Don't Forget Small Businesses With Your Reg E Communication

While small businesses are not impacted directly by Regulation E, many of the banks at the Atlanta BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum where I spoke last week indicated that they will be reaching out to their small business customers to explain the law and the potential impact on their retail business.

Not only do many smaller businesses use consumer checking accounts for their small business transactions (with the potential for debit card rejected transactions), but with the potential for so many customers of small businesses having payments for goods and services rejected after the implementation of Reg E, banks are communicating details around this consumer legislation and options as to how to deal with transactions that are rejected.

BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum Recap

I just finished presenting at the second BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum in Chicago where close to 50 financial institutions learned about legislative changes, customer perceptions, new product development and marketing opportunities around the checking account. While only a month has passed since the first Checking 2.0 Executive Forum held in Atlanta, it is obvious that there are a number of changes occurring in the marketplace.

There was consensus among the participants that while consumer trust and confidence in banks has been negatively impacted by the events of the past two years, there may be some uptick in these measures over the next few months if financial results continue to improve and if banks continue to focus on the customer experience.


A significant change from the March event was that virtually all of the participating banks have developed an alternative version of 'Free Checking'. Checking account product innovation has added stipulations to some accounts, benefits for a fee on others and alternative reward structures on other checking programs. In fact, in a quick survey of the participating banks, it did not appear that any of the 'Free Checking' programs were similar.

When discussions moved to how banks are responding to Reg E, there were some organizations that were well on their way towards communicating with their customer base while other banks had not yet begun their information dissemination. Surprisingly, MB Financial out of Chicago shared that they had already achieved close to 85% opt-in from their customer base (and nearly 100% from new customers) by leveraging a combination of postcards, traditional direct mail, phone call follow-up and branch level involvement.

The success of some of the participating banks illustrated the importance of a multi-channel communication process with strong employee involvement and call center follow-up.

Banks Can Accelerate Revenue Growth by Managing Digital Experience

According to the March issue of the McKinsey Quarterly, digital channels can assist companies in unifying the customer experience and help move customers from interest to loyalty. In the article, "Four Ways to Get More Value From Digital Marketing", David C. Edelman discusses how companies can increase revenues through a better coordination of the digital end-to-end experience (see exhibit).

By focusing on the capture of a larger amount of Internet traffic through improved mass media key word positioning and SEO, increasing customer engagement through easy to navigate sites and targeted messaging, converting more of the digital leads to sales with strong offers and building digital loyalty through online and offline channels, revenues can be optimized.

The article discusses how marketing investments need to be proportional to the influence they will have on the consumer's purchasing decision. But any shift in investment will only yield results if the channels are integrated and coordinated and if the appropriate metrics are established linking investment to performance. This may require marketers to move out of their comfort zone and to step back from tactical, day-to-day execution and take a more strategic view of where to invest and make changes.

Seven Predictions for the Future of Banking

Today, Susan Wolfe, Vice President of Financial Services from Mintel Comperemedia, presented a webinar entitled, "Seven Predictions for the Future of Banking" where she explored trends in the industry based on the research and direct marketing examples from their custom consumer surveys and mail panel. Each of these trends correlate with what I have seen in the marketplace even though many trends have been impacted by the massive influence Reg E has had on the focus of many bank marketing departments over the past few months.

The predictions presented in the Webinar were:

1. More Aggressive Focus on 'Relationship Banking': Even though trust in banks has waned lately, banks are emphasizing the building of a stronger relationship through integrated accounts like Fifth Third's Relationship Savings Account and with rewards programs like PNC Bank's points.
2. Increased Promotion of Account Builder Programs: Responding to a much higher savings rate, especially by higher income segments, new products are being introduced such as SmartCents by Capital One and U.S, Bank's S.T.A.R.T. program.
3. More Debit Card Marketing: With the loss of overdraft fee income, banks will encourage debit card use for automatic bill payments and will begin to share interchange income with per use rewards programs and sweepstakes.
4. Continued Importance of Incentives: As mentioned my recent Blog, incentives for opening new checking accounts have increased and are becoming more widespread. BBVA Compass also offers incentives through an offline and online refer-a-friend program.
5. Mobile Banking is the 'New' Online Banking: While the adoption of mobile banking currently is inversely correlated to age, this trend could easily reverse as offline sign-up expands and promotion of text messaging and electronic alerts increases. Bank of America has around 3 million subscribers with the majority using an iPhone or iTouch. Online money management tools also continue to become more sophisticated such as those from Mint.
6. Proliferation of Financial Literacy Programs: Banks are focusing efforts on new programs to help customers better understand and manage their finances such as Chase's Blueprint and Bank of America's financial education website.
7. Expanded Testing and Use of Social Media: Financial services firms continue to test ways to leverage social media such as American Express's online booking app on Faceboook, Bank of America's help page on Twitter, Chase's Facebook charitable giving event and Stagecoach Island from Wells Fargo.

Reg E Opt In Results Better Than Expected

As I travel across the country and talk to bankers about their early Reg E opt-in results, many are experiencing significantly higher than expected acceptance rates. In fact, some banks have indicated that they have achieved opt-in rates of as high as 85% or more from the highest impacted segments (those who have the highest use of overdraft coverage) and more than 95% from new customers who are opening a new account.

This level of acceptance should provide some comfort to financial institutions who have been concerned about a massive outflow of fee income as a result of Reg E beginning on August 15. Alternatively, this level of opt in sets the bar rather high for those organizations who have either not begun their Reg E communication or had thrown in the towel expecting customers to opt out on a massive basis.


