imperative to segment small businesses beyond a size categorization that neglects industry or needs segmentation. Data collection will also need to be enhanced since the amount of public information is much less reliable for small businesses than for retail customers. Finally, there needs to be constant direct communication with small businesses to demonstrate the desire to serve this segment and to provide ongoing leads for a better trained sales force.
According to Christine Barry from Aite Group, the low satisfaction rates and disappointing cross-sell ratios are due in large part to large bank's failure to properly segment the small business market, thereby improving the understanding of the market. Without adequate segmentation and research, it is difficult to provide a personalized experience based on the small business' unique needs.
Another challenge is that it is difficult to even identify all small businesses since as many as two-thirds don't have business banking accounts according to a 2009 Javelin Strategy & Research report. These relationships may pay lower fees by being handled in the consumer platform initially, but they are quickly underserved as they grow and their needs expand to include payroll, specialized lending and enhanced cash management services.
One of the responses to this need to better understand the underserved small business banking customer is a shift in reporting structure at some large banks from being handled through the retail or commercial side of the bank to being handled by a standalone small business unit, where specific offline and online products can be developed and needs adequately researched. Another response has been the introduction of new services for this segment including scaled down cash management services, invoicing and payroll services and personal/business financial management products.
To win in the small business banking competition, it will be imperative to segment small businesses beyond a size categorization that neglects industry or needs segmentation. Data collection will also need to be enhanced since the amount of public information is much less reliable for small businesses than for retail customers. Finally, there needs to be constant direct communication with small businesses to demonstrate the desire to serve this segment and to provide ongoing leads for a better trained sales force.
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Is Cash Really King?
The competition is again heating up in the checking account cash wars. In addition to banks that have traditionally offered cash incentives to open checking accounts such as JPMorgan Chase, Capital One, Fifth Third and PNC Bank, banks that in the past have offered premiums for the opening of new accounts like KeyBank are now also joining the money for checking acquisition game.
While incentives with some institutions are still $50-$75, many of the more aggressive institutions are offering rewards of $150-$200 to new customers that open accounts and meet some qualifying stipulations such as signing up for direct deposit, online billpay or a minimum number of signature debits. A recent program by Capital One offering $300 for a new account was the highest premium seen in years.
In a review of recent checking campaigns using the search service Mintel Comperemedia, more and more firms are offering the higher incentives. The question remains whether these high incentives pay off.
According to a 2009 study by Novantas, as many as 50% of new checking accounts are usually inactive when analyzed by looking at debit and credit transactions on the new account. In addition, the BAI has fielded many studies that find that as many as 30-40% of new accounts are closed during the first year. Unfortunately, many banks that I visit do not measure the new account activity level or rate of attrition as thoroughly as they measure the number of accounts that come in the front door. If measured using a full year view of the acquisition costs of new accounts, it is possible that some banks are paying double or triple their cash incentive for new relationships which may make the programs unprofitable from both a short and long term perspective.
It may be a more prudent strategy to reallocate this investment to strengthen current customer relationships through cross-sell and up-sell programs instead of attracting short-term, opportunistic customers with such high incentives.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
The Mobile Banking Response to Reg E
In a June 9 webinar entitled, Mobile Alerts and Reg E presented by Javelin Strategy & Research in conjunction with ClairMail, there was a great discussion of how mobile banking and financial alerts can play an integral role in both the opting-in process and the enhancement of the customer experience after August 15.
By providing enhanced information about the customers accounts and allowing the customer to be 'in control,' the perceived value of mobile banking can be enhanced. In addition, the ability to use mobile banking alerts to help avoid OD and NSF fees enhances the value of the device even more. It was mentioned that as many as 90% of customers who receive alerts will actually take action based on the alert (through signing on to their online banking account (33%), calling (33%) or visiting the branch (14%)).
The ways mobile banking can assist a customer would be real time alerts, real time account balances, two-way interactive alerts and transfers (like the Chase Bank introduction recently), and mobile PFM tools. In other words, mobile enables a highly personalized, proactive interaction with the bank when an overdraft occurs.
From the bank's perspective, Clairmail emphasized that the mobile channel enables banks to generate new revenue, increase satisfaction, drive adoption and retention and help to eliminate customer distrust of the bank thanks to enhanced transparency. In addition, the mobile channel can allow the bank to cross-sell overdraft solutions at the time the customer can relate the most . . . when they about to have a transaction rejected or a fee imposed.
By providing enhanced information about the customers accounts and allowing the customer to be 'in control,' the perceived value of mobile banking can be enhanced. In addition, the ability to use mobile banking alerts to help avoid OD and NSF fees enhances the value of the device even more. It was mentioned that as many as 90% of customers who receive alerts will actually take action based on the alert (through signing on to their online banking account (33%), calling (33%) or visiting the branch (14%)).
The ways mobile banking can assist a customer would be real time alerts, real time account balances, two-way interactive alerts and transfers (like the Chase Bank introduction recently), and mobile PFM tools. In other words, mobile enables a highly personalized, proactive interaction with the bank when an overdraft occurs.
From the bank's perspective, Clairmail emphasized that the mobile channel enables banks to generate new revenue, increase satisfaction, drive adoption and retention and help to eliminate customer distrust of the bank thanks to enhanced transparency. In addition, the mobile channel can allow the bank to cross-sell overdraft solutions at the time the customer can relate the most . . . when they about to have a transaction rejected or a fee imposed.
Mobile Banking Summit Illustrates Topic is Hot
You don't need to look any further than the attendee list to realize the importance of mobile banking to our industry. Not only is almost every major institution in attendance at this year's Mobile Banking and Emerging Applications Summit, but the number of participants has increased by more than 50% according to officials from SourceMedia.
The program kicked off Sunday with a workshop by David Eads, Founder & CEO of Mobile Strategy Partners LLC where he discussed the basics of getting a Mobile Banking strategy off the ground. He also shared the first of a wave of industry statistics that made it clear to the SRO attendees that this year and next will be pivotal to the mobile banking industry. He also shared keys to developing a business case for introducing mobile banking. He emphasized that while cost reduction (mainly from offloaded balance inquiry calls) could many time justify the investment in mobile banking by itself. a drop in attrition and an increase in revenue from increased interchange and cross-sales will also improve the ROI.
A parade of speakers including Pam Joseph and other players from U. S. Bank, Bob Hedges from Mercatus, several panel discussions, and Jeff Dennes from USAA provided an amazing array of customer research, case studies and predictions for the future of this channel. During the U.S. Bank presentation, there was discussion of a new Mobile Shopping Concierge application where coupons, offers and even store layouts may be provided and the discussion of upcoming introductions of both a Remote Deposit Capture application as well as a P2P application (probably the most discussed new application of the day from many organizations including Bank of the West).
The best line of the day came from Bob Hedges, who began his presentation of a ton of industry research by saying, "Making a business case for mobile banking is like making a business case for oxygen"! One of the more unusual moments came from 10-11 AM PT, when it was obvious many in attendance were using their phones (and a surprising number of iPads) to get immediate updates on today's speech by Steve Jobs. Another helpful use of phones came throughout the day when pictures were taken of the slides in the presentations by many since SourceMedia does not include the presentations in the conference materials, and then only partially share presentations 2-3 weeks after the event.
I will be digging much deeper into my notes over the next couple days to share insights from this great conference that ends tomorrow. In addition to key research, I will be sharing marketing ideas that were discussed as well as significant trends that we will probably see in 2010 and 2011.
By the way, for those unable to attend, the location of the conference was at the M Resort which was beautiful, but seemed like it was in LA due to the distance from the strip and the temperatures today approached 110 degrees. So yes, the conference was HOT!
The program kicked off Sunday with a workshop by David Eads, Founder & CEO of Mobile Strategy Partners LLC where he discussed the basics of getting a Mobile Banking strategy off the ground. He also shared the first of a wave of industry statistics that made it clear to the SRO attendees that this year and next will be pivotal to the mobile banking industry. He also shared keys to developing a business case for introducing mobile banking. He emphasized that while cost reduction (mainly from offloaded balance inquiry calls) could many time justify the investment in mobile banking by itself. a drop in attrition and an increase in revenue from increased interchange and cross-sales will also improve the ROI.
A parade of speakers including Pam Joseph and other players from U. S. Bank, Bob Hedges from Mercatus, several panel discussions, and Jeff Dennes from USAA provided an amazing array of customer research, case studies and predictions for the future of this channel. During the U.S. Bank presentation, there was discussion of a new Mobile Shopping Concierge application where coupons, offers and even store layouts may be provided and the discussion of upcoming introductions of both a Remote Deposit Capture application as well as a P2P application (probably the most discussed new application of the day from many organizations including Bank of the West).
The best line of the day came from Bob Hedges, who began his presentation of a ton of industry research by saying, "Making a business case for mobile banking is like making a business case for oxygen"! One of the more unusual moments came from 10-11 AM PT, when it was obvious many in attendance were using their phones (and a surprising number of iPads) to get immediate updates on today's speech by Steve Jobs. Another helpful use of phones came throughout the day when pictures were taken of the slides in the presentations by many since SourceMedia does not include the presentations in the conference materials, and then only partially share presentations 2-3 weeks after the event.
I will be digging much deeper into my notes over the next couple days to share insights from this great conference that ends tomorrow. In addition to key research, I will be sharing marketing ideas that were discussed as well as significant trends that we will probably see in 2010 and 2011.
By the way, for those unable to attend, the location of the conference was at the M Resort which was beautiful, but seemed like it was in LA due to the distance from the strip and the temperatures today approached 110 degrees. So yes, the conference was HOT!
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Onboarding Communication - How Much is Too Much
As I discuss multichannel new customer onboarding program development with financial organizations, it doesn't take long before the client asks about how much communication is too much early in a new relationship.
