Online Customers Aren't the Only Target for Mobile Banking Services

While attending the 2009 Mobile Financial Services Congress in Miami a little over a month ago, there was a consistent message from almost all of the speakers that a mobile banking customer is less likely to attrite, more likely to use additional engagement services such as bill pay, and less costly to serve.

Interstingly, it was also emphasized that while most banks have promoted the use of mobile banking to their current online banking customers, the real financial benefit is realized when a customer who is not as heavy a user of online banking is converted to the mobile channel. In other words, it makes stronger financial sense to try to segment offline customers and implement a proactive channel migration strategy to convert channel usage.


Some of the presenters at the Mobile Financial Services Congress suggested that offline customers who are quickly purchasing the newest wave of smart phones may actually bypass the online channel in favor of mobile banking services.

M-Com and Fiserv presented the findings from recent research that reinforced this trend. Nearly two-thirds of those surveyed reported contacting their financial institution once a week or more through traditional bank channels. Nearly half of survey respondents use their bank's call center or interactive voice response to help manage their finances. These are among the costliest channels for the bank to support, with each call center transaction costing an average of $3.75 and each automated voice response system transactions costing an average of $1.25. Conversion of even a small percentage of these transactions to the mobile channel would bring high returns. The study also found that the offline customer not only is aware of mobile banking (70%), but also have an interest in these services (60%). The primary area of interest is in checking balances (46%), contacting customer service (37%) or locating a nearby ATM or branch (30%).

It is clear there is a tremendous untapped opportunity for converting offline customers to the mobile channel with enhanced targeting, expanded enrollment opportunities (channels other than online) and improved communication of benefits of this channel. The banks that are the most aggressive in reaching out to these households will reap the greatest rewards

Mobile Banking Can Improve Customer Acquisition by Sixty Percent

One of the more startling takeaways from the Mobile Banking and Emerging Applications Summit this week was when Bob Hedges from Mercatus mentioned that mobile financial services could improve customer acquisition rates by as much as 60% in key customer segments (age under 50) for early moving banks. In fact, according the research findings which were presented at blinding speed at the conference, a bank's mobile presence was more important than online banking, ATM presence or even the convenience of local branches in a customer's decision to select a bank.

Combined with the statistic that more than 30% of U.S. consumers are either using or considering using mobile financial services in the next year, and it is understandable why the best quote from Hedges at the conference was that, "Making a business case for mobile banking is like making a business case for oxygen"!

Other findings shared by Hedges at the conference included that mobile financial services users have higher incomes than traditional customers, use more services and have up to 12% lower attrition (which has been supported by other findings provided by banks recently at other conferences).

Finally, Hedges emphasized to the more than 300 bankers in attendance that the rate at which consumers are adopting mobile banking is must faster than originally anticipated, with an expectation that the number of mobile banking consumers could surpass those who use online banking by 2015.

Given the positive impact that introducing the mobile channel could have on acquisition efforts, servicing costs, utilization of services and attrition, there is no doubt that mobile banking will be emphasized by banks over the next 18 months. Obviously, the spoils will go to those fast moving banks that can introduce mobile banking to their customers and prospects the quickest and who can continue to promote and enhance their offerings to a increasingly technology driven target audience.

Mobile Banking Summit Illustrates Topic is Hot

You don't need to look any further than the attendee list to realize the importance of mobile banking to our industry. Not only is almost every major institution in attendance at this year's Mobile Banking and Emerging Applications Summit, but the number of participants has increased by more than 50% according to officials from SourceMedia.

The program kicked off Sunday with a workshop by David Eads, Founder & CEO of Mobile Strategy Partners LLC where he discussed the basics of getting a Mobile Banking strategy off the ground. He also shared the first of a wave of industry statistics that made it clear to the SRO attendees that this year and next will be pivotal to the mobile banking industry. He also shared keys to developing a business case for introducing mobile banking. He emphasized that while cost reduction (mainly from offloaded balance inquiry calls) could many time justify the investment in mobile banking by itself. a drop in attrition and an increase in revenue from increased interchange and cross-sales will also improve the ROI.