In talking to those bankers who have achieved best-in-class results, here are the consistent strategies for success:

• Connect with customers using as many channels as possible - While response to statement inserts, direct mail and ATMs has not been as strong as the outbound telephone, 1:1 branch contact and email channel, the most successful banks have used all channels to provide a clear understanding of the regulation and to generate response.
• Use all outbound phone capabilities available - When a direct connection is made with a customer discussing the option of 'keeping their coverage the same' and 'having the assurance of no surprises', success rates have approached 90+%. Banks are using all of the resources possible to make these calls, including branch call nights, outsourced providers and leveraging inbound call resources.
• Expand communication beyond high opportunity segments - Instead of only connecting with high OD households, the most successful organizations are reaching out to all of their customers regarding opting in. While not having the same immediate financial impact, this communication emphasis will avoid potential negative customer experiences in the future.

As a result of the strong results achieved to date by those banks who started early, most of the financial institutions I have talked to have communication strategies that extend well beyond August 15. While the regulation takes effect on that date, most banks are going to continue mailing and call efforts until they have reached as many households as possible. Obviously, knowing that an 80+% acceptance rate is possible provides the financial incentive to not approach this effort casually.

Ten Steps to Onboarding Success

Later today, I am presenting at the Oregon Bankers Association 105th Anniversary Convention at Sunriver Resort on the topic, Stemming Attrition and Building Relationships Through Effective Onboarding.

In addition to sharing recent statistics from J.D. Power and Associates around the positive impact of increased attention early in a new relationship and the positive impact of using multiple communication channels from case studies across the banking industry, I will be sharing the ten key steps to onboarding success that I have seen over the past five years.


These ten steps are:

1. Acquire the right customers: The most important component of a successful onboarding program is to acquire customers that have a greater liklihood of future value based on modeling and geographic targeting.
2. Communicate early and often: The sooner you can build dialogue with the customer and the more often you can connect in the first 90 days, the more successful you will be in retaining and building relationships.
3. Integrate across multiple channels: Reaching out to the new customer using phone, direct mail, email and personal 1:1 communication will greatly improve the success of an onboarding program. We have seen lifts of 25-50% when multiple channels are used.
4. Build in learning from day one: An onboarding program should not run on auto pilot. The competitive environment, customer behaviors and transaction trends change all the time. Your onboarding program also needs to adjust on a dynamic basis.
5. Engagement is key: Cross-selling the new customer should not begin until after you encourage engagement with the new account. This can include direct deposit, online banking and bill payment, autosave, credit utilization, debit/credit card utilization, etc.
6. Build a cadence of communication: A successful onboarding program uses a sequence of communication to improve the customer experience by helping the customer understand their new account, get to know the bank brand and eventually build trust and a stronger relationship.
7. Develop personalized offers: Once the customer has demonstrated a satisfactory level of engagement with their new account, offers targeted to the specific needs of the customer should be communicated.
8. Use a test and learn mentality: Testing should always be done with an onboarding program to determine the right offers, timing, channels and cadence for each customer segment.
9. Measure results: Results should be measured consistently against a control group. Common metrics include changes in attrition, engagement, cross-selling, balances and satisfaction on both a customer and household basis.
10. Provide a single point of responsibility: Since most banks do not have Directors of Cross-Selling or VP of Retention, it is important to assign the onboarding process to a single person who will 'own' the development and impact of the onboarding process. This person will work with segments, product managers and marketing teams to ensure the success of your program.

There has never been a more important time to develop a successful onboarding program. With fee income being attacked by Reg E and net interest margins at historical low levels, it is imperative that financial organizations attract and keep customers with the highest potential lifetime value.

Thinking Like Your Customer

Yesterday, I received a thought provoking Harvard Business Review blog from Scott Anthony, Managing Director of Innosight Ventures entitled, Think and Act Like Your Customers, where he discussed that many marketers surround themselves with what they produce as opposed to placing themselves in the position of a customer of their competition.

He pondered the fact that we may receive lots competitive intelligence from research decks and market studies, but we sometimes miss the simplest form of insight that can be derived by having our employees (or ourselves) use the products and services of the competition.


This got me thinking as to how often bank marketers actually open a new account at the competition as opposed to simply doing shopping studies with a third party research firm. How else can we really get a feel for the new account opening process, the insight collection and selling done on the front line, the subsequent onboarding communication process and the communication done later in the relationship?

As Scott Anthony pointed out, we should determine what the competition has that is better than our bank? How do they position or communicate their offerings that may be of interest to our customers? Most importantly, if you were not an employee of your bank, would the offering of the competitor encourage you to select the competition as being your bank of choice?

Sometimes, there is nothing better (or more frightening) than seeing the truth for yourself.

What Bank Marketers Can Learn From Apple

After two and a half weeks of waiting, a lost FedEx delivery and an eventual call and visit to a local Apple store, I am finally the happy owner of a 32GB 3G iPad. While the delivery experience wasn't as smooth as I would have liked (no fault of Apple), the device more than delivers on the promises made and the positive reviews.

The purchase, however, got me thinking about why I (and obviously tens of millions of others) feel so compelled to emotionally purchase devices from Apple that may not be perfect (no flash, no USB port and no camera) and will usually be outdated due to upgrades in a few months.


The fact is, there are probably few logical or technical reasons to buy the iPad or even for most people to upgrade to the iPhone 4. Yet we do so, or at least I have done so with numerous versions of an iPod/iTouch and now with my iPad. Then a collegue forwarded a great 48 page presentation from Slideshare entitled, Eight Easy Steps to Beat Microsoft (and Google) by Ouriel Ohayon that outlines his take on the strategies used by Apple to continuously beat their competition. As I read this presentation, it was clear that these same strategies could be used by bank marketers and product developers as we try to build market share and emotional bonds with our customers.