Interestingly, according to our research at Harland Clarke as well as research from J.D. Power, the number of new products sold and the customer satisfaction ratings both increase as the number of contacts increase during the first 90 days. In fact, according to J.D. Power, the average number of accounts sold increases from less than 2.5 to more than 3 if the customer is communicated with 4-7 times or more. In addition, the satisfaction ratings increase by more than 10% if more connections are made with the customer who opened up a new account.
Unfortunately, there are still several institutions who do not have a robust communications sequence with customers who open a new account, which impacts new customer engagement, cross-sell potential, customer satisfaction and even retention. For those banks that effectively reach out multiple times using email, phone, and direct mail, the results are consistently better across the board.
One of the strongest onboarding programs I am aware of is at a regional bank in the west. Their robust onboarding process proactively takes control of the customer experience for the entire first 90 days, stressing engagement and by offering products and services that are best matched to the customer's needs. The process begins at the new account desk, where there is a selling mentality but also an emphasis on collecting key information that will assist in future communication with the customer. Email addresses are collected from as many as 85% of customers opening new accounts, which is significantly above industry averages and which allows the bank the leverage for multi-channel communication throughout the entire customer lifecycle.
An initial email that is delivered in the first two days of the new relationship discussing what the customer can expect from their bank in the upcoming months are to provide key contact information if there is a problem. This is followed by a branch personalized Thank You letter with a series of engagement service offers. Subsequent communication (beyond standard debit card mailings, etc.) include a welcome call on day 15, an engagement reinforcement letter and email on day 30, and a cross-sell direct mail and email communication based on next most likely product modeling on the 60th day of the relationship.
The bank has found that the ability to offer integrated, multi-channel communication is critical in their quest to achieve the best engagement and sales results and to reach the highest levels of customer satisfaction. Delivering early, relevant and persistent communication has help them improve retention by more than 5%, significantly increase engagement levels and improve both cross-selling and balance build efforts compared to their control group. They achieve these results by 'touching' the new account opener 6-8 times during the first 60 days and by using personalized jump pages to enhance the experience.
While the planning and development for this program was definitely more extensive than a single touch welcome program, the return on investment using all metrics validated the effort.
How many contacts does your bank use to onboard new customers? What channels do you use to reach and engage the customer?
Interestingly, according to our research at Harland Clarke as well as research from J.D. Power, the number of new products sold and the customer satisfaction ratings both increase as the number of contacts increase during the first 90 days. In fact, according to J.D. Power, the average number of accounts sold increases from less than 2.5 to more than 3 if the customer is communicated with 4-7 times or more. In addition, the satisfaction ratings increase by more than 10% if more connections are made with the customer who opened up a new account.
Unfortunately, there are still several institutions who do not have a robust communications sequence with customers who open a new account, which impacts new customer engagement, cross-sell potential, customer satisfaction and even retention. For those banks that effectively reach out multiple times using email, phone, and direct mail, the results are consistently better across the board.
One of the strongest onboarding programs I am aware of is at a regional bank in the west. Their robust onboarding process proactively takes control of the customer experience for the entire first 90 days, stressing engagement and by offering products and services that are best matched to the customer's needs. The process begins at the new account desk, where there is a selling mentality but also an emphasis on collecting key information that will assist in future communication with the customer. Email addresses are collected from as many as 85% of customers opening new accounts, which is significantly above industry averages and which allows the bank the leverage for multi-channel communication throughout the entire customer lifecycle.
An initial email that is delivered in the first two days of the new relationship discussing what the customer can expect from their bank in the upcoming months are to provide key contact information if there is a problem. This is followed by a branch personalized Thank You letter with a series of engagement service offers. Subsequent communication (beyond standard debit card mailings, etc.) include a welcome call on day 15, an engagement reinforcement letter and email on day 30, and a cross-sell direct mail and email communication based on next most likely product modeling on the 60th day of the relationship.
The bank has found that the ability to offer integrated, multi-channel communication is critical in their quest to achieve the best engagement and sales results and to reach the highest levels of customer satisfaction. Delivering early, relevant and persistent communication has help them improve retention by more than 5%, significantly increase engagement levels and improve both cross-selling and balance build efforts compared to their control group. They achieve these results by 'touching' the new account opener 6-8 times during the first 60 days and by using personalized jump pages to enhance the experience.
While the planning and development for this program was definitely more extensive than a single touch welcome program, the return on investment using all metrics validated the effort.
How many contacts does your bank use to onboard new customers? What channels do you use to reach and engage the customer?
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Onboarding Needs to Reflect Bank Customers' Diverse Preferences and Needs
According to a new Javelin Strategy and Research report issued today, many banks are not leveraging the insight available early in a new relationship to develop customized offers and to utilize preferred channels of communication. In their study entitled, 2010 New Account Onboarding: Using a Systematic, Tactical Approach to Deepen Financial Customer Relationships, the importance of collecting key pieces of information such as age, income and the customer's previous banking experience is emphasized. With this baseline insight, Javelin proposes that communication channel determination and messaging can be improved, thereby leading to improved engagement, retention and cross-sell results.
The findings in the robust 44 page study are a refinement of a previous Javelin onboarding study from 1997 and are consistent with what I have found visiting and speaking with banks across the country. In fact, two of my clients (Zions Bank and KeyBank) are referenced in the study.
Both banks initially communicate with all new account openers, focusing on the engagement process, with an emphasis on online banking and bill pay, debit card utilization, direct deposit and more recently autosave and overdraft protection (in response to Reg. E). In addition, both banks leverage multiple channels for communication, including email, direct mail and either centralized or branch-based phone calling. At both institutions, segmentation of the customer base and the process of customized messaging and cross-selling is done after the more overarching process of getting the customer familiar with and engaged with their service. The collection of transaction history provides the foundation for leveraging propensity models to drive cross-selling later in the relationship.
While the Javelin study (which was based on research collected online) indicates that consumers prefer to receive email communication regarding their new account, research done with the majority of my clients show that results are enhanced when multiple communication channels are utilized (even for online account openers). These findings are not inconsistent, but reflect the online banking focus of the Javelin research. In fact, by leveraging personalized jump pages, online banking messaging, help/switch lines and even statement messaging and inserts, results can be further enhanced.
Additional recommendations from the Javelin research include establishing a paperless relationship at account opening and during onboarding (many banks I work with are building marketing programs around this objective) and collecting mobile phone numbers.
In conversations with Mark Schwanhausser, Senior Multi-Channel Financial Service Analyst for Javelin in the development of this report, he found it amazing that banks were not focusing on the collection of mobile numbers as part of the account opening process due to the significant number of households making their mobile phone their primary communication media and the increasing preference of data distribution via mobile channels (alerts). The collection of email addresses should also be a required component of the new account opening process even though many banks still do not leverage this channel effectively.
While an emphasis on a strong onboarding/welcome process seems to be universal throughout the industry, there are dozens, if not hundreds of ways to implement such as process when you take into account messaging, timing, channels, target audiences, etc. I am interested in onboarding success stories and additional insights you can share. Feel free to leave a comment or learnings on my blog.
The findings in the robust 44 page study are a refinement of a previous Javelin onboarding study from 1997 and are consistent with what I have found visiting and speaking with banks across the country. In fact, two of my clients (Zions Bank and KeyBank) are referenced in the study.
Both banks initially communicate with all new account openers, focusing on the engagement process, with an emphasis on online banking and bill pay, debit card utilization, direct deposit and more recently autosave and overdraft protection (in response to Reg. E). In addition, both banks leverage multiple channels for communication, including email, direct mail and either centralized or branch-based phone calling. At both institutions, segmentation of the customer base and the process of customized messaging and cross-selling is done after the more overarching process of getting the customer familiar with and engaged with their service. The collection of transaction history provides the foundation for leveraging propensity models to drive cross-selling later in the relationship.
While the Javelin study (which was based on research collected online) indicates that consumers prefer to receive email communication regarding their new account, research done with the majority of my clients show that results are enhanced when multiple communication channels are utilized (even for online account openers). These findings are not inconsistent, but reflect the online banking focus of the Javelin research. In fact, by leveraging personalized jump pages, online banking messaging, help/switch lines and even statement messaging and inserts, results can be further enhanced.
Additional recommendations from the Javelin research include establishing a paperless relationship at account opening and during onboarding (many banks I work with are building marketing programs around this objective) and collecting mobile phone numbers.
In conversations with Mark Schwanhausser, Senior Multi-Channel Financial Service Analyst for Javelin in the development of this report, he found it amazing that banks were not focusing on the collection of mobile numbers as part of the account opening process due to the significant number of households making their mobile phone their primary communication media and the increasing preference of data distribution via mobile channels (alerts). The collection of email addresses should also be a required component of the new account opening process even though many banks still do not leverage this channel effectively.
While an emphasis on a strong onboarding/welcome process seems to be universal throughout the industry, there are dozens, if not hundreds of ways to implement such as process when you take into account messaging, timing, channels, target audiences, etc. I am interested in onboarding success stories and additional insights you can share. Feel free to leave a comment or learnings on my blog.
Cross-Selling is Key to Bank Revenue Growth
As the banking world is shifting from a supply-side, product-driven environment to a demand-driven one, the focal point of this new model is the customer. As a result, banks are going to need to change their operating models to adapt and align to this new reality. Only then can banks deliver a truly innovative and compelling customer experience.
Part of this transformation will be to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) that measure long-term performance such as loyalty as well as shorter-term measures such as cross-sell effectiveness, customer satisfaction and household profitability. With as much as 30% of the bank's customer base potentially being vulnerable and 'in play' according to an Accenture survey of banking customers, banks must commit the resources needed for actionable customer segmentation, new pricing models, needs-based solutions and a way to reach customers effectively and efficiently to grow relationships.