A parade of speakers including Pam Joseph and other players from U. S. Bank, Bob Hedges from Mercatus, several panel discussions, and Jeff Dennes from USAA provided an amazing array of customer research, case studies and predictions for the future of this channel. During the U.S. Bank presentation, there was discussion of a new Mobile Shopping Concierge application where coupons, offers and even store layouts may be provided and the discussion of upcoming introductions of both a Remote Deposit Capture application as well as a P2P application (probably the most discussed new application of the day from many organizations including Bank of the West).

The best line of the day came from Bob Hedges, who began his presentation of a ton of industry research by saying, "Making a business case for mobile banking is like making a business case for oxygen"! One of the more unusual moments came from 10-11 AM PT, when it was obvious many in attendance were using their phones (and a surprising number of iPads) to get immediate updates on today's speech by Steve Jobs. Another helpful use of phones came throughout the day when pictures were taken of the slides in the presentations  by many since SourceMedia does not include the presentations in the conference materials, and then only partially share presentations 2-3 weeks after the event.

I will be digging much deeper into my notes over the next couple days to share insights from this great conference that ends tomorrow. In addition to key research, I will be sharing marketing ideas that were discussed as well as significant trends that we will probably see in 2010 and 2011.

By the way, for those unable to attend, the location of the conference was at the M Resort which was beautiful, but seemed like it was in LA due to the distance from the strip and the temperatures today approached 110 degrees. So yes, the conference was HOT!

What is the Future of the Branch?

When was the last time you went into a branch to do any banking outside of opening a new account, closing an account, getting a mortgage or doing a mystery shop? Better yet, did you even go into the branch to establish your last financial services relationship? For me, I most recently opened a Virtual Wallet Relationship and never saw a banker in person. What was amazing about the experience is that I was 'cross-sold' a savings account, debit card, online banking, auto save and bill pay without ever feeling like I was sold or talking to a banker. I did it myself . . . all online.

So, what is the future of the bank branch? According to a channel preference survey conducted by the American Bankers Association (ABA) last August, 25 percent of consumers preferred to bank online as opposed to any other channel.
For the first time, this channel preference exceeded the desire to bank in a branch office. And, while consumers over 55 clearly preferred to use a branch, every other demographic group preferred the speed and convenience of the Internet.

It is interesting to note that even though the mobile channel is definitely a area of significant investment and interest in our industry (as noted by my blog on June 7), the adoption rate was only 1% in the survey, with much of the activity still being transactional in nature. Despite this, Bank of America has opened more than 4 million mobile banking relationships.

In a recent set of blogs by industry pundit Brett King entitled, Branch Networks: Where Do We Go From Here? (Part 1 and Part 2), he makes a very strong case for banks reorganizing to make their organization structure channel agnostic. In much the same way that most industry experts believe product silos should be torn down in favor of customer segment management, King makes the case for having channel managers all as equal peers with the focus on the customer and an eye on how money is actually transferred among the channels, how the channels are used and how revenue is generated.

King also indicates that the branches as we know them today need to change in both form and function. With a core function of the daily branch operation concentrating on check processing, and with the number of checks written dropping while technology such as business and personal Remote Deposit Capture is increasing, something needs to change. We are already seeing the architecture of new branches change, with more specialized sales/service offices surrounding a smaller transactional lobby. But even these sales and service offices could be remote, and most of the transactions done today are too costly to be handled using expensive real estate.

Eventually, we will probably see different channel strategies such as Huntington Bank's strategy of expanding branch hours on weekdays and opening on Sundays or possibly branches that resemble an Apple retail store where the focus is on customer engagement and specialized service and where transactions are more of a by-product. The focus on new strategies is even part of this Fall's BAI Retail Delivery Conference where there will be a Multi-Channel Strategy Summit led by representatives from Novantis and M&T Bank.

Whatever strategies are selected, it appears the days of expanding branch networks are gone and we will see an emphasis on consolidation, optimization and the leveraging of new technology to integrate the branch as part of a broader and improved customer experience. As Brett King said in his recent blog, " . . . it's time to start to think out of the box".

How is your bank changing their delivery channel emphasis?