The eight strategies are:

1. Believe in the simple: Rather than stopping at the initial development stage when solutions are more complex, drop the 20% of non-required functionality and perfect the other 80%
2. Design a full experience: While the store contributes minimally to profits, it adds greatly to the overall experience. The product line is very lean with vertical integration of product and channels alowing for complete central control.
3. Lock customers in: Much like Apple's iTunes, 'Keep the Change' and PNC's Virtual Wallet combine services in a way that locks the customer in which reduces churn.
4. Sell as a premium: By focusing on the customer experience, Apple charges a hefty premium on their harware. Banks can do the same by innovating and focusing on the needs of the more affluent segments.
5. Cross-sell your product line: The iCustomer puchases one product and then is converted into buying more halo products that appeal to the same senses. In fact, there is a direct correlation to iPod and iPhone sales with the sales of the Mac. By buying more, the experience is enhanced. Again, the Virtual Wallet does this seamlessly and online.
6. Balance control vs. freedom: Apple controls all elements of the products it produces and sells, yet allows enough freedom that the customer is still satisfied. Customers will consolidate their relationships and even accept some concessions if one provider offered a far superior product.
7. Think different: Instead of building products and finding the customers who will buy them, Apple starts with how the customer buys and/or uses products and then builds them. Banking could learn quite a bit from this customer first strategy.
8. Assess risk and competition: Apple doesn't respond to the market, it makes the market. Therefore, the biggest risk Apple faces is also it's strength . . . control and innovation. By innovating, they continue to control.

While there are definite differences between the emotion attached to sleek and shiny technology and financial services, Apple has found a way to differentiate itself from the competition and charge a premium for their products. In an environment where margins are being squeezed and many people believe the delivery of financial services is a commodity, those who succeed will continue to innovate and be customer focused.

How is your bank investing in product and/or channel R&D? Have you spent time innovating your checking account structure in response to Reg E?

Responding to the Self-Directed Bank Customer

According to a soon to be published Accenture survey of senior banking executives from major banks across the world, there has been a significant power shift between banks and their customers that has resulted a lowering of customer profitability levels. The research entitled, Customer 2012: Time for a New Contract Between Banks and Their Customers?, found that nearly half of the executives have seen their average customer profitability decline by 5-15 percent since the beginning of the financial crisis.

According to Noel Gordon, global managing director of Accenture's banking practice and co-author of the research, “Consumers have emerged more confident in making financial decisions for themselves, more skeptical of their bank brands, more price-conscious and more willing to move away from institutions that provide poor service.
For the banks, traditional profit-recovery strategies – rate and fee increases, conventional cross-selling and organic growth – will not readily fix the problem because broader customer expectations and service demands have risen in the wake of the financial crisis.”

The vast majority of bank executives surveyed (83 percent) reported increased demand for “direct” services – online, telephone, and mobile – since the financial crisis, and nearly two-thirds (63 percent) believe that meeting those demands will be a major challenge for their companies in the next three years. What is interesting about the research is that nearly half of the bankers also cited that customers want more personalized services.

These traditionally conflicting customer desires of alternative channel access and increased personalization can only be addressed through the collection and application of enhanced customer insight including data from third parties, payment behavior, channel use tracking, customer preferences and survey data integrated across all lines of business and available to front-line employees. This insight needs to drive more sophisticated segmentation and intelligent interactions with the goal to 'pull customers' as opposed to 'pushing product'.

Accenture believes there are six strategies banks can use to foster stronger relationships:

• Identify and understand customer behaviors and trends to continually evolve marketing and distribution strategy.
• Provide interactive, targeted customer service while decreasing costs.
• Leverage IT to provide personalized interactions.
• Apply retailization tactics to foster experience-based loyalty.
• Use transformative efficiency to reduce unit cost for customers, partners and suppliers.
• Support the rapid evolution of business and operating models.

With decreased loyalty, increased price sensitivity and online capabilities that make switching financial providers easier than ever, only banks that can fully leverage customer data and enhanced analytics to deliver needs-based solutions will be in a position to reverse recent customer profitability declines.

How is your bank positioning itself to respond to the self-directed customer? What strategies are you using to capture and use transactional, behavioral and social insights? Are your marketing communication strategies changing? I would love to hear from you.

Bank 2.0 is a Bank Marketer Must Read

There are not many books (or anything else for that matter) that I find compelling enough to pre-order. Sure, there may have been a Cleveland Indians or Cavaliers championship jersey I jumped the gun on, but I have never stood in line for an Apple product or pre-ordered a movie to be the first on my block to own it.

I made an exception a few weeks back with the book Bank 2.0 - How Customer Behavior and Technology Will Change the Future of Financial Services by Brett King not only because I was intrigued by the title, but because I have been following Brett's Banking4Tomorrow blog for a couple months and I find his take on the changes in our industry both enlightening and spot on. King is also an international speaker and is an industry advisor on Huffington Post (Business News).

This evening, Brett King’s book Bank 2.0 begins US distribution with a NYC launch (I actually ordered one from overseas a couple weeks ago and several more for some of my colleagues and clients from a U.S. distributor). While I am definitely not done with the close to 400 page book, it is a great business read for anyone involved in marketing, channels, distribution, innovation or the product area in a financial institution.