As returns on equity have dropped precipitously, banks are now focusing on cross-selling to replace some of their profits and solidify relationships. In a recent Bloomberg Businessweek article entitled, Wells Fargo Pushes Cross-Sales to Replace Lost Growth, David Henry and Dakin Campbell discuss how the emphasis on cross-selling (which is not new) could be more effective at many organizations today since acquisitions by many banks have added millions of new customers to sell. For instance, Bank of America is hoping to persuade its 12 million customers to move funds to their newly acquired Merrill Lynch or for the Merrill Lynch clients to use more bank services. In addition, Wells Fargo is focusing on improving cross-selling at its Wachovia branches, where customers average 4.85 products per household compared to the much higher historical average at Wells.
As Stephen Steinour, CEO of Huntington Bancshares, said in a recent interview with analysts when asked about the importance of cross-selling at his bank, "there are not a lot of options". In fact, as the focus of the lead story in the most recent U.S. Banker magazine entitled Back from the Brink, Steinour and his team place cross-selling as the top priority at the bank, with a new CRM system being installed, additional employees being hired, Sunday branch hours being introduced, marketing spending increased and new incentive and measurement plans being put into place to reward customer relationship growth performance.
A number of banks I visit and clients of our company across the country have integrated cross-sell initiatives into marketing programs done quarterly, monthly or even daily based on customer behavior and events. Unlike the product-push promotions of the past, these programs leverage the modeled needs of the customer and flexibility of digital print to deliver messages to the customer that are based on their product propensity and recent activity. So, instead of promoting equity credit in September, many banks will be promoting a wide range of their services to individual segments of their customer base most likely to respond at a given time. Many of these banks are also leveraging all available communication channels (direct mail, email, phone, online banking, etc.) to support these efforts.
The key in all of these initiatives will be to make sure cross-selling is done for the benefit of the customer as opposed to simply reaching desired metrics. As many banks found out in the past, profitability is not automatically enhanced with an additional product sale. The focus needs to be on finding the correct solution for customer's needs which, in turn, will lead to an expanded relationship in dollars, services, and share of wallet.
How is your bank balancing the investment in cross-selling vs. acquisition marketing? Has there been a shift to either strategy in the past couple years at your bank? How do you view the future of acquisition and cross-sales?
Part of this transformation will be to develop key performance indicators (KPIs) that measure long-term performance such as loyalty as well as shorter-term measures such as cross-sell effectiveness, customer satisfaction and household profitability. With as much as 30% of the bank's customer base potentially being vulnerable and 'in play' according to an Accenture survey of banking customers, banks must commit the resources needed for actionable customer segmentation, new pricing models, needs-based solutions and a way to reach customers effectively and efficiently to grow relationships.
As returns on equity have dropped precipitously, banks are now focusing on cross-selling to replace some of their profits and solidify relationships. In a recent Bloomberg Businessweek article entitled, Wells Fargo Pushes Cross-Sales to Replace Lost Growth, David Henry and Dakin Campbell discuss how the emphasis on cross-selling (which is not new) could be more effective at many organizations today since acquisitions by many banks have added millions of new customers to sell. For instance, Bank of America is hoping to persuade its 12 million customers to move funds to their newly acquired Merrill Lynch or for the Merrill Lynch clients to use more bank services. In addition, Wells Fargo is focusing on improving cross-selling at its Wachovia branches, where customers average 4.85 products per household compared to the much higher historical average at Wells.
As Stephen Steinour, CEO of Huntington Bancshares, said in a recent interview with analysts when asked about the importance of cross-selling at his bank, "there are not a lot of options". In fact, as the focus of the lead story in the most recent U.S. Banker magazine entitled Back from the Brink, Steinour and his team place cross-selling as the top priority at the bank, with a new CRM system being installed, additional employees being hired, Sunday branch hours being introduced, marketing spending increased and new incentive and measurement plans being put into place to reward customer relationship growth performance.
A number of banks I visit and clients of our company across the country have integrated cross-sell initiatives into marketing programs done quarterly, monthly or even daily based on customer behavior and events. Unlike the product-push promotions of the past, these programs leverage the modeled needs of the customer and flexibility of digital print to deliver messages to the customer that are based on their product propensity and recent activity. So, instead of promoting equity credit in September, many banks will be promoting a wide range of their services to individual segments of their customer base most likely to respond at a given time. Many of these banks are also leveraging all available communication channels (direct mail, email, phone, online banking, etc.) to support these efforts.
The key in all of these initiatives will be to make sure cross-selling is done for the benefit of the customer as opposed to simply reaching desired metrics. As many banks found out in the past, profitability is not automatically enhanced with an additional product sale. The focus needs to be on finding the correct solution for customer's needs which, in turn, will lead to an expanded relationship in dollars, services, and share of wallet.
How is your bank balancing the investment in cross-selling vs. acquisition marketing? Has there been a shift to either strategy in the past couple years at your bank? How do you view the future of acquisition and cross-sales?
Monday, November 11, 2013
Can Banks Find Ways to Make Deposits Work Harder?
As was mentioned in yesterday's American Banker article, In Cash Glut, Banks Try to Discourage New Deposits, many banks are currently in a somewhat disadvantageous position of having an abundance of deposits at a time of depressed loan demand. With loan to deposit ratios dropping from a median of more than 105% to less than 95% in less than two years for the 15 largest banks, the excess liquidity is costing banks money.
This inability to earn adequate interest on these deposits, combined with lower overdraft fees and the potential for lower interchange income has banks that I am working with scurrying for ways to make up the revenue shortfall.
Some banks are reconfiguring their checking account pricing either by adding fees for enhanced services such as privacy protection or rewards program participation or are reducing costs by offering new streamlined products that have limited service structures (like Bank of America's new online checking test).
And there is no end in sight to the inflow of deposits, as the confidence level of both consumers and businesses is weak enough to encourage a heavier savings mentality and with the equity markets too risky for many investors. Many banks are seeing inflows even with historically low interest rates being paid on deposits.
While loan demand will eventually pick up and banks will most likely find ways to recoup some of the lost fee income through new products or pricing structures, the best long-term solution is to change from a transaction support mentality to a customer relationship perspective. This holistic view encourages the acquisition of accounts with a greater long term potential, a stronger emphasis on engagement of these accounts to increase fee income and reduce attrition, and a focused effort on increasing share of wallet through needs based cross-selling.
At a time when margins are razor this, loan/deposit ratios are anemic and traditional fee income is being attacked by new regulations, it is imperative that we maximize the value of relationships at every step of the customer lifecycle. Historically, too much revenue has been 'left on the table' and we have been accepting of people who open new accounts simply for a premium (gamers), customers with dormant or low activity accounts, and single service customers. Going forward, we need to refocus our efforts on increasing our value proposition at the same time we reduce delivery costs and maximize relationship value.
Has your bank stopped their deposit acquisition efforts? Has there been an increased focus on the engagement and cross-sell processes at your bank? I would love to hear about your bank's strategy for dealing with the abundance of deposits that currently exists.
This inability to earn adequate interest on these deposits, combined with lower overdraft fees and the potential for lower interchange income has banks that I am working with scurrying for ways to make up the revenue shortfall.
Some banks are reconfiguring their checking account pricing either by adding fees for enhanced services such as privacy protection or rewards program participation or are reducing costs by offering new streamlined products that have limited service structures (like Bank of America's new online checking test).
And there is no end in sight to the inflow of deposits, as the confidence level of both consumers and businesses is weak enough to encourage a heavier savings mentality and with the equity markets too risky for many investors. Many banks are seeing inflows even with historically low interest rates being paid on deposits.
While loan demand will eventually pick up and banks will most likely find ways to recoup some of the lost fee income through new products or pricing structures, the best long-term solution is to change from a transaction support mentality to a customer relationship perspective. This holistic view encourages the acquisition of accounts with a greater long term potential, a stronger emphasis on engagement of these accounts to increase fee income and reduce attrition, and a focused effort on increasing share of wallet through needs based cross-selling.
At a time when margins are razor this, loan/deposit ratios are anemic and traditional fee income is being attacked by new regulations, it is imperative that we maximize the value of relationships at every step of the customer lifecycle. Historically, too much revenue has been 'left on the table' and we have been accepting of people who open new accounts simply for a premium (gamers), customers with dormant or low activity accounts, and single service customers. Going forward, we need to refocus our efforts on increasing our value proposition at the same time we reduce delivery costs and maximize relationship value.
Has your bank stopped their deposit acquisition efforts? Has there been an increased focus on the engagement and cross-sell processes at your bank? I would love to hear about your bank's strategy for dealing with the abundance of deposits that currently exists.
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Zions Bank Integrated Strategy Yields Results
I recently spent a couple days at a Marketing Summit with the Zions Bank direct marketing team and their interactive agency Richter7 in Salt Lake City and it was exciting to see the great results of their integrated marketing communications programs.
Not only have they lowered an already industry low attrition rate with their multi-touch onboarding program that uses direct mail, email and phone contacts of customers over the first 90 days of the relationship, but they have also seen a strong increase in account engagement, cross-sales and balance enhancement. Even using very conservative estimates, the ROI of the program far exceeds 400%, with enhancements still being introduced to improve these results.
In addition to a best-in-class onboarding process, they also have seen seen great results from their recently introduced multi-touch customer cross-sell program that scores every household to determine the best product to offer each quarter. This systematic communication based on product propensity and a next most likely product score has enabled the bank to be both efficient and effective in their sales efforts, replacing a multitude of programs that used to be run on an ad hoc basis over the course of a year. Like the onboarding program, the great results for the cross-sell program can be attributed to both excellent targeting and leveraging multiple channels as opposed just one communication medium.
Beyond these foundational programs, the Zions team continues to test new ideas that banks several times larger are not doing. In addition to being close to introducing a new customer acquisition program that leverages multiple channels, traffic generation and the power of their sales force, they are more focused than many in the industry on the power of social media, online and mobile banking (just introduced) and continuously improving metrics. They are even building the infrastructure to expand some of these initiatives to their affiliate network. As a lead player on the Zions team, Matt Wilcox mentioned during the meeting, "I want Zions Bancorporation to be a recognized marketing leader in the financial services industry and to do things that others just imagine".