Banks Need to Build Foundation for Effective Multichannel Marketing

While the BAI Retail Delivery Conference in Las Vegas doesn't officially begin until today, hundreds of attendees participated in a series of pre-conference workshops, including a session entitled, "Improving Acquisition, Onboarding and Cross-Sell Effectiveness with Multichannel Communication" which I was lucky enough to present with Matt Wilcox from Zions Bank and Tal Harry from Richter7. The workshop was attended by representatives from banks of all sizes and in various stages of multichannel marketing development.

During the session, we had several formal and informal surveys to determine where this limited cross section of the banking industry was with regard to their marketing mix.

Interestingly, while the majority of the banks are regularly using web banners and email as part of their marketing initiatives, less than 25% use paid search or jump pages with their campaigns. Even more surprising:

• Almost half of the banks in attendance still do not have a formal, multi-step onboarding program. This is surprising given the amount of attention given this strategy in the trade press and with market leaders over the past several years.
• While only about half the participating banks routinely collect email addresses, more than two thirds collect mobile phone numbers. This is most likely a result of IT challenges in setting up capture methods for email vs. another phone number box. The current level of email address pollination within the databases for the banks in attendance was still less than 30% on average.
• Only a very small handful of banks in attendance ask a new customer what their preferred channel of communication is. This is both a potential missed sales channel opportunity and a customer experience shortfall.
• Almost half of those at our session have used web video as a communications tool, about the same number are using Facebook, while less than 25% have used Twitter or YouTube.

An overarching takeaway was that, while most of the banks in attendance are doing dual channel marketing, few are integrating multiple channels for improved marketing effectiveness. With budgets either staying the same or being reduced in 2011, it will be more important than ever to optimize marketing channel investments through the testing of new media and even social channels. At the same time, banks will need to focus on the basics (such as the capture of email addresses and determining customer's commnication channel preferences) while setting the foundation for improved measurement of channel effectiveness.

Thanks to all of the banks that attended our session yesterday and especially to Matt and Tal for their exceptional insights that they shared with in the workshop.

An Open Letter to BankSimple

On January 18, you impressed me when Rachel Giuliani from BankSimple wrote an email to me unexpectedly asking me for my "loves, hates, quibbles, hopes and dreams" regarding my financial life. Her email seemed surprisingly personal coming from a bank I had signed up to be part of a beta test several months earlier. In her letter, she piqued my interest when she told me she represented a 'new' bank that was committed to building the best possible customer service without surprises.

Her timing was great since I had been a bit upset with my current bank. Not only had my bank changed their fee structure without a clear notification, but they seemed to be looking for new ways to generate fees for actions I had become accustomed to not paying for. Sure, I could avoid the fees as I had in the past by maintaining a steady balance in my account, but even that had been raised to a level that really didn't correspond to the value I felt I was receiving from the bank.

You made it so easy for me to respond to Rachel's email since she even provided her email address (rachel@banksimple.com). And, as opposed to feeling like my response would end up in some black hole of customer service or would be responded to by a person not even named Rachel, it was easy to see that my new pen pal had been hired just a week earlier as the first of two customer service representatives to provide 'brilliant customer service'.

I was definitely impressed that almost immediately after a wrote my email to Rachel late at night, she responded within 10 minutes! I was falling in love with your bank even though it hadn't opened yet. I was so impressed that I immediately tweeted about my experience, spoke about my dialogue with Rachel at conferences, and posted a blog entry about my new friend from your bank on this site (A Little Note From Bank Simple, January 18, 2011). That blog post generated by far more traffic than any post I have done before or after. Talk about word of mouth marketing (WOMM)!

As with any new relationship, there were some of my friends (Ron Shevlin) who were naysayers. They said it I was getting my hopes up that the communication between Rachel and I would continue. They said that the proof of a good relationship is in the long term communication and caring, and not just a single series of emails. They said I was getting my hopes up that I had found a new bank and that I might be setting myself up for being disappointed.