The book begins by discussing the significant changes that have occurred and will occur in customer behavior as a result of the advent of the Internet and smart phone and the expectations associated with these channel shifts. King discusses the impact of the shift in control from the bank to the customer and the choices that have resulted and will result in the future. These changes are illustrated in his book's video presentation.

While there is a bit of an international bias in the book due to Brett's background, his observations are all valid and well documented with statistics even though the banks and consumers in the states may be a bit behind their counterparts overseas. He illustrates the three stages of consumer behavioral disruption as shown below.

Part 2 of the book is all about the channels that customers use and the ways banks will need to reconfigure these channels in the future to win. Individual chapters focus on the branches, call centers, online banking/web, mobile and even ATMs. What I found both surprising and different about this section compared to many business books is that King is not shy about providing both opinions on how to address the changes that are occurring (with facts to support his recommendations) as well as a vast number of real life examples of both the good and bad in the industry. There is definitely a continuous ROI focus on all of his thoughts based on his vast experience in the industry. 

In the third section of the book, there is a look into the future of banking. Brett digs much deeper into the customer experience and channel impact of the changes that have already taken place and what bankers can expect in the future. As can be expected, there are discussions around social networking, new technologies, the future of payments and what the banks role may be in the P2P world as well as a good analysis of the impact on bank sales, marketing and advertising.

Throughout the book, King challenges banks with regard to their response to the massive customer changes in the past decade. In fact, he has even developed an inforgraphic around the lack of true innovation banks have done and whether the innovation has been done in the areas that matter.

This book is both thought provoking and fact-based, and is definitely a must-read for any banker (or industry supplier) who wants to stay current with the massive changes in our industry and wants a glimpse as to what is right around the corner.

Bank Marketers Should Focus on Metrics That Matter

Early in my career, heading a bank marketing department, I remember the frustration of my department being viewed as a cost center as opposed to a revenue contributor. Part of the problem was that it was easy to see the marketing spend each month as part of the bank's expense reports. I also didn't have the measurement tools at my disposal to provide analysis in many cases.

Jump forward two decades and the tools for marketing measurement are plentiful, but the challenges for measurement have also increased exponentially. In many cases, however, it is not so much the ability to measure as it is that most bankers are not speaking the same language that the CEO and CFO want to hear.

At a time when legislation has dramatically impacted the bottom lines of most banks, CEOs and CFOs are interested in metrics that frame marketing investment and results in terms like revenue, profitability and growth. And more often than not, they want results in terms of incremental improvement over business as usual.

Unfortunately, even when hard numbers are provided (which isn't often enough), the perception of the credibility of the numbers still biases the go/no go decisioning for further investment in marketing initiatives.

This view of success is very well described by Pat LaPointe in his Marketing Measurement Today blog, where he illustrates the relationship between values created against resources consumed, where insights are transformed into action and where the perception of measurement quality (many times viewed as the 'so what's') provides the motivation for future action. Pat used the following equation to illustrate his point.



Instead of going through all of the measurements that should be done, what are some of the ways current metrics should be adjusted in order to become more relevant in today's banking environment and to be of higher value to the CEO, CFO and organization as a whole?

• Measure Marketing Impact Against Corporate Goals: Instead of looking at metrics like awareness, response rates, share of wallet or even sales, change the context of the results delivered to include revenues, lifetime value and net present value. These monetary measurements are much more in alignment with the numbers provided on quarterly and annual reports and can be used to generate a Return on Marketing Investment (ROMI).
• Focus on Sales Effectiveness: In a more complex sales cycle associated with an internal sales force (mortgage lending, small business, commercial, corporate, trust, investment services, etc.), marketing needs to stay engaged beyond simply the lead generation phase. In consumer and retail banking, marketing must focus on the engagement of the newly acquired customer as well as the retention of that household. Instead of just measuring leads generated or sales converted, forecast metrics should be used that provide a look into the future value of the relationship based on the customer's level of engagement and loyalty.
• Communication Touchpoint Attribution: According to Forrester Research, with so many marketing channels currently being used, last-touch methods of allocating results to channels are outdated and could lead to a suboptimal marketing mix. In my travels, channel attribution is the holy grail of marketing measurement, where results are either not tracked or results are tracked and allocated to every communication channel. Bank marketers need better tracking methods that look at the customer decision process while serving multiple channel owners who will debate over response ownership. Otherwise, management will get an incomplete (or inaccurate) view of marketing and channel effectiveness.
• Fight the Tough Battles: Be willing to fight the tough battles that come with siloed organizations. Even when money has been budgeted to support a product or service area, the results of marketing initiatives may indicate the need for discontinuation or reduction in future investment. Another battle may loom with your database or analysis team as you attempt to get timely reporting.

With every dollar spent by a bank being highly scrutinized, it is imperative that bank marketers take a leadership role as a strategic advisor to drive revenue growth and cost reduction. By doing so, marketing budgets will be less at risk and marketing departments can be viewed as a source of future revenues as opposed to being a cost center.

How are you measuring results of your programs using metrics that matter to your CEO and CFO?

How Effective Is Your Bank's Social Media Strategy

Whether it is a company asking you to visit their Facebook page and 'Like' a product or brand or a peer wanting to keep in touch on LinkedIn, people are continually being driven to social networks according to Nielsen's latest report on social media. In this first report of its kind by Nielsen, it was found that social networks and blogs reach nearly 80 percent of active U.S. Internet users, and that social media accounts for 22.5 percent of the time Americans spend online. As expected, Facebook was by far the strongest social media brand.