I want to thank the teams from Zions and Richter7 as well as the people from our team that continue to amaze me by what can be accomplished with senior level approval and with an attitude of partnership and a forward focus. It is always an energizing summit to attend and the results definitely illustrate the value of these planning meetings.
Matt Wilcox has also agree to join me at BAI Retail Delivery 2010 in Las Vegas where on Monday, October 18 we will partner on a half day workshop entitled, Improving Acquisition, Onboarding and Cross-Sell Effectiveness with Multi-Channel Communication . During this session, we will discuss ways to leverage multiple channels in the implementation of successful, integrated marketing communications programs.
Not only have they lowered an already industry low attrition rate with their multi-touch onboarding program that uses direct mail, email and phone contacts of customers over the first 90 days of the relationship, but they have also seen a strong increase in account engagement, cross-sales and balance enhancement. Even using very conservative estimates, the ROI of the program far exceeds 400%, with enhancements still being introduced to improve these results.
In addition to a best-in-class onboarding process, they also have seen seen great results from their recently introduced multi-touch customer cross-sell program that scores every household to determine the best product to offer each quarter. This systematic communication based on product propensity and a next most likely product score has enabled the bank to be both efficient and effective in their sales efforts, replacing a multitude of programs that used to be run on an ad hoc basis over the course of a year. Like the onboarding program, the great results for the cross-sell program can be attributed to both excellent targeting and leveraging multiple channels as opposed just one communication medium.
Beyond these foundational programs, the Zions team continues to test new ideas that banks several times larger are not doing. In addition to being close to introducing a new customer acquisition program that leverages multiple channels, traffic generation and the power of their sales force, they are more focused than many in the industry on the power of social media, online and mobile banking (just introduced) and continuously improving metrics. They are even building the infrastructure to expand some of these initiatives to their affiliate network. As a lead player on the Zions team, Matt Wilcox mentioned during the meeting, "I want Zions Bancorporation to be a recognized marketing leader in the financial services industry and to do things that others just imagine".
I want to thank the teams from Zions and Richter7 as well as the people from our team that continue to amaze me by what can be accomplished with senior level approval and with an attitude of partnership and a forward focus. It is always an energizing summit to attend and the results definitely illustrate the value of these planning meetings.
Matt Wilcox has also agree to join me at BAI Retail Delivery 2010 in Las Vegas where on Monday, October 18 we will partner on a half day workshop entitled, Improving Acquisition, Onboarding and Cross-Sell Effectiveness with Multi-Channel Communication . During this session, we will discuss ways to leverage multiple channels in the implementation of successful, integrated marketing communications programs.
Saturday, November 9, 2013
The Sales Funnel Revisted
For my whole career, both in marketing and sales, I have understood the concept and importance of the sales funnel. Conceptually speaking, the traditional sales funnel starts with awareness being generated at the top of the funnel (the widest part) and then having the prospect work down the funnel through the stages of interest, consideration, commitment and eventually having a sale made at the narrowest part of the funnel. The funnel framework worked fairly well in providing the foundation for understanding what metrics should be concentrated on and where resources should be deployed.
But what happens in a world where prospects have so many more tools at their disposal to evaluate your offerings on their own or where they skip stages of the process all together?
In addition, while the traditional sales funnel usually ends when the sale is consummated, should that really be the end of sales and marketing's engagement with the customer? Shouldn't we also measure post sales activities that build share of wallet and recognize the challenges of an unengaged customer or one who attrites?
A couple months ago, the people at Focus.com asked 14 sales and marketing experts to view the sales funnel concept in a world of the Internet, social media, word of mouth marketing, massive choice and competition? They reached out to their Focus Expert Network to submit their version of the sales funnel with one condition . . . the funnel and the rationale for their depiction had to fit on one page.
The results just released this week were, to say the least, both innovative and thought provoking. Some experts provided an interpretation that redefined the steps of the sales process and the sources of leads, taking into account the impact of the Internet and the need to more closely integrate sales and marketing. Matt West from Genius.com had a traditional shaped funnel but added the important steps of lead nurturing and cross-selling while discussing the challenge of unknown prospects 'above the funnel'.
There was more than one version that visually looked more like an hour glass, reflecting the important post-sale steps that are required to get a new customer engaged and to build the value of the relationship through repurchase or evangelism. Matt Heinz from Heinz Marketing stated that, "the traditional sales funnel only reflects half the story", ignoring the impact of referrals, repeat business, renewals, etc.
My favorite, however, was probably the entry from Michael Damphousse from Green Leads who threw away the visual of the funnel altogether and provided a diagram of a 'DemandGen Cloud', reflecting that prospects have the power and capability to insert themselves anywhere they want in the sales and marketing funnel. He also reflected that once in the funnel, the prospect can jump to any step they want as a result of web content and word of mouth. He emphasizes the importance of harnessing the chaos to maximize results.
So what does this have to do with banking? First of all, it reflects the impact of the new communication channels such as the Internet and social media. It also emphasizes the importance of going beyond generating a sale, and instead, generating a relationship. Finally, it reflects the diversity of ways to look at the interaction of sales and marketing in any sales process. This is especially true in more complex sales such as small business, commercial, investment services, etc. Whatever funnel you prefer, however, one major challenge needs to be addressed. Whatever the steps, sales and marketing must be in alignment and finance needs to buy off on the metrics and business case. With this uniform and integrated view, the sales process will definitely not be optimized, and it may actually fail.
What does your sales funnel look like? I would love to see even more creative examples of what your interpretation of today's sales funnel might be. Share it with me at jmarous@aol.com and I will post some of my favorites. Oh yeah, the same rules of a one page limit still apply.
But what happens in a world where prospects have so many more tools at their disposal to evaluate your offerings on their own or where they skip stages of the process all together?
In addition, while the traditional sales funnel usually ends when the sale is consummated, should that really be the end of sales and marketing's engagement with the customer? Shouldn't we also measure post sales activities that build share of wallet and recognize the challenges of an unengaged customer or one who attrites?
A couple months ago, the people at Focus.com asked 14 sales and marketing experts to view the sales funnel concept in a world of the Internet, social media, word of mouth marketing, massive choice and competition? They reached out to their Focus Expert Network to submit their version of the sales funnel with one condition . . . the funnel and the rationale for their depiction had to fit on one page.
The results just released this week were, to say the least, both innovative and thought provoking. Some experts provided an interpretation that redefined the steps of the sales process and the sources of leads, taking into account the impact of the Internet and the need to more closely integrate sales and marketing. Matt West from Genius.com had a traditional shaped funnel but added the important steps of lead nurturing and cross-selling while discussing the challenge of unknown prospects 'above the funnel'.
There was more than one version that visually looked more like an hour glass, reflecting the important post-sale steps that are required to get a new customer engaged and to build the value of the relationship through repurchase or evangelism. Matt Heinz from Heinz Marketing stated that, "the traditional sales funnel only reflects half the story", ignoring the impact of referrals, repeat business, renewals, etc.
My favorite, however, was probably the entry from Michael Damphousse from Green Leads who threw away the visual of the funnel altogether and provided a diagram of a 'DemandGen Cloud', reflecting that prospects have the power and capability to insert themselves anywhere they want in the sales and marketing funnel. He also reflected that once in the funnel, the prospect can jump to any step they want as a result of web content and word of mouth. He emphasizes the importance of harnessing the chaos to maximize results.
So what does this have to do with banking? First of all, it reflects the impact of the new communication channels such as the Internet and social media. It also emphasizes the importance of going beyond generating a sale, and instead, generating a relationship. Finally, it reflects the diversity of ways to look at the interaction of sales and marketing in any sales process. This is especially true in more complex sales such as small business, commercial, investment services, etc. Whatever funnel you prefer, however, one major challenge needs to be addressed. Whatever the steps, sales and marketing must be in alignment and finance needs to buy off on the metrics and business case. With this uniform and integrated view, the sales process will definitely not be optimized, and it may actually fail.
What does your sales funnel look like? I would love to see even more creative examples of what your interpretation of today's sales funnel might be. Share it with me at jmarous@aol.com and I will post some of my favorites. Oh yeah, the same rules of a one page limit still apply.
Friday, November 8, 2013
Worldwide Response to the Importance of Cross-Selling
Last July, I posted a question on the Retail Banking Network Group on LinkedIn asking how the goal of cross-selling is prioritized in relationship to the goal of new customer acquisition at banks today. Since my posting, I have had more than 80 comments from bankers representing large and small financial organizations all over the world.
For instance, Lance van Wyk, Regional General Manager at Nedbank Ltd in South Africa believes that education, reward and recognition of employees is needed to improve cross-selling. In addition, he believes the timing of cross-selling is important and states, "Proactive investments in cross-selling at the acquisition stage could prove highly rewarding".
An ongoing contributor, Serge Milman from Optirate in San Francisco believes that smaller community banks and credit unions can only compete with the much larger financials that provide both a more innovative product set and greater convenience if they expand their view of their marketplace beyond their own back yard. He also believes that in addition to better cross-selling, these smaller organizations need to pursue more aggressive growth and strategies. In later posts, he emphasizes the importance of marketing products nationwide by smaller institutions but acknowledges that the skills needed to effectively gather customer insights and build segmentation strategies may be beyond the skill sets (and budgets) of a smaller bank or credit union.
He further believes that differentiation is needed to achieve cross-sell growth objectives. Serge states, "Why is it that a typical bank has a portfolio of 60%+ customers with just one product? It is not because customers are unaware that Bank XYZ offers other banking products; it is because Bank XYZ has not convinced customers that its products are in any way differentiated from the 16,000 other banks and credit unions".