I am starting to believe they were right. Not only has Rachel seemed to move on to other friends as your team has grown, but the promises of a great, new banking experience that she spoke of remain just a promise. Maybe my optimistic personality got the best of me again. Sure, your leader Josh Reich tells me about the fact that you have received a lot of new funding and that you have found new corporate partners in Visa, some banks and even TXVia. You even got my hopes up when you hired Alex Payne from Twitter. but it has been 6 months since Rachel last wrote and the only time I hear about BankSimple now is through traditional press releases and trade publication interviews.

Much like in the movie Jerry Maguire, where Renee Zellweger says that Tom Cruise 'had her at hello', you really had me at 'simple'. But now, there are other banks that are starting to look a lot like how you once looked. You have competition in existing banks like Ally, and ING where there are no fees, easy access and even interest on my accounts. You also have a new competitor coming down the road that is compared to you every time they talk to industry insiders. Brett King's MoveNBank seems to be looking for friends also, allowing me to be part of their beta group in 2012. There are some of my friends like Jim Bruene from NetBanker who wonder if MoveNBank may even 'outsimplify BankSimple.

So when is Rachel, Josh, Alex and the rest of your team going to let me see more than promises? I know you have moved to a new headquarters, but to say I am ready is an understatement. Since January, my old bank (yes, I switched once already) has raised fees and cut back the value they provide again, with many of the other large banks following suit thanks to Durbin and other pressures.

If you are not quite ready to let me kick the tires or take your bank for a ride around the block, the least you could do is have Rachel write me again and assume me that our potential relationship is still alive. Otherwise, I will consider the great communication 6 months ago a nice experience, but also another lesson that all banks are alike when it comes to customer service and promises. They love to tease you, but when it comes to delivering on a promise, they fall short.

Please write.

If not you, maybe some of my blog followers can either assure me that I should remain patient or that I should move on.

Consumers Are Increasingly Using Multiple Devices to Support Banking Needs

Traditional bricks and mortar facilities are being visited less as the use and importance of online and mobile devices continues to increase according to Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey released yesterday. According to the survey, while a large percentage of consumers still manage their finances offline (45%), the percentage of consumers using online services from their financial institution has continued to increase annually; increasing 11% since 2009 to 38% in 2011.

The main reason consumers said that they don't visit their bank branch as often as they used to is because they are visiting their FI's website and use their online banking tools (76%). These online banking tools are so important that one-third (33%) said they would switch their relationship to another institution if there were better online tools offered elsewhere.

Source: Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey

The importance of online tools was reinforced by Brett King, author of the bestseller Bank 2.0 and founder of direct mobile banking start-up Movenbank at this year's BAI Retail Delivery Conference in Chicago. "Banking is quickly changing from a place you go to something you do everyday," stated King. He provided a chart from the American Bankers Association and Nielsen Research that illustrated the channel migration occurring today and projected in the future.

Source: ABA, Nielsen Research

It appears that the growth of mobile banking is only limited by the growth of ownership of a smartphone according to the Intuit study. Forty-one percent of all respondents indicated ownership of a smartphone, 23% said they used a mobile banking solution, and an additional 17% intend to try mobile banking in 2012. The primary reason consumers indicated that they do not use mobile banking was because they do not own a smartphone (25%) followed by the fact that they prefer to bank online (22%).

Source: Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey

These findings are similar to the findings last week from comScore that drew a correlation between mobile banking and smartphone adoption. "The investments in mobile made by financial service institutions, along with the continued growth in smartphone adoption, have had a positive effect on the use of mobile financial services," states Sarah Lenart comScore vice president for marketing solutions.

As expected, the adoption rate of mobile banking is demographically skewed. Young adults (aged 18-32) are three times more likely to carry their bank in their pocket, compared to Gen X, baby boomers or seniors. And while 65% of mobile banking users access their accounts through the internet/Web, 28% use a mobile application. "Regardless of age, each customer expects to connect to their financial institution in their own way," said CeCe Morken, president and general manager of Intuit Financial Services.

In another Intuit study of more than 50,000 mobile banking customers, it was found that consumers tend to interact with their financial institution 45% more often if they use a combination of both mobile and online tools. These customer also tended to have larger relationships and a better retention rate.