In addition, it was found that nearly 40% of social media users access content from their mobile phone and that Internet users over age 55 are driving the growth of social networking through their mobile devices. As a result, "there is a need for companies to engage more strategically in the social space than they do currently," according to Radha Subramanyam, senior vice president for media and advertising insights and analytics at Nielsen.

Social Media Demographics, Nielsen Q3 2011 Report on Social Media

With networking continuing to increase, and the need to connect with customers and prospects in the most efficient and effective manner possible, more banks are using social media as part of their overall communications strategy. But, while interacting with customers through social channels can be effective, measuring the effectiveness of your marketing investment is no easy task. In fact, while many of the largest banks in the U.S. and overseas are leveraging many of the primary social networks, their strategies usually involve non-financial initiatives such as sweepstakes, charitable causes, etc. 

For instance, on August 16, Citibank used the front page of the Wall Street Journal to promote its Facebook page. On the Facebook site for Citibank US, visitors were prompted to hit 'Like' to learn how to get special access to Beyonce tickets. According to Jim Bruene from NetBanker there were 36,500 likes by midnight of that day for an increase of around 2,000 fans. Today, the page registers more than 125,000 likes (see below). But what is the return on investment for this strategy?

Citibank US Facebook Page, September 13, 2011

To show how fast what is considered a success in social media changes, we only need to look back to last March when Chase used their Chase Community Giving Facebook page to serve as the foundation for a voting process to allocate $5 million in charitable donations. At the time, this program was considered the industry standard with around 2 million 'likes'. Again, however, there was not a clear linkage between the buzz and revenues.

Chase Bank Community Giving Facebook Page

American Express, on the other hand has built very direct link between their Facebook page and credit card acquisition and engagement with their 'Link. Like. Love.' program. Unlike the Chase strategy described above, the American Express strategy is not limited duration and the program is all about their card product. With 'Link. Like. Love.', followers link their AmEx card using the Facebook platform to receive merchant-funded rewards. As rewards are communicated via Facebook (as opposed to on an online bank statement), the customer can link the offer to their card and are prompted to share the offer on Facebook with others in their network for a word of mouth marketing (WOMM) impact. As of today, AmEx has over 2 million fans with over 100,000 'likes' being generated each month based on a comparison to results on July 26.

American Express 'Link. Like. Love' Facebook Page - September 13, 2011

So how do you build a social media strategy that is effective from a financial perspective? How do you know how much to invest in a strategy and whether the strategy is successful from an ROI perspective? There is a great deal of debate today around 'attribution' and the real value of efforts that may not be directly tied to sales. And until we can do a better job of tying intangible benefits such as traffic, fans, mentions and views to some traditional metric, we should continue to be challenged by the finance departments of banks to provide more accurate measurements.

As shown in the infographic below developed recently by MDG Advertising, the vast majority of current measures used by CMOs are 'intangibles,' which by their very definition should prompt caution when using besides metrics like revenue, average order volume, reduced call volume or sales. And while 72% of CMOs cited that social media helped to close business, there was no direct connection between the investment and the return. 

Finally, even though the infographic indicates which social channels were thought to have the best ROI (Facebook), the majority of respondents didn't know what the return was on their investment or did not think there was an ROI. Obviously measurement and correlation needs to improve for social media to continue to grow as a viable financial institution marketing channel.

Infographic from MDG Advertising, September 2011

As with any marketing strategy, your social media strategy should begin with a clear establishment and understanding of your social media objectives. Look at how your competitors and those outside the industry are establishing goals and make sure that your measurement criteria is fully integrated with your current analytics system. Will your social efforts be to increase sales, improve customer service, generate customer engagement/loyalty, assist with product development or simply increase awareness of your brand? 

Once your objectives are delineated, you need to determine what percentage of your marketing budget should be allocated to your efforts. Be careful. Social media is not 'free'. Not only is there a cost for the internal team that manages the program, but there are usually external agency costs as well. In addition, since most banks don't have the luxury of simply implementing a social media strategy and getting immediate traction, most programs will need to integrate traditional media to promote social media efforts (advertising costs). Finally, there are creative, placement and tracking costs that also should be considered. 

The banking industry is known for moving en masse towards the next 'shiny object'. I would suggest viewing The Financial Brand's 'Reality Check 2.0: Myths and Facts' Webinar to understand some of the 'false reads' you could be getting from industry publications. While social media should definitely be part of every bank's strategy (customers expect a social presence), be cautious of building strategies that do not have a clear metric associated. Until key performance indicators (KPI) are established and agreed upon, bank marketers would be well advised to move conservatively and focus on integrating all communication channels.

Let me know: How are you leveraging social media at your bank? How are you measuring success? I am interesting in any success stories.

Is Bank Transfer Day a Small Bank Trojan Horse?

"A Good Day to be a Credit Union" is the headline of an article from Myriam Digiovanni in the October 19 Credit Union Times discussing the upcoming November 5 "Bank Transfer Day".

REALLY??

According to numerous news articles and coverage in both mainstream and social media, community banks and credit unions across the country are rallying around the anti-bank sentiment that has germinated from the announcement of a $5 debit card fee by Bank of America on September 29 and the increase in fees by other large banks. Not only have new account openings reportedly increased at several large credit unions, but social media traffic on the official Bank Transfer Day Facebook page and on other national credit union sites such as www.ASmarterChoice.org and www.CULookup.com have also seen spikes.

But is all this attention and potential new business a fortuitous gift or a potential threat to the well being and revenues of community banks and credit unions? It may just depend on who you ask and how the financial institutions on the receiving end of the disgruntled customer exodus handle their new customers and members.