Nikhil Datar, a management consultant from the U.K., agreed with Serge that an understanding of the customer is needed in order to be effective in cross-selling. He further emphasizes that a bank can't only cross-sell when the bank has product needs. According to Datar, this type of effort becomes unsustainable. "Many customers are irritated when they are contacted only when the bank wants to sell something".
As a training specialist from Australia and a frequent contributor to the Linkedin discussion, Simon Offer suggests that a key to effective cross-selling begins with a well trained staff. Simon states, "A life cycle is used to help identify at what stage the the customer is at and what is the main priority for that customer. This technique enables the staff to target their discussions to customer. Using different channels, the techniques and targets will be different depending on the communication needed. To be effective, the education needs to be reinforced on a regular basis and tools made available to the staff such as desk charts, manuals etc."
Jay Kassing, the owner of Dallas-based financial services solution provider Marquis reminded his fellow bankers that achieving growth of 12-15% annually is made exceedingly difficult when annual attrition rates for most firms average 15% or more. He believes the focus should also be on stemming attrition, thereby reducing the level of sales needed just to break even. Bob Isola from Content Critical, LLC. in New York also reminds bankers of the power of the monthly statement to reinforce sales messages on a personalized basis.
Probably the most active contributor to the cross-selling discussion was Bob Critchfield from RLC Performance Management in Detroit. One of his ongoing themes has been that most current customers are not fully served by any particular bank and that we should not confuse product sales with providing solutions to customer needs. As he mentions, each of these needs provides the opportunity for sales, revenue and even enhanced customer satisfaction. In addition, he provided a real life example of where secondary business signers on an account are not normally pursued for personal relationships.
Finally, a dose of reality was provided by Jan Floyd-Douglass, a Director from The 9 Situations in the UK, who reminded us that many of the internal sales policies and targets can actually result in artificial 'sales' that divide a customer's relationship to the disadvantage of the customer. This type of activity also has a negative revenue impact on the bank.
I encourage you to visit and participate in the Linkedin discussion around cross-selling within the Retail Banking Network Group. Or you can visit my original Bank Marketing Strategies Blog entry.
For instance, Lance van Wyk, Regional General Manager at Nedbank Ltd in South Africa believes that education, reward and recognition of employees is needed to improve cross-selling. In addition, he believes the timing of cross-selling is important and states, "Proactive investments in cross-selling at the acquisition stage could prove highly rewarding".
An ongoing contributor, Serge Milman from Optirate in San Francisco believes that smaller community banks and credit unions can only compete with the much larger financials that provide both a more innovative product set and greater convenience if they expand their view of their marketplace beyond their own back yard. He also believes that in addition to better cross-selling, these smaller organizations need to pursue more aggressive growth and strategies. In later posts, he emphasizes the importance of marketing products nationwide by smaller institutions but acknowledges that the skills needed to effectively gather customer insights and build segmentation strategies may be beyond the skill sets (and budgets) of a smaller bank or credit union.
He further believes that differentiation is needed to achieve cross-sell growth objectives. Serge states, "Why is it that a typical bank has a portfolio of 60%+ customers with just one product? It is not because customers are unaware that Bank XYZ offers other banking products; it is because Bank XYZ has not convinced customers that its products are in any way differentiated from the 16,000 other banks and credit unions".
Nikhil Datar, a management consultant from the U.K., agreed with Serge that an understanding of the customer is needed in order to be effective in cross-selling. He further emphasizes that a bank can't only cross-sell when the bank has product needs. According to Datar, this type of effort becomes unsustainable. "Many customers are irritated when they are contacted only when the bank wants to sell something".
As a training specialist from Australia and a frequent contributor to the Linkedin discussion, Simon Offer suggests that a key to effective cross-selling begins with a well trained staff. Simon states, "A life cycle is used to help identify at what stage the the customer is at and what is the main priority for that customer. This technique enables the staff to target their discussions to customer. Using different channels, the techniques and targets will be different depending on the communication needed. To be effective, the education needs to be reinforced on a regular basis and tools made available to the staff such as desk charts, manuals etc."
Jay Kassing, the owner of Dallas-based financial services solution provider Marquis reminded his fellow bankers that achieving growth of 12-15% annually is made exceedingly difficult when annual attrition rates for most firms average 15% or more. He believes the focus should also be on stemming attrition, thereby reducing the level of sales needed just to break even. Bob Isola from Content Critical, LLC. in New York also reminds bankers of the power of the monthly statement to reinforce sales messages on a personalized basis.
Probably the most active contributor to the cross-selling discussion was Bob Critchfield from RLC Performance Management in Detroit. One of his ongoing themes has been that most current customers are not fully served by any particular bank and that we should not confuse product sales with providing solutions to customer needs. As he mentions, each of these needs provides the opportunity for sales, revenue and even enhanced customer satisfaction. In addition, he provided a real life example of where secondary business signers on an account are not normally pursued for personal relationships.
Finally, a dose of reality was provided by Jan Floyd-Douglass, a Director from The 9 Situations in the UK, who reminded us that many of the internal sales policies and targets can actually result in artificial 'sales' that divide a customer's relationship to the disadvantage of the customer. This type of activity also has a negative revenue impact on the bank.
I encourage you to visit and participate in the Linkedin discussion around cross-selling within the Retail Banking Network Group. Or you can visit my original Bank Marketing Strategies Blog entry.
Ten Bank Marketer Resolutions for 2011
It is the dawning of a new year in banking with many of the same challenges that we saw in 2010. Our industry continues to be viewed in a less than positive light from both the consumer and small business marketplace.
The need for new customer growth and share of wallet expansion underpins the need for new sources of non-interest fee income at a time when regulations are dramatically reducing many traditional sources of revenue. In addition, the expansion of transaction and communication channels are changing the ways we interact with customers.
These challenges are combined with an historically low interest rate environment and a credit environment where there is a massive amount of money to lend at a time when borrowing is more difficult and less desirable for many.
According to a national survey, the majority of personal resolutions in 2011 will revolve around saving money, losing weight, changing a bad habit and being closer to loved ones. Achieving any of these goals will take commitment, focus and changes in behavior. The same can be said for the resolutions I have developed from traveling the country over the past few months and being involved in a number of banks' annual planning efforts.
Here are areas where bank marketers believe they should focus in 2011:
1. Replace Lost Fee Income
Nothing has impacted banking over the past 12-18 months or will impact banking in 2011 more than the loss of fee income caused by the combination of the Card Act, Reg. E, and the upcoming changes from the Durbin Amendment. Almost all other resolutions for the upcoming year are built to address this need. The role of bank marketers in achieving fee income replacement goals will include checking product restructuring and new fee-based product development, increasing card transactions, improving customer engagement and better resource allocation for results.
2. Improve the Customer Experience
Another overarching resolution similar to the personal resolution of being closer to loved ones, bank marketers need to view all of their initiatives using the lens of understanding customer's needs, looking out for customers and rewarding their relationship. In an environment of heightened scrutiny of how we are treating customers, it will be more important than ever to market to consumers and small businesses on a more personalized basis from the day they open their first account and to build a reward structure that reinforces our commitment to relationship retention and growth.
3. Focus on Incremental New Customer Growth
A new balance between quantity and quality of new accounts needs to be struck. With the elimination of Free Checking occurring at most banks I visit, new acquisition models need to be developed that take into account the new checking account continuum. Instead of generating as many accounts as possible, banks will be focusing on the potential value of relationships including the likelihood of engagement and retention. A premium will be paid for those households that will immediately contribute to the bottom line.
4. Gather Email Addresses
When presenting at the BAI Retail Delivery Conference this Fall, it amazed me that there were more banks that collected cell phone numbers than collected email addresses at the new account desk. I suppose this phenomenon may be caused by the combination of more households using a cell phone as opposed to a land line for home communication and the relative ease of having a bank's IT team build another phone field into the new account process as opposed to an email field. But with other communication channel cost increasing and the improved results achieved when email is combined with more traditional channels, the importance of collecting (and using) email addresses has never been more important. Some banks are even considering stand alone marketing initiatives to address this need in 2011.
5. Reduce Customer Attrition
At a time when the cost of acquiring a new customer exceeds $200 and the annual income potential from a new relationship is at least as high, banks can ill afford to accept first year attrition rates of 30-40%. Multichannel onboarding programs that encourage alternative channel use, enhanced services (such as online bill pay, automatic savings, privacy products, etc.) and increased transactions need to be leveraged to stop the massive outflow of accounts that occur early in the customer's lifecycle. Improved tracking of relationship diminishment and win-back programs will also be used to achieve this resolution.
6. Expand Share of Wallet Through Lifestage Marketing
To compensate for the increased difficulty of generating high value relationships, there needs to be a much greater focus on organic growth, including behavior based cross-selling and lifestage marketing. While the movement from product centricity to being customer-centric has been discussed for decades, the removal of product silos is no longer an option for those banks who are seeking optimal resource allocation. More banks than ever are investing in improved models and strategies for relationship growth which will improve both engagement levels and retention in the long term. New service introductions such as privacy protection and enhanced personal financial management (PFM) tools will further allow for relationship deepening in 2011.
7. Don't Confuse Channel Economy with Channel Efficiency
No communication channel is 'free'. While email may seem like a far less costly channel to use for reaching customers, the lack of clear targeting and message development may prove costly as customers opt-out of future communications or simply ignore email messages. In my experience within the banking industry, email has not proven to be as good of a replacement for channels like direct mail as it has been a good supplement for improved results. In 2011, banks will develop much better processes for measuring the incremental impact of alternative channel communication and will continue to expand communication channels to include mobile, ATMs, social media, etc.