"While we anticipate that there will be some mobile-only consumers, most people will be using multiple devices on any given day in the future," said Intuit spokesperson Tobin Lee in a conversation yesterday. "Financial institutions must be prepared to deliver financial information and insights across multiple devices (PC, phone, tablet), optimized to the merits of each device it they are going to meet customer's needs. If they don't, someone else will . . . probably displacing a bank's relationship."

The desire for 'anywhere app access' is also supported by a just released study from Oracle entitled, Opportunity Calling: The Future of Mobile Communications - Part Two which found that while there was a stronger preference to use a tablet for mobile banking (34%) compared to a mobile phone (11%), the majority of consumers (55%) would prefer to use both devices. This is important to prepare for since the same study found that almost 30% of the U.S. mobile customers that do not already have a tablet device plan to purchase one in the next 12 months. These findings were also reinforced in last April's, Intuit 2020 Report: The Future of Financial Services.

As customers continue to use multiple channels to connect with their bank, it will be increasingly important to have a 360-degree view of customer device touch points and to leverage the advantages of each device to provide an optimum customer experience. The current anxiety over online and mobile security needs to be addressed at the same time as innovations such as near field communication (NFC) and location based services get integrated into online and mobile solutions. Bankers will need to get ahead of the payments innovation curve and prepare for major distribution channel disruption. In short, banks will need to do a paradigm shift by becoming nimble at a time of increased regulation and consumer scrutiny.

Are today's banks prepared for the massive changes ahead? Or will new online organizations such as Ally, BankSimple, Movenbank and others steal the hearts and wallets of Gen Y and device savvy consumers?

I would love to hear from you.

The Impact of the iPhone 5 on Bank Marketing

So, the anticipation is over and the newest version of the iPhone has been introduced. When all was said and done, there were few surprises left as to what the iPhone 5 would offer, and for those of us who were crossing our fingers for the possibility of NFC integration (and further payments disruption), there may have even been a bit of disappointment.

And while additional enhancements to the Passbook app provides a glimpse into the potential for a head on competition with Google Wallet for payments supremacy in the future, the shop-with-your-phone coupon capability is not applicable to most bank marketers. What should be of more importance to bank marketers is the additional marketing real estate provided with the new phone and the growth in sales that may be on the horizon.

Bank marketers should see promise with the iPhone 5's larger, 4-inch screen with Retina display which provides 18% more pixels for delivering enhanced mobile ads, banners, landing pages and interactive campaigns. While the extra pixels may not seem like much, it moves the iPhone experience closer to that of the iPad, which has already proven itself to be a major tool for consumer consumption. And for those who are still tablet-less, it is possible that this new device will a bridge for engaged behavior.



According to Rachel Pasqua, vice president of mobile at digital agency iCrossing, "the enlarged iPhone is enough to make mobile creative a little more eye catching and get more users more deeply engaged." She mentioned that there will also be less potential for mis-clicks leading to better potential interaction. The potential for greater speed through the LTE and the new iOS6 also will help.

Charles Golvin from Forrester Research noted in a recent post that while other competitors already offer a larger canvas in some cases, "Apple still outpaces the competition when it comes to the entire package -- the new iPhone unites significant improvements in industrial design, imaging, audio and connectivity, along with the wealth of new capabilities that iOS6 enables."

The key for bank marketers is that iPhone 5 users, and smartphone users overall, will be spending more time with content on their phone. It is therefore important to provide the level of content that optimizes both the customer experience and marketing potential of the new devices. Consumers are no longer content with static web pages and difficult to use links and landing pages. Content (web pages, banners, ads, landing pages, etc.) will need to be easier to interact with and be more dynamic. 

There is no way of knowing how popular the new iPhone 5 will be in the marketplace, but if the past is any indication of the future, not only will many current iPhone users upgrade to the new model, but the overall iPhone penetration will increase as well. As shown below, nearly 2 in 5 of the 38.2 million Americans using iPhones are on the iPhone 4, which was released just 2 years ago. More impressive than that is the fact that 35% of iPhone users today are on the iPhone 4S, which was introduced less than 12 months ago.

Just as with the tablet, bank marketers should realize that simply 'super sizing' a current app or website is no longer enough from the customer's perspective. It is important to leverage the tools and advancements that are available with the newest generation of phones. 