Bank Relationship Inertia is Powerful
First of all, the number of people who are complaining may be much higher than those willing to switch. "As angry as you might be, the effort of figuring out some alternative relationship, choosing one, getting set up and the risk that the new one might be no better than the old one . . . those are huge costs," states Peter Fader, a marketing professor at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in an interview with the Chicago Tribune. "Personal relationships, the accumulated points, the brand relationship, the start-up costs and the learning curve are all intangible costs, but they are very powerful," Fader goes on to say.

The power of the relationship is also reinforced in an academic study conducted by Purdue University entitled, 'Relationships and Individual's Bank Switching Behavior' where a very weak correlation was found between the propensity to switch banks and pricing. In contrast, a much higher correlation was found between the depth and tenure of relationship and the propensity to stay with a current financial institution.

Banks have worked hard to achieve engagement with their customers through the cross-selling of additional products and services such as direct deposit, online and mobile banking, online billpay and other services. At Bank of America, there is even the possibility of a linked savings account established as part of the Keep the Change savings program. This 'stickiness', in addition to the potential tangible costs of switching at some banks who may charge a fee for closing an account (especially a newly opened account where a premium or offer may have been involved) make the changing of banks daunting for many.

The Friction of the Switch Process
For those consumers who decide to switch, many will not complete the switch process either by not associating the aforementioned engagement services or by not funding the new relationship. As a personal example, while my family moved from California to Ohio over three years ago, I have not completely severed ties with my previous bank where direct deposit and automatic payments still remain. While my new banking relationship in Ohio is sufficiently funded to avoid fees, my primary checking relationship remains in California.

According to a brand new research report from Javelin Strategy and Research, 'Faulty Process Hobbles FIs in the Battle for Acquisition, Profitability and Retention', the process of opening account online is both flawed and frustrating. In a study of the top 10 banks and 5 technologically advanced smaller organizations, the likelihood of being able to successfully open and fund a new checking account is just slightly over 50%. If you are new to a financial institution, the chances of success go down even further.

With almost one quarter of new account holders opening their desired account online in 2011, the financial and relationship impact of a poor online account opening process is significant. Hampering the process at many banks is the fact that there may not be a way to open the accounts online according to the Javelin study.

The Demographics of the Disgruntled
According to an American Bankers Association study conducted in August, as many as 70% of consumers don't pay anything for their checking account today. These households either were enrolled in a Free Checking account or (more likely) held balances or related services that allowed the fees on the account to be waived. Of those households surveyed, an additional 11% paid fees of $3 or less. That leaves only 19% of U.S. households that were paying a fee of more than $3 a month for checking as of the August survey date.

So who is still paying a fee and might be the most vocal of the disgruntled? Most likely, it is those households who do not carry an adequate balance in their account(s), do not have a direct deposit or online banking relationship, or do not have a deep enough relationship to get their fees waived.

The scenario that Bank of America (and other large banks) may be actually 'firing' unprofitable, low balance relationships was well documented in Ron Shevlin's blog, 'Maybe Bank of America Has a Plan'. With the new fee being imposed, the customer has the choice to pay a fee for their debit card at Bank of America, expand their relationship at Bank of America or leave. In his post, Ron shows how Bank of America's profitability could actually increase with the diminishment of lower balance accounts and how the recipients of these relationships (smaller banks and credit unions) could be adversely impacted by the influx of new customers.


The Importance of Engagement and Onboarding
Finally, for those customers who are walking into the doors of a new bank or credit union, the importance of a robust process of new customer engagement and onboarding couldn't be more important. According to Mike Bartoo, Regional Manager at Marquis and  financial industry veteran, "Hope is not a strategy" when it comes to building new relationships. According to Mike, banks should look back to the last 6 months of account openings to determine how well they have done with getting new customers to open 'sticky' services. If success in cross-selling has been poor, attrition has been more than desired and relationships are not profitable, there is no reason to believe the new influx of accounts will perform any better. In fact, the results may be worse.

I have covered the importance of engagement, onboarding and cross-selling extensively in this blog over the past two years, illustrating that the future profitability of a relationship often will be determined by a bank's outreach during the first 6 months of the relationship. History shows that most relationships that are unprofitable after 6 months remain that way.

So, while there may or may not be a significant amount of movement of accounts between financial institutions leading up to and following Bank Transfer Day on November 5, banks should be cautious of the types of accounts they open and determine whether they are prepared to make sure these new relationships are profitable (or are relationships at all).

What is your organization's perspective on Bank Transfer Day? Does your institution stand to benefit or lose from customers leaving or coming to your offices? Or will Bank Transfer Day be a non-event in your opinion?

I would love to hear your thoughts.

Siri: My Bank 2.0 Concierge

The introduction of Siri as the star feature of the new iPhone 4S already appears to be setting the stage for a major change in the way people interact with their phones. By combining insight reminiscent of IBM super computer Watson and the voice of a willing assistant, marketers from all industries can leverage this technology to simplify the way we complete tasks with voice commands. There is no doubt that Siri's introduction represents the mainstreaming of voice recognition and natural language interface in much the same way that the introduction of the iPad mainstreamed tablet computing.

Siri represents something of a paradigm shift in how we will interact with mobile devices going forward, and there are few places where this movement from keystroke to voice command will impact business more than banking. While today's voice technology in banking does fairly well in being able to recognize basic transaction commands and process rudimentary transactions, leveraging the technology and humanized tone of Siri and similar programs will allow banks to process an endless array of interactions seamlessly from the convenience of the phone.