8. Leverage Social Media Personally and Professionally
Social media channels definitely can be beneficial or a distraction. Not many of us have time for reading about someone else's dinner plans or personal political opinions on Twitter, yet Twitter can be a great source of timely financial industry or marketing insight and competitive research delivered in a very compact format to the desktop for consumption at a time and place desired. Banks have also realized that social channels need to be used differently in financial services than with retail or other industry verticals. As opposed to trying to find 'friends' of our brands, social media has been used most effectively for customer service (Twitter) and for the promotion of broad based public relations initiatives (Chase's very popular Community Giving Campaign). The coming year will be a year of expanded testing of these new channels for the banking industry. Unlike the past, however, investment in these channels will need to generate a tangible ROI.
9. Deliver On The Mobile Banking Promise
The opportunity to be a 'first mover' in the mobile banking marketplace is quickly closing as more and more financial organizations are introducing products that work on multiple platforms. Bank of America has found that their market leading mobile banking customer base has significantly less attrition than a customer without a mobile banking application. USAA has continued to push the envelope on ways to use the mobile phone for financial convenience including remote deposit capture, receiving auto insurance quotes, requesting proof of insurance cards, etc. While building a concrete business case for mobile banking may be challenging, the marketplace will eventually demand this channel for P2P payments, geolocational applications and even low cost banking alternatives. Next year will also see the first wave of iPad and Android tablet applications that go beyond minor adjustments to current phone applications and leverage the enhanced capabilities of the popular tablet hardware.
10. Reconfigure The Branch Bank Model
The most challenging resolution for 2011 may be the testing and development of new branch banking models in light of the shift in channel use by the consumer. As branches are increasingly used primarily for account openings and small business servicing, the physical and operational configuration of branch networks will need to be evaluated. But what will be the best model for the future? While Citibank introduced a refined branch model late last year similar to an Apple Store, Huntington Bank went in an opposite direction by expanding their branch network and increasing hours and days of operation. With such a significant investment in real estate and human resources to support branch operations, each bank will be testing a variety of options in the next few years with multiple configurations most likely winning based on specific market dynamics.
I am sure there are several more important resolutions that can be added to my list, but there are already more than many of us can handle. This will definitely challenge the ability to focus and to achieve meaningful results especially in an environment of continuous change. Similar to personal resolutions, however, we all need to start as soon as possible and focus our attention on those resolutions that have the greatest impact and opportunity for success.
Let me hear where you will be focusing your efforts in 2011.
New Email Marketing Study Highlights Missed Opportunities for Bankers
As social media channels continue to proliferate and traditional communication channels become more expensive, bankers struggle with how to maximize the effectiveness of the email channel within their marketing mix according to a just released study from SubcriberMail, a Harland Clarke company. The study entitled, Email Marketing Within Financial Services Institutions, surveyed 71 banks and 191 credit unions, finding that email marketing among these organizations to be strong and growing.
But, while many organizations are leveraging email to inform and communicate news and product information (50% for both banks and credit unions) and even cross-sell existing customers (56% of credit unions/42% of banks), a far lower percentage of credit unions and banks use email as part of a multi-channel onboarding and/or activation process (26% and 27% respectively) or use email for delivery of an electronic receipt.
This is a missed opportunity since studies show that new account holders are very open to all channels of communication early in their relationship and that as many as 75% of customers open and read transactional emails. In addition, in working with financial organizations across the country in the development and implementation of onboarding programs, early customer engagement, cross-selling and retention are all positively impacted by adding email marketing to the communications mix.
At some organizations such as Chase, email welcoming messages many times arrive at the customer's home before the customer returns from opening a new account. This communication is used to thank the customer for opening their account, encourage usage of engagement services (online banking, debit cards, direct deposit) and describe future communication the customer will receive from the bank.
So why the hesitation in using email as a communications tool? According to the survey, while the fear of phishing or fraud was a significant concern, the primary controllable challenges to successful email marketing included the effective collection of email addresses in the first place in addition to subscriber churn (or addresses going bad). Roughly 40% of banks and credit unions found both of these issues to be an impediment to success.
To address these concerns, the SubscriberMail study suggested a holistic, company-wide approach to collecting and confirming customer's email addresses at every touch point. This would include collection and verification at the branch level, call center, and even as part of direct mail efforts and at the ATM. The key is to establish the collection and maintenance of an email address database as an overarching corporate initiative that will result in both lower communication costs as well as improved marketing effectiveness.
Unfortunately, senior management support of such an initiative was far from a reality according to the survey, with less than 30% of the bank respondents stating that senior management was supportive of email marketing strategies. With a subscriber email address valuation estimated to be an average of $118 according to a recent DMA Email Experience Council calculator, marketers need to continue to seek managerial support for their email collection initiatives.
Another challenge to keeping a subscriber database up-to-date comes from the customer's perspective, since allowing email communication is directly correlated to the relevancy and value derived from the emails a customer receives. As with traditional direct mail, relevancy depends on effective segmentation of the email database and timely communication of opportunities, events and offers. Again, both banks and credit unions were found to fall short in their efforts to segment customers, with far fewer than 50% segmenting their email database in any manner. Interestingly, only half of the responders had email initiatives planned in the next six months, indicating a less than robust email strategy and the potential for the customer to undervalue email communication from their financial institution.
Overall, the SubscriberMail survey results illustrated a tremendous amount of untapped potential with the email channel and the need for the same type of discipline with email marketing as with other direct channels. With increased focus on the collection and cleansing of email database files, improved segmentation and more consistent use of this communication tool, return on marketing investment can be improved at a time when bank marketing budgets are being reduced.
I am interested in your results and use of email within your bank.
If you are interested in this free survey, simply follow this link to the download.
But, while many organizations are leveraging email to inform and communicate news and product information (50% for both banks and credit unions) and even cross-sell existing customers (56% of credit unions/42% of banks), a far lower percentage of credit unions and banks use email as part of a multi-channel onboarding and/or activation process (26% and 27% respectively) or use email for delivery of an electronic receipt.
This is a missed opportunity since studies show that new account holders are very open to all channels of communication early in their relationship and that as many as 75% of customers open and read transactional emails. In addition, in working with financial organizations across the country in the development and implementation of onboarding programs, early customer engagement, cross-selling and retention are all positively impacted by adding email marketing to the communications mix.
At some organizations such as Chase, email welcoming messages many times arrive at the customer's home before the customer returns from opening a new account. This communication is used to thank the customer for opening their account, encourage usage of engagement services (online banking, debit cards, direct deposit) and describe future communication the customer will receive from the bank.
So why the hesitation in using email as a communications tool? According to the survey, while the fear of phishing or fraud was a significant concern, the primary controllable challenges to successful email marketing included the effective collection of email addresses in the first place in addition to subscriber churn (or addresses going bad). Roughly 40% of banks and credit unions found both of these issues to be an impediment to success.
To address these concerns, the SubscriberMail study suggested a holistic, company-wide approach to collecting and confirming customer's email addresses at every touch point. This would include collection and verification at the branch level, call center, and even as part of direct mail efforts and at the ATM. The key is to establish the collection and maintenance of an email address database as an overarching corporate initiative that will result in both lower communication costs as well as improved marketing effectiveness.
Unfortunately, senior management support of such an initiative was far from a reality according to the survey, with less than 30% of the bank respondents stating that senior management was supportive of email marketing strategies. With a subscriber email address valuation estimated to be an average of $118 according to a recent DMA Email Experience Council calculator, marketers need to continue to seek managerial support for their email collection initiatives.
Another challenge to keeping a subscriber database up-to-date comes from the customer's perspective, since allowing email communication is directly correlated to the relevancy and value derived from the emails a customer receives. As with traditional direct mail, relevancy depends on effective segmentation of the email database and timely communication of opportunities, events and offers. Again, both banks and credit unions were found to fall short in their efforts to segment customers, with far fewer than 50% segmenting their email database in any manner. Interestingly, only half of the responders had email initiatives planned in the next six months, indicating a less than robust email strategy and the potential for the customer to undervalue email communication from their financial institution.
Overall, the SubscriberMail survey results illustrated a tremendous amount of untapped potential with the email channel and the need for the same type of discipline with email marketing as with other direct channels. With increased focus on the collection and cleansing of email database files, improved segmentation and more consistent use of this communication tool, return on marketing investment can be improved at a time when bank marketing budgets are being reduced.
I am interested in your results and use of email within your bank.
If you are interested in this free survey, simply follow this link to the download.
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Reaching the ATM Customer With Intelligent Personalization
About a month ago, I visited my neighborhood branch office on a Saturday to open a few new accounts and was surprised to see the vast difference in customer traffic outside the branch compared to inside the office. More specifically, it was clear that the traffic outside the office was almost entirely for the ATM, since during my 30 minute visit only 3 people were served through the drive-up window while no less than 25 customers used the ATM. The manager even mentioned that she had offered the drive-up lane to the long line of ATM users, only to be told that, "we only need to make a withdrawal" (I guess many people don't remember the purpose of withdrawal slips).
While I realize the primary advantage of using an ATM is speed and convenience, are bank marketers missing an opportunity to expand communication through this channel? Having a captive audience, if only for a couple minutes, provides the opportunity to both target communications as well as collect insight.
According to a white paper entitled, "The Use of ATM Screens to Augment Marketing Initiatives" presented by sponsored by Elan Financial Services, 40 percent of the adult population use ATMs 10 or more times in a month. For many cardholders, like myself, the ATM is the most frequent touchpoint connecting a customer and his/her bank. Based on the white paper, the opportunities for communication exist during 'waiting periods' when the transaction is being processed. Specifically, these opportunities include:
In my travels, it is clear many banks are testing the expanded software and hardware capabilities of the ATM channel enabling marketing and product owners to deliver highly targeted and visually appealing static or video communications to customers based on their demographics, current relationship (or lack thereof), other marketing messaging being delivered through other channels, geographic location, time of day and type of device being used (full function ATM, cash dispenser, in branch kiosk, etc.). Instead of printing ridiculously long sales messages on ATM receipts or using a 'one size fits all' approach to communication, banks can leverage the screen and alternative channels to personalize messages.