And even though our industry does not have products that are as visually appealing as in retail and other industries, the challenge to differentiate our offerings may be greater, but the opportunity is still significant. 

Are Bankers Ready For The Bank 3.0 Reality?

In an exclusive interview about his newest book, Bank 3.0, Brett King discusses how change occurring in the banking industry is inevitable, speeding up and disruptive. 

From the mobile wallet wars to the impact of social media, tablets and the 'de-banked' and digital consumer, Bank 3.0 shows why banking is no longer a place you go to, but something you do.

A great deal has happened since Brett King wrote Bank 2.0 in 2010. Two years ago, banks were under siege as the foundation of the banking system was close to collapse and the image of the industry as a safe and secure environment was being challenged. The impact of social media was just beginning to be understood by the financial services industry and mobile technology as we know it today was in its infancy. Heck, King even referenced his (now long gone) Blackberry in the first chapter of Bank 2.0.

With Bank 3.0, King discusses how consumers are less likely to view their retail banking provider in terms of capital adequacy, branch network, products and rates. Instead, customers are more likely to determine their banking partners by how easily they can access their accounts when they need to, and how much they trust their provider to execute business on their behalf. For those who read Bank 2.0, King's new book retains some of the foundation and case studies, but updates several areas based on what has occurred (and will be occurring) relative to digital delivery, payments, social media, and the power of 'big data'.

On the eve of the introduction of Bank 3.0 in the U.K. (introduction in the U.S. is scheduled for early November), I interviewed Brett King about his new book and about how he views the banking industry today.

What has occurred in the marketplace that warranted the publishing of Bank 3.0 just 2 years after your successful book, Bank 2.0?

Brett King: The marketplace has changed significantly around how consumers are engaging with their financial institutions. Compared to two years ago, traditional banks are challenged more than ever from a distribution perspective because of the movement to mobile and digital channels, and because they are not well positioned with their current bricks and mortar networks for a positive customer experience. 

The philosophy of banks, with their secure firewalls, operational structure and compliance mindset, is counter to how any other industry engages with customers in the digital space. Since Bank 2.0, the competitive environment has also changed a great deal, with partnerships being developed, alternative players and new bank start-ups being introduced, underbanked segments emerging, and social media merging with bank service engagement. People are beginning to take a functional and utility view of banking, which is why I say in the subtitle of the new book, 'banking is no longer a place you go to, but something you do'.

In Bank 3.0, you discuss that despite these marketplace and behavioral changes, traditional banks in the U.S. have made only minor changes to their distribution models. Where do you see bank branch distribution going in the near and mid-term?


Brett King: We have already seen a number of new players enter the market, especially in the payments space such as Isis, Square, PayPal, Google Wallet, etc. In addition, prepaid cards have become much more popular and represent the fastest growing deposit product in the U.S. This is significant since most bankers do not consider the product to be 'real banking'. From the consumer's perspective, however, prepaid cards are real banking. This is the mistake traditional bookstores and movie distributors made when new distribution alternatives emerged. They didn't take the challenge seriously. Bankers need to realize that prepaid cards are changing the way people are viewing bank relationships on the grassroots level. 

Finally, as transactions continue to migrate to online and mobile channels, we will see more and more banks reconfigure their traditional branches to reflect the new digital reality, with many banks also starting to close unproductive (and economically deficient) branches. These trends will only escalate going forward due to the costs of delivery and the reduced revenue potential.

No new U.S. bank charters have been issued in the recent past. What challenges are faced by start-ups like Movenbank related to regulations and other outdated barriers to entry?

Brett King: The challenges we've had have not been from regulators, but from the risk and compliance areas of the financial organizations we are trying to partner with. In fact, we've met with the Fed, the Treasury and the CFPB and they have all been overwhelmingly supportive of what we are doing. They understand the changes occurring in the marketplace, and have liked the financial literacy built into our product, our engagement model and the value we bring to the overall banking experience.

Alternatively, the banks themselves are having difficulty innovating . . . moving from the way they have done things in the past, using paper applications, signature cards, etc. to using web signatures and online authentication (which is much safer).