Much like you would use a hotel concierge to ask various local-themed questions, imagine a world where my future banking concierge based on Siri technology will be able to work on my behalf and answer questions such as:

• Where is the closest ATM where I won't have to pay a fee?
• Where is the nearest restaurant with an NFC enabled payment device?
• Please transfer $600 into my checking account from my money market account and make my mortgage payment at XYZ bank.
• When will the most recent deposits I made clear?
• Are there any merchant-funded reward offers that I am eligible for at Southfield Mall?
• Where is the closest branch with Saturday hours (assuming I would ever need to visit a branch)

What is nice is that my future banking concierge would process all of my questions with the pleasant nature of my current GPS system, listening intently and not getting frustrated if my question seems trivial or repetitive. In fact, the intelligence behind applications like Siri would get more intelligent over time and evolve based on my behavior. And instead of receiving a link, search box, application or an ad, I will receive a verbal confirmation or a direct answer.

Leading banking organizations will most likely also find a way to allow me to open a new account without ever picking up a pen, typing in personal information or meeting a new account representative face-to-face. By taking insight already available within my mobile applications and various social media sites I use, my banking concierge could easily fulfill the requirements for establishing a new account whenever I desired. This capability will obviously hasten the potential reduction of vast branch networks.

While Siri only works with the iPhone 4S, alternative voice recognition applications like Vlingo (available on Android as well as iOS devices) and Nuance (which recently acquired Swype) will definitely benefit from the re-introduction of Siri by Apple as well. In fact, last week, Boston-based Vlingo saw activations increase by 50% daily, according to GigaOm at a time when usage overall has skyrocketed.

Source: PC Magazine, October 17, 2011

The key to success of Siri and other voice applications is the natural language interface, or the ability to add context to words spoken that enable the application to figure out what the user wants to do. That requires a semantic engine and artificial intelligence that continually gets better over time. In the banking world, however, the combination of transactional processes and questions are comparatively simple. In addition, with the heightened competition for the best interface, the capabilities of these systems will continuously improve while the investment needed to leverage these capabilities will become less.

Do you think Siri and related applications will be integrated into banking by legacy financial organizations? Will the integration be fast enough to fend off the new entrants into the industry such as BankSimple and MovenBank or even current online banking providers such as Ally?

I would love to hear your opinion.

Marketers Not Aligned With Consumer Marketing Channel Preferences

Technology is rapidly changing the way consumers interact. We wake up each day to a barrage of messages coming from both traditional and new media. We check our Facebook posts and text messages at the same time we watch television, read the newspaper, listen to the radio or conduct work online. 

Marketers have long recognized the shifts in media consumption that are redefining how customers absorb information and offers. However, recent studies indicate that marketers may not be in total alignment with consumers as to how the new media is consumed and their degree of reliance on various media for making buying decisions.

A new research study by Acxiom entitled, Tug of Love: The Changing Relationship Between Consumers and Brands found that more than four in five people (82%) believed they were in control of the relationship between themselves and their brands (with 'control' being defined as receiving the information they desire, when and through the media they want). This was more than 50% higher than marketers thought, indicating that 'push' broadcast marketing is quickly being replaced with 'pull' marketing where the individual is in charge of message consumption.


Interestingly, the perception of having the ability to filter messages that were either inappropriate or not of personal interest increased with age, possibly due to less messages being sent using electronic channels and due to improved targeting available for older households. Older households also benefit from having longer relationships with their brands, resulting in less bombardment of messages occurring.

Despite feeling in control, however, one in four households still say they receive 'inappropriate' marketing communications, while marketers feel they do a better job of targeting. Even with this ability to screen messages, only 27% of consumers believed their brands understood them or communicated with them appropriately. The good news is that some of the best numbers were recorded for financial services communications, even though less than half believed they were understood and communicated with well.

One of the most surprising findings in this study and in a recently published study from the European Journal of Marketing entitled, Comparing Perceptions of Marketing Communications Channels (Vol. 45, No. 1/2, 2011, pp 6-43), was that although email is well established and widely used by marketers, the traditional channels of television, radio, newspapers and to a significantly greater degree, direct mail retain historically favored attributes of trust and reliability. Conversely, some of the newer media such as SMS and mobile received much lower rankings than marketers believed they would, making these channels less powerful or accepted by consumers of any age category. In fact, direct mail was reported by both customer and prospect groups in both studies as being in the top two marketing channels preferred next to email.

In the Acxiom study, 71% of current customers cited direct mail as an appropriate way of reaching them, with 57% of prospects preferring direct mail. These acceptance ratings were far above what marketers thought who were asked the same question. Only 35% of marketers thought prospects would welcome direct mail. They were much closer with customer perception, noting that they believed 75% would be positive about direct mail. Email acceptance was 77% for customers and only 52% for prospects, still significantly higher than other newer media. In fact, only 12% of consumers felt mobile advertising was appropriate, with the figure for SMS being only 9%. As could be surmised, marketers believed the acceptance rate on these media options would be much higher. Despite the industry focus on and massive growth of interactions through social media, only 4% of consumers wanted to be reached using these channels.

Customer Acceptance of Alternative Marketing Channels (Acxiom, 2011)

Prospect Acceptance of Alternative Marketing Channels (Acxiom, 2011)

The European Journal of Marketing study dug deeper into the perceived attributes of the different media channels as determined by both the sender and recipient. As could be expected, channels that were considered annoying or irritating included SMS, phone, door-to-door and email. Consumers found direct mail to have the qualities of being informative, reliable and trustworthy, while they found most mass marketing to be informative and enjoyable.