For instance, on my return from the BAI Retail Delivery Conference in Las Vegas this year, I used a Wells Fargo ATM for a withdrawal and was asked if I would be interested in a consolidation loan from the bank. Instead of a long sales message that would slow down the transaction or a printed message on the receipt that would be thrown out, they provided the option of email delivery of the offer as shown below.
In any event, this type of integration of channels and messages is an enhanced sales process compared to long, less targeted screen messages or receipt communication. In fact, there is no reason why the ATM can't be integrated with other customer communication that can extend into the branch based on the time of day and location of ATM, or to a mobile phone or even an iPad. Much like Wells Fargo has offered to have ATM receipts delivered to a mobile device or email, mobile devices also provide the ability for immediate locational offer delivery (possibly including tickets to an event, merchant funded offer or mobile banking funding option), while the iPad provides expanded communication real estate and functionality not available at an ATM or even through a personal computer.
With more and more banking being transacted out of the branch and the expanded capabilities offered by both hardware and software firms supporting the ATM delivery system, time will tell which banks will make the most of this opportunity to communicate to a relatively captive, active and mobile audience in a way that resonates and generates results. Keys to success will be some of the same communication and marketing rules from other channels (audience, channel, timing, offer) combined with the ability to better measure results by channel, location and timing.
What is your bank doing to enhance the revenue generating and service aspects of your ATM network? I would love to hear from you.
While I realize the primary advantage of using an ATM is speed and convenience, are bank marketers missing an opportunity to expand communication through this channel? Having a captive audience, if only for a couple minutes, provides the opportunity to both target communications as well as collect insight.
According to a white paper entitled, "The Use of ATM Screens to Augment Marketing Initiatives" presented by sponsored by Elan Financial Services, 40 percent of the adult population use ATMs 10 or more times in a month. For many cardholders, like myself, the ATM is the most frequent touchpoint connecting a customer and his/her bank. Based on the white paper, the opportunities for communication exist during 'waiting periods' when the transaction is being processed. Specifically, these opportunities include:
- On the welcome screen when the transaction choice is being made
- On the wait screen when the consumer is provided the opportunity to make additional choices
- On the thank you screen when the card and receipt are being dispensed
In my travels, it is clear many banks are testing the expanded software and hardware capabilities of the ATM channel enabling marketing and product owners to deliver highly targeted and visually appealing static or video communications to customers based on their demographics, current relationship (or lack thereof), other marketing messaging being delivered through other channels, geographic location, time of day and type of device being used (full function ATM, cash dispenser, in branch kiosk, etc.). Instead of printing ridiculously long sales messages on ATM receipts or using a 'one size fits all' approach to communication, banks can leverage the screen and alternative channels to personalize messages.
For instance, on my return from the BAI Retail Delivery Conference in Las Vegas this year, I used a Wells Fargo ATM for a withdrawal and was asked if I would be interested in a consolidation loan from the bank. Instead of a long sales message that would slow down the transaction or a printed message on the receipt that would be thrown out, they provided the option of email delivery of the offer as shown below.
I am assuming this ATM strategy was in a test mode at the time since I didn't have the student loan referenced on the ATM. In addition, the email follow-up (shown below), which I expected to receive almost instantaneously, didn't arrive to my inbox for two weeks, which indicated the possibility that the follow-up process was still manual at the time.
In any event, this type of integration of channels and messages is an enhanced sales process compared to long, less targeted screen messages or receipt communication. In fact, there is no reason why the ATM can't be integrated with other customer communication that can extend into the branch based on the time of day and location of ATM, or to a mobile phone or even an iPad. Much like Wells Fargo has offered to have ATM receipts delivered to a mobile device or email, mobile devices also provide the ability for immediate locational offer delivery (possibly including tickets to an event, merchant funded offer or mobile banking funding option), while the iPad provides expanded communication real estate and functionality not available at an ATM or even through a personal computer.
With more and more banking being transacted out of the branch and the expanded capabilities offered by both hardware and software firms supporting the ATM delivery system, time will tell which banks will make the most of this opportunity to communicate to a relatively captive, active and mobile audience in a way that resonates and generates results. Keys to success will be some of the same communication and marketing rules from other channels (audience, channel, timing, offer) combined with the ability to better measure results by channel, location and timing.
What is your bank doing to enhance the revenue generating and service aspects of your ATM network? I would love to hear from you.
Labels:
ATM,
branches,
cross-sales,
debit cards,
multi-channel
Checking Changes Make Onboarding and Cross-Selling More Important
Over the past several weeks, many of the larger banks across the country have announced significant changes to their checking account continuum, including elimination of traditional Free Checking, discontinuation of rewards programs, ceasing reimbursement of foreign ATM fees, as well as potential fees and transaction limits on debit cards.
While each of these strategies are intended to reduce costs or generate revenue in response to Reg E and the Durbin Amendment, these changes could also present a challenge to banks as they seek to increase engagement and gain share of wallet. This is because debit card use and rewards program enrollment were two of the more important account engagement criteria and basis for a broader relationship growth.
According to an economic analysis on the effects of the Durbin interchange amendment presented to the Federal Reserve Board on February 22, between $33.4-$38.6 billion of debit card interchange will be lost during the first two years the new rules are in effect. This reduces the revenue on a personal checking account by $56-$64 and by $79-$92 on a small business checking account according to the study. These impacts make it more important than ever to optimize onboarding and cross-sell efforts for retail and small business customers thereby reducing costly attrition, improving engagement and providing a stronger foundation for ongoing relationship expansion.
Here are several of the steps financial institutions should consider as they begin to implement changes to their deposit accounts and debit products.
How are you going to ramp up your new customer communications to maximize your marketing ROI? Are you considering new ways of onboarding your customer in the first 30, 60 or 90 days? Have you found a way to leverage any social media in your onboarding process? I would love to hear your ideas.
While each of these strategies are intended to reduce costs or generate revenue in response to Reg E and the Durbin Amendment, these changes could also present a challenge to banks as they seek to increase engagement and gain share of wallet. This is because debit card use and rewards program enrollment were two of the more important account engagement criteria and basis for a broader relationship growth.
According to an economic analysis on the effects of the Durbin interchange amendment presented to the Federal Reserve Board on February 22, between $33.4-$38.6 billion of debit card interchange will be lost during the first two years the new rules are in effect. This reduces the revenue on a personal checking account by $56-$64 and by $79-$92 on a small business checking account according to the study. These impacts make it more important than ever to optimize onboarding and cross-sell efforts for retail and small business customers thereby reducing costly attrition, improving engagement and providing a stronger foundation for ongoing relationship expansion.
Here are several of the steps financial institutions should consider as they begin to implement changes to their deposit accounts and debit products.
- Double Down on Onboarding Initiatives: While most banks currently have an onboarding process for new retail customers, many have yet to build an onboarding process for small businesses. In addition, many programs only reach out to the customer once or twice and don't leverage a robust mix of communication channels. The impact of recent legislation makes the opportunity cost of attrition more expensive than ever. Banks need to increase the number of 'touches' a customer receives by email, phone and direct mail with the message centered on maximizing the benefits of using the account the customer just opened. When the account becomes active, then begin to expand the relationship.
- Don't Walk Away From Debit: While the economics of the debit card have definitely changed, the use of this payment vehicle remains better than many of the alternatives and provides the consumer with constant brand reinforcement each time they open their wallet. David Stewart from McKinsey & Company wrote in a recent BAI Banking Strategies article entitled, "Keeping Debit in Focus Post-Durbin" that debit cards remain an important component of the anchor DDA. As a result, getting new customers to activate and use their debit card as part of the onboarding process should continue to be a primary objective.
- Expand The Definition of Engagement: In the past, most banks focused on debit card utilization, enrollment in online banking (with bill pay) and the sign up for direct deposit in their onboarding messaging. While you don't want to cover too much in the onboarding communication, there are some households you may want to encourage to apply for a credit card and/or activate an autosave transfer as part of welcome process.
- Encourage Channel Migration: Another way to stem attrition, potentially reduce cost and build share of wallet is to increase alternative payments channel use. As part of the onboarding process, some of my clients are building messages around the use of mobile banking early in the relationship lifecycle. This makes sense based on recent trend research done by Javelin Strategy and the potential for offline customer mobile adoption found in research done by Fiserv. While there may only be minimal channel shift from a payments perspective initially, there could be significant savings if call center inquiries are reduced.
- Focus on Share of Wallet Early: While I totally agree with Ron Shevlin in his Marketing Tea Party blogs (Honeymooning and Why Engagement Matters) that a new customer must be courted and engaged before they can be cross-sold, customers define the pace of this trust building as opposed to the bank. This level of engagement/trust is usually found by looking at transaction volumes and whether engagement services are active. Once actively engaged, the customer should be offered additional services that may improve their overall banking experience. This is where product propensity models and behavioral segmentation can be effective.
- Leverage the New Account Desk: Many of my clients have found that the new account desk can be an effective cross-selling environment for the customer, especially if credit services such as credit cards, personal or small business lines of credit and even equity credit are pre-approved at the point of sale. The point of sale is also the best place to discuss the correct account to open in the first place and the benefits of engagement services and rewards alternatives.
How are you going to ramp up your new customer communications to maximize your marketing ROI? Are you considering new ways of onboarding your customer in the first 30, 60 or 90 days? Have you found a way to leverage any social media in your onboarding process? I would love to hear your ideas.