Do you see the cost of mobile innovation discussed in Bank 3.0 being an additional 'market disrupter' impacting the ability for smaller institutions to succeed and ultimately survive?

Brett King: The problem is that there are so many start-ups in the financial services and payments space that are impacting the way people view financial services that significant technology projects need to be undertaken by traditional banks just to keep pace. Investing in a technology layer, combined with the new costs of compliance, will be a challenge for smaller institutions. That doesn't eliminate the potential for smaller organizations to collaborate or to build partnerships to respond to market realities, but I don't see this happening.

With the rapid acceptance of tablets, how do you see tablets changing the way people do banking and the services banks may provide leveraging this technology?

Brett King: As we have seen in the retail space already, mobile will change the context of banking including where and how a consumer conducts business. For instance, the process of buying a home and securing a mortgage becomes much different when the shopping for the mortgage is done online significantly before a customer enters a branch (if they do so at all). A tablet can also provide a rich user experience due to the real estate of this device compared to a smartphone and the tactile capabilities compared to online interaction.

Turning this around, if a customer can get this experience on a tablet, why can't that level of experience be replicated at the ATM, as part of online banking and even in the branch? In the end, I think the growth in tablets will force banks to build enhanced customer experiences across all channels.

You have a section in your book dedicated to the impact of social media in financial services. How do you see social media changing banking in the future?

Brett King: Currently social media is impacting banking in a couple ways, including servicing and social dialogue. Customers are increasingly expecting to be able to reach their bank regarding service issues using Facebook or Twitter and get a response immediately. Many banks are falling short in this area, not providing adequate support for 24/7 social channel access.

In addition, consumers are using social media to follow and engage in dialogue about brands (both positively and negatively). If a brand performs well, this can lead to advocacy which in turn can lead to referrals and new business. This positive dialogue becomes critical in restoring trust in an individual bank's brand.

At the end of each chapter in your book, you provide key lessons and recommendations for banks willing to embrace change and take advantage of market opportunities. What is the biggest risk facing traditional banks as they move forward?

Brett King: The biggest risk facing traditional banks is the distribution and cultural bias towards physical branches. The difficulty in unwinding this investment is extremely difficult due the vast scale of branch networks. How do you turn such a ship in such a short time when you are so used to doing things in a certain manner? Leasing and rental contracts present a hurdle, but changing the branch-based culture at most banks may be a bigger challenge.

Your book contains dozens of case studies and references to financial institutions around the world that are innovating and developing new ways to engage with customers. Where is the greatest banking innovation occurring today?

Brett King: The countries that I believe are the best at this would include Australia, many of the Latin American countries like Brazil, some of the countries in the EU including some of the Danish banks and Swedish banks. In my opinion, the U.S. is definitely at a disadvantage due to their over investing in branch networks. The non-banks and new start-ups provide the best examples of innovation in the states."

Commonwealth Bank of Australia - Kaching Facebook Banking

Bank 3.0 is about the transition from banking dependent on a physical structure to banking that can be done at a time and place most convenient to the customer. It is about a new form of engagement and experience that harnesses the power of the internet without sacrificing the 'human touch'. It is about leveraging the potential of big data for better 1:1 interactions and more powerful marketing. 

Brett King's newest book emphasizes that consumer behavior is changing faster than ever before and that banks need to decide if they will embrace the change or be a victim of the change. Innovation and experimentation are no longer an option. They are the only way to do business.

Bank 3.0 was released today in the U.K. and is scheduled to be released in the U.S. in early November. In addition, Brett King mentioned that he will be offering free copies of his new book to Twitter followers over the next couple weeks on a first tweet, first served basis. Brett's Twitter handle is @BrettKing.

As Online Banking Acceptance Grows Is Mobile Banking Reaching the Tipping Point With Millenials?

A new survey by the American Bankers Association (ABA) found that for the fourth year in a row, consumers named the Internet as their favorite way of conducting banking business, with 39 percent of respondents saying it is the method they 'use most often to manage (their) bank account(s).'  The second most popular way to bank – visiting a branch – continued its downward trend to 18 percent from 30 percent in 2008.

