Zions Bank Continues to Improve Onboarding Process by Expanding Channels and Touches

Instead of simply sending a single letter to new account openers to thank them for their business, Zions Bank has expanded their onboarding program to include a 30 day 'engagement' mailing and a 60 day 'cross-sell' mailing. In addition, they utilize their centralized call center for follow-up and reach all new customers with email to reinforce the written communication. This integrated focus towards new customer communication has resulted in a significant reduction in new customer attrition and enhanced cross-sales of services.

Online Customers Aren't the Only Target for Mobile Banking Services

While attending the 2009 Mobile Financial Services Congress in Miami a little over a month ago, there was a consistent message from almost all of the speakers that a mobile banking customer is less likely to attrite, more likely to use additional engagement services such as bill pay, and less costly to serve.

Interstingly, it was also emphasized that while most banks have promoted the use of mobile banking to their current online banking customers, the real financial benefit is realized when a customer who is not as heavy a user of online banking is converted to the mobile channel. In other words, it makes stronger financial sense to try to segment offline customers and implement a proactive channel migration strategy to convert channel usage.


Some of the presenters at the Mobile Financial Services Congress suggested that offline customers who are quickly purchasing the newest wave of smart phones may actually bypass the online channel in favor of mobile banking services.

M-Com and Fiserv presented the findings from recent research that reinforced this trend. Nearly two-thirds of those surveyed reported contacting their financial institution once a week or more through traditional bank channels. Nearly half of survey respondents use their bank's call center or interactive voice response to help manage their finances. These are among the costliest channels for the bank to support, with each call center transaction costing an average of $3.75 and each automated voice response system transactions costing an average of $1.25. Conversion of even a small percentage of these transactions to the mobile channel would bring high returns. The study also found that the offline customer not only is aware of mobile banking (70%), but also have an interest in these services (60%). The primary area of interest is in checking balances (46%), contacting customer service (37%) or locating a nearby ATM or branch (30%).

It is clear there is a tremendous untapped opportunity for converting offline customers to the mobile channel with enhanced targeting, expanded enrollment opportunities (channels other than online) and improved communication of benefits of this channel. The banks that are the most aggressive in reaching out to these households will reap the greatest rewards

Segment Your Customer Base For Reg E Communications

The recent changes to Reg. E, impacting how financial institutions can levy fees for overdrafts caused by one time debit card or ATM transaction, have created a period of both challenge and opportunity for financial institutions. Due to the almost certain negative impact on a bank’s fee revenue and potential customer confusion about this new regulation, it is important to be able to effectively and efficiently implement these new requirements, maximizing account holder opt-in responses while providing a positive customer experience.

In this month's ABA Bank Marketing Magazine, Robert Giltner from Velocity Solutions suggests that financial institutions should start their communications process with a mass mail and email campaign to all customers explaining the new regulation. While I agree that all customers should be provided a clear understanding of their options, I don't agree that an all encompassing direct mailing should be done from a cost perspective.

Every customer should not be treated the same. Research shows that while most customers do not like the fees associated with overdrafts, there is a percentage that rely on overdraft coverage to meet current expenses or avoid embarrassment caused by inadequate record-keeping. To achieve the highest possible opt-in response at the lowest possible cost, I believe a segmented and integrated communications process should be used, leveraging multiple communication and response channels and focusing resources where they will have the greatest impact.

Instead of treating all account holders the same, most financial institutions I have talked to will be communicating most aggressively to the 10-15% of the customers who have the highest incidence of overdrafts, connecting with those households that the FDIC found to be the highest users (and fee generators) in their 2008 Study of Bank Overdraft Programs.

Some firms are even trying to determine which owner on an account is responsible for the majority of the overdrafts. By using all available communication channels (direct mail, statement inserts, email, POS, phone, and branch level communication), banks are hoping to communicate the benefits of opting-in to the customer, thereby minimizing the fee income impact of the regulation while improving the customer experience. The majority of the customers who do not overdraft their accounts will be more efficiently reached using a series of statement inserts, statement messages, branch level POS, ATM messaging, email, etc as opposed to postal mail.

I believe the most difficult challenge may be after the regulation takes effect in August, when customers who were not frequent overdrafters experience their first rejected ATM transaction or debit card purchase.

BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum Recap

I just finished presenting at the second BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum in Chicago where close to 50 financial institutions learned about legislative changes, customer perceptions, new product development and marketing opportunities around the checking account. While only a month has passed since the first Checking 2.0 Executive Forum held in Atlanta, it is obvious that there are a number of changes occurring in the marketplace.

There was consensus among the participants that while consumer trust and confidence in banks has been negatively impacted by the events of the past two years, there may be some uptick in these measures over the next few months if financial results continue to improve and if banks continue to focus on the customer experience.


A significant change from the March event was that virtually all of the participating banks have developed an alternative version of 'Free Checking'. Checking account product innovation has added stipulations to some accounts, benefits for a fee on others and alternative reward structures on other checking programs. In fact, in a quick survey of the participating banks, it did not appear that any of the 'Free Checking' programs were similar.

When discussions moved to how banks are responding to Reg E, there were some organizations that were well on their way towards communicating with their customer base while other banks had not yet begun their information dissemination. Surprisingly, MB Financial out of Chicago shared that they had already achieved close to 85% opt-in from their customer base (and nearly 100% from new customers) by leveraging a combination of postcards, traditional direct mail, phone call follow-up and branch level involvement.

The success of some of the participating banks illustrated the importance of a multi-channel communication process with strong employee involvement and call center follow-up.

Reg E Opt In Results Better Than Expected

As I travel across the country and talk to bankers about their early Reg E opt-in results, many are experiencing significantly higher than expected acceptance rates. In fact, some banks have indicated that they have achieved opt-in rates of as high as 85% or more from the highest impacted segments (those who have the highest use of overdraft coverage) and more than 95% from new customers who are opening a new account.

This level of acceptance should provide some comfort to financial institutions who have been concerned about a massive outflow of fee income as a result of Reg E beginning on August 15. Alternatively, this level of opt in sets the bar rather high for those organizations who have either not begun their Reg E communication or had thrown in the towel expecting customers to opt out on a massive basis.


In talking to those bankers who have achieved best-in-class results, here are the consistent strategies for success:

• Connect with customers using as many channels as possible - While response to statement inserts, direct mail and ATMs has not been as strong as the outbound telephone, 1:1 branch contact and email channel, the most successful banks have used all channels to provide a clear understanding of the regulation and to generate response.
• Use all outbound phone capabilities available - When a direct connection is made with a customer discussing the option of 'keeping their coverage the same' and 'having the assurance of no surprises', success rates have approached 90+%. Banks are using all of the resources possible to make these calls, including branch call nights, outsourced providers and leveraging inbound call resources.
• Expand communication beyond high opportunity segments - Instead of only connecting with high OD households, the most successful organizations are reaching out to all of their customers regarding opting in. While not having the same immediate financial impact, this communication emphasis will avoid potential negative customer experiences in the future.

As a result of the strong results achieved to date by those banks who started early, most of the financial institutions I have talked to have communication strategies that extend well beyond August 15. While the regulation takes effect on that date, most banks are going to continue mailing and call efforts until they have reached as many households as possible. Obviously, knowing that an 80+% acceptance rate is possible provides the financial incentive to not approach this effort casually.