Labels:
checking,
credit cards,
cross-sales,
debit cards,
Durbin,
email,
engagement,
Free Checking,
interchange,
modeling,
onboarding,
online bill payment,
relationship banking,
revenue,
small business
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Revenue Replacement in a New Regulatory Environment
In my travels over the past 18-24 months, a single unifying theme seems to be of primary importance for all of the banks I visit . . . the need to find new sources of revenue to help offset the impact of environmental, competitive and regulatory changes that have occurred in our industry. With the potential of the Durbin Interchange Amendment hanging over our heads, lost overdraft fees from Reg E in our rear view mirror, the ability to pay interest on business deposits and the implications of the Card Act just 18 months ago, bank earnings are being squeezed from all directions.
According to Novantas, the regulatory changes alone have slashed retail banking revenues by more than $50 billion per year compared to pre-crisis levels. To make this number even more staggering, Novantas estimates that the equivalent cost savings needed to offset these lost revenues would entail closing 50,000 branches or would require a 1500% increase in maintenance fees. Neither of these options are feasible.
As banks look forward, while it will definitely be important to control costs across the organization, the immediate challenge will be to focus on ways to generate revenues that are significant and sustainable over time. To do so, banks should analyze opportunities across the entire customer lifecycle including product innovation, repricing, new engagement and cross-sell strategies, channel migration, improved marketing and enhanced measurement of results.
According to Novantas, the regulatory changes alone have slashed retail banking revenues by more than $50 billion per year compared to pre-crisis levels. To make this number even more staggering, Novantas estimates that the equivalent cost savings needed to offset these lost revenues would entail closing 50,000 branches or would require a 1500% increase in maintenance fees. Neither of these options are feasible.
As banks look forward, while it will definitely be important to control costs across the organization, the immediate challenge will be to focus on ways to generate revenues that are significant and sustainable over time. To do so, banks should analyze opportunities across the entire customer lifecycle including product innovation, repricing, new engagement and cross-sell strategies, channel migration, improved marketing and enhanced measurement of results.
Here are the top ten revenue replacement strategies I believe banks should focus on in today's environment. Some are rather rudimentary, while others may entail a paradigm shift within the organization in order to be implemented. Still others may not be consistent with your bank's brand or position in the marketplace. These strategies were the foundation of a presentation done at the 2011 Louisiana Bankers Association Annual Convention in New Orleans.
- Move Beyond Free Checking: With the implementation of Reg E and the potential impact of the Durbin Amendment, virtually every bank in the country is reviewing their checking product offerings to determine how they can positively impact earnings without negatively impacting their customer franchise. Much of this customer portfolio and product review is long overdue. The reliance on a 'free' lead product where penalty fees from the lowest balance accounts fund the majority of the portfolio is not sustainable. While some banks are building a much more robust segmentation strategy, where the relationship value will be more in line with the cost to the customer, other institutions are looking to a menu based approach, where components of the account (debit card, rewards program, ATM transactions, security services) are priced independently. Integral with this repricing strategy is the need for effective communication of changes and the opportunity to place customers in the best product set for their lifestage and transaction behavior. I cover this in a previous blog post entitled, Minimizing the Impact of Unintended Consequences.
- Focus on Quality Customer Growth: With the cost of new customer acquisition increasing and the quality of many new customers no longer meeting expectations, many banks are focusing their efforts on quality as opposed to quantity of customer acquired. Models are being developed that are based on incremental lift, potential for engagement, balance growth (using tools such as IXI wealth indicators) and likelihood for cross-sell and retention. In addition, many banks are fine-tuning their acquisition strategies to focus on branch trade area, neighborhood level direct communication as well as time tested programs like new mover acquisition. Many of these acquisition programs are at the carrier route level, taking advantage of postal economies. Finally, some organizations have had tremendous success leveraging their web sites, search engines and even social media to drive quality new account growth.
- Improve Customer Engagement: According to a study from Aite Group entitled, Measuring Customer Engagement: Making the Metric Matter, customers who have a higher level of engagement (more money movement, more transactions, online bill pay, direct deposit, more inquiries) are more likely to open another account with their bank in the next 12-24 months (27% vs. 5% for low engagement households), are more likely to recommend their bank to a friend (41% vs. 23%), and have a much more positive view of their financial institution. In addition, a more engaged household is significantly more profitable as shown by numerous research studies and covered in my blog post, A Business Case for Onboarding, where I illustrate the many financial benefits to a robust, multi-channel customer communication process in the first 90 days of the relationship.
![]() |
| Onboarding touchpoint roadmap example |
- Restructure Rewards Program: In the past, the majority of rewards programs were funded primarily with interchange income. With the potential for this revenue stream to be negatively impacted by the Durbin Amendment, the structure and underlying strategy for bank rewards programs need to be evaluated. Options that banks are considering include the complete removal of a rewards component from some or all classes of accounts, an adjustment in the value of the reward program currency and even the potential for an annual fee associated with the program. Another strategy is to move the funding of the rewards program from the bank to the retailer with a merchant-based rewards program partnership. Leading providers in this space include Cardlytics, BillShrink, Segmint and Bling Nation as well as home grown options that connect the merchant to the customer. The benefits of a merchant-funded reward program are many, with the primary advantage being the offering of much more targeted rewards to a finite audience of the bank based on online transactions. For more insight into merchant-based rewards, visit my blog post on the subject.
- Expand Share of Wallet Initiatives: In the BAI Banking Strategies article written by Sherief Meleis from Novantas entitled, Relationship Expansion: Sharpening the Focus, he points out that a bank would only need to increase the amount of business done by each customer by 15% in order to offset the $50 billion revenue shortfall facing our industry. While definitely not a slam dunk by any means, the concept of expanding share of wallet with current customers is far less daunting than trying to increase fees to compensate for the impact of legislation over the past 24 months. According to Novantas, approximately one quarter of deposits ($900 billion) as well as one half of loans ($4 trillion) and half of investments ($3.7 trillion) remain unconsolidated with primary financial institutions. Their research also indicates that as much as two thirds of these relationships are held by customers who are attitudinally willing to consolidate. The key for banks implementing this strategy will be to avoid boiling the ocean or overwhelming the customer with blanket communications. Instead, it is imperative to reach the right customer, at the right time, with the right message using the channel they prefer. A good discussion of some easy to implement cross-sell strategies is available on my blog post from April 15, 2011.
- Shift Debit/Credit/Prepaid Emphasis: While the Durbin Amendment may change the financial benefits of the debit card, it definitely doesn't change the importance of debit as an engagement and payment device. Some banks may be impacting the equilibrium of this payment device by adding annual fees, transaction fees and spending thresholds to the product. It is yet to be seen if these charges will stick or if they have a negative impact on the customer experience. Alternatively, banks can continue to encourage usage of the debit card while expanding their marketing efforts to include the potentially more profitable credit and prepaid debit cards. Serving alternative ends of the demographic spectrum, the appeal of credit cards is usually for people that want to leverage the grace period to their advantage. The appeal of the prepaid debit card is for people that want the convenience of a debit/ATM card without the fees of a checking account. The growth of the prepaid debit market has been significant in both the lower and mid demographic segments as people get frustrated with banking fees or have been closed out of the traditional banking system.
- Optimize Communication Channels: As the number of marketing messages received by each consumer has skyrocketed exponentially over the past decade, the control of consumption of these messages has definitely shifted from the marketer to the consumer. As economic growth has slowed and budget constraints at banks have impacted the amount of funding we have for marketing initiatives, there is a need to leverage less expensive, but potentially more expansive channels such as email, social media and even formal word of mouth strategies. Instead of replacing traditional media with electronic channels, however, banks need to manage a blend of channels that will yield the best results. For most initiatives, it is not an either/or proposition, but a media mix that needs to be optimized for each customer segment and marketing objective. This is definitely an area where a test and learn mindset is needed and where improved analytics are needed to determine channel attribution.
- Deliver on the Mobile Banking Promise: According to recent comScore research, 29.8 million Americans accessed financial services accounts (bank, credit card, or brokerage) via their mobile device in Q4 2010, an increase of 54 percent from Q4 2009. The report also found that preference for online access and security concerns topped the list of reasons why consumers have not yet used mobile banking. With such a skyrocketing growth and with the vast majority of banks now offering mobile banking, strategies need to be set forth that will ensure that mobile banking customers become engaged with their mobile banking provider as opposed to using the channel as a utility similar to an ATM. Studies show that mobile banking can effectively reduce costs related to call center usage and increase retention if the channel is enhanced with Personal Financial Management (PFM) applications and if the channel becomes more interactive and intuitive (a delivery device for rewards). The development of mobile banking strategies also need to include strategies for iPad applications that expand the mobile banking horizon far beyond what can be done on a smart phone.
- Reconfigure the Branch Model: As the use of electronic channels continues to increase, the functionality of the traditional bricks and mortar branch changes as well. Over the past several months, several innovative branch models have been tested including the Citi version of an Apple store as covered on The Financial Brand website. Going a different direction, but still focusing on the branch, Huntington Bank has recently purchased the rights to dozens of supermarket branches, extended hours to include evenings and Sundays and is in the midst of a $70 million branch refresh in which it will make over all of its 608 branches with new digital signage and e-merchandising. A third strategy is to significantly downsize the retail space, recognizing that the opening of accounts, responding to inquiries and handling transactions can be done using a much smaller footprint. The 'right' answer is not clear yet, and may reflect the bank's brand promise more than being strictly a cost or revenue decision. (Discussion on making the ATM channel more productive can be found on my November post)
- Increase Focus on Metrics That Matter: As opposed to being a cost center, marketing is increasingly being looked upon to generate revenue and to be able to show the impact of their programs. Measurements such as marketing ROI, incremental revenue lift, lifetime value and internal rate of return are all metrics that matter to the CEO and CFO and need to be built into all revenue strategies. In addition, where the sales cycle is longer, marketing is now expected to develop Demand Generation programs as opposed to simply lead generation initiatives, nurturing leads much farther in the sales funnel with an eye towards the final sale. I covered the new sales funnel in my blog post on February 26.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