In addition, this year’s survey showed a sharp increase in the popularity of mobile banking, driven mainly by customers in the 18 to 34-year-old age group. Use of the mobile channel by millennials escalated from 4 percent in 2010 to 15 percent this year. Conversely, the use of branches by this age group during the four-year period dropped from 20 percent to 11 percent, with ATM use also dropping from 32 percent to 14 percent. Overall, mobile banking is now preferred by six percent of customers, a 100 percent increase from 2010.

The distribution of primary channel use this year was as follows:

• Internet Banking (laptop or PC) – 39% (36% in 2010)
• Branches – 18% (25% in 2010)
• ATMs – 12% (15% in 2010)
• Mail – 8% (8% in 2010)
• Telephone - 9% (6% in 2010)
• Mobile (cell phone, Blackberry, PDA, I-Pad, etc.) – 6% (3% in 2010)

Online banking first became the most preferred banking method in 2009 with 25 percent of customers naming it as their favorite. Previously, visiting a branch was the most popular method, followed by ATMs. “The survey results show consumers have a clear preference for the speed and convenience that come with Internet and mobile banking,” said Nessa Feddis, ABA senior counsel and retail banking expert. “However, banks are committed to serving the needs of all customers regardless of which method they prefer,” she added.

Even the oldest demographic segment surveyed (55+) is moving away from branch visits and towards online and mobile channels. As shown below, the 61 percent of the oldest segment preferred branches and ATMs in 2008, while this preference dropped to 37 percent in this year's results. And, while mobile banking preference by this segment is still close to non-existent, internet banking has almost doubled over the past four years. 

Interestingly, this segment is the only group where bank-by-mail and telephone banking has increased consistently. In fact, telephone banking has increased during each period for all demographic segments, representing an opportunity to move many of these transactions to alternative (less expensive) channels.

“These results show customers are embracing new technologies that make managing a bank account simpler, easier and more convenient but that doesn’t mean that the traditional bank branch is going anywhere soon,” said Feddis.

“Branch design may evolve as a result of declining foot traffic. However, we know that nothing replaces human interaction and that’s why branches will never disappear,” she added.

The key going forward will be to encourage adoption the mobile channel by more than just the early adopters for more robust use beyond simple balance checking. According to the white paper developed by Fiserv a few months back entitled, "Breaking the Mobile Banking Glass Ceiling: Five Factors Will Drive Consumer Adoption," these early adopters may represent as much as 20% of eligible users.

To move beyond this 'tipping point', Fiserv recommends five factors to move mobile banking into the mainstream. These include:

• Establishing mobile banking as useful
• Providing access to mobile banking through all devices
• Helping consumers overcome security concerns
• Fostering familiarity for a natural transition across channels
• Making mobile banking easy to use

"Financial institutions have rushed to offer mobile banking during the last few years, and many now realize that driving adoption is not just a ‘build it and they will come' proposition," said Kelly Rodriguez, vice president, Strategy and Business Development, Digital Channels, Fiserv. "In order to maximize return on investment, financial institutions need to engage both their staff and customers. This requires a proactive strategy for delivering mobile financial services and educating potential users on the benefits."

With the continued growth in smartphone ownership and the accompanying comfort level with all things digital and mobile, it is clear that mobile banking acceptance will continue to grow. The key to success will be to introduce marketing initiatives that will stimulate mobile banking utilization beyond the level which naturally occurs in the marketplace. This will require enhanced mobile capabilities, improved customer communication and a focus on the excellent win-win opportunity for both banks and customers.

Additional Resources:

Preferred Banking Method for ages 18-34 for the years 2008-2012 (PDF)

Preferred Banking Method for ages 35-54 for the years 2008-2012 (PDF)

Preferred Banking Method for ages 55+ for the years 2008-2012 (PDF)

Breaking the Mobile Banking Glass Ceiling- Fiserv 2012

The annual survey of channel preferences was conducted for the ABA by Ipsos Public Affairs, (an independent market research firm) on August 2-6, 2012. For the survey, a nationally representative sample of 1,000 randomly selected adults aged 18 and over residing in the U.S. were interviewed by telephone. This ensured survey accuracy within ±3.1 percentage points and reflected the demographic composition of the U.S.