Perceptual Mapping of Marketing Channel Attributes - Recipient (European Journal of Marketing, 2011)

'Senders' as defined by the study had a pretty close correlation with recipients regarding most marketing channels except they viewed email in a significantly more favorable light than consumers. Part of this bias may be caused by the lack of measurement between the stages of clicks and consumption of the email opened. The chart below illustrates the perception of the senders of marketing messages on the same dimensions as the above graph.

Perceptual Mapping of Marketing Channel Attributes - Sender (European Journal of Marketing, 2011)

Regression analysis found, not surprisingly, that a marketing offer is more likely to be successful if the recipient regards the information as important. In addition, higher involvement with the product or service is also more likely to result in greater engagement. Finally, it was found that receivers are more likely to be persuaded by the marketing offer in a particular channel if they find communications in that channel to be enjoyable and entertaining, and if the channel that has a reputation for reliable information. Again, this illustrates why some traditional channels such as direct mail and, to a lesser degree, email continue to perform well.

While the Acxiom study was conducted in Europe and the European Journal of Marketing Study was conducted in Australia may impact the specific numbers, but most likely dramatically change the trends found. Both of these studies and a recent white paper published by The Winterberry Group entitled, The Multichannel Revolution: New Media, New Approaches, New Opportunities also emphasized that no single channel strategy will be enough in today's multichannel world. Instead, marketers need to develop a long‐term, audience‐driven multichannel strategy, gaining insight into customer attributes, demand drivers and response cues that are the key to optimal budget allocation.


Finding that right balance of media (and having the courage to respond quickly to its changing dynamics) will
prove essential to growth in tomorrow’s competitive marketplace.

I would like to hear from you. How is your bank's media mix changing as you plan for 2012 to reflect changing media consumption patterns, shrinking budgets and greater emphasis on ROI?

Consumers Are Increasingly Using Multiple Devices to Support Banking Needs

Traditional bricks and mortar facilities are being visited less as the use and importance of online and mobile devices continues to increase according to Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey released yesterday. According to the survey, while a large percentage of consumers still manage their finances offline (45%), the percentage of consumers using online services from their financial institution has continued to increase annually; increasing 11% since 2009 to 38% in 2011.

The main reason consumers said that they don't visit their bank branch as often as they used to is because they are visiting their FI's website and use their online banking tools (76%). These online banking tools are so important that one-third (33%) said they would switch their relationship to another institution if there were better online tools offered elsewhere.

Source: Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey

The importance of online tools was reinforced by Brett King, author of the bestseller Bank 2.0 and founder of direct mobile banking start-up Movenbank at this year's BAI Retail Delivery Conference in Chicago. "Banking is quickly changing from a place you go to something you do everyday," stated King. He provided a chart from the American Bankers Association and Nielsen Research that illustrated the channel migration occurring today and projected in the future.

Source: ABA, Nielsen Research

It appears that the growth of mobile banking is only limited by the growth of ownership of a smartphone according to the Intuit study. Forty-one percent of all respondents indicated ownership of a smartphone, 23% said they used a mobile banking solution, and an additional 17% intend to try mobile banking in 2012. The primary reason consumers indicated that they do not use mobile banking was because they do not own a smartphone (25%) followed by the fact that they prefer to bank online (22%).

Source: Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey

These findings are similar to the findings last week from comScore that drew a correlation between mobile banking and smartphone adoption. "The investments in mobile made by financial service institutions, along with the continued growth in smartphone adoption, have had a positive effect on the use of mobile financial services," states Sarah Lenart comScore vice president for marketing solutions.

As expected, the adoption rate of mobile banking is demographically skewed. Young adults (aged 18-32) are three times more likely to carry their bank in their pocket, compared to Gen X, baby boomers or seniors. And while 65% of mobile banking users access their accounts through the internet/Web, 28% use a mobile application. "Regardless of age, each customer expects to connect to their financial institution in their own way," said CeCe Morken, president and general manager of Intuit Financial Services.

In another Intuit study of more than 50,000 mobile banking customers, it was found that consumers tend to interact with their financial institution 45% more often if they use a combination of both mobile and online tools. These customer also tended to have larger relationships and a better retention rate.

"While we anticipate that there will be some mobile-only consumers, most people will be using multiple devices on any given day in the future," said Intuit spokesperson Tobin Lee in a conversation yesterday. "Financial institutions must be prepared to deliver financial information and insights across multiple devices (PC, phone, tablet), optimized to the merits of each device it they are going to meet customer's needs. If they don't, someone else will . . . probably displacing a bank's relationship."

The desire for 'anywhere app access' is also supported by a just released study from Oracle entitled, Opportunity Calling: The Future of Mobile Communications - Part Two which found that while there was a stronger preference to use a tablet for mobile banking (34%) compared to a mobile phone (11%), the majority of consumers (55%) would prefer to use both devices. This is important to prepare for since the same study found that almost 30% of the U.S. mobile customers that do not already have a tablet device plan to purchase one in the next 12 months. These findings were also reinforced in last April's, Intuit 2020 Report: The Future of Financial Services.

As customers continue to use multiple channels to connect with their bank, it will be increasingly important to have a 360-degree view of customer device touch points and to leverage the advantages of each device to provide an optimum customer experience. The current anxiety over online and mobile security needs to be addressed at the same time as innovations such as near field communication (NFC) and location based services get integrated into online and mobile solutions. Bankers will need to get ahead of the payments innovation curve and prepare for major distribution channel disruption. In short, banks will need to do a paradigm shift by becoming nimble at a time of increased regulation and consumer scrutiny.

Are today's banks prepared for the massive changes ahead? Or will new online organizations such as Ally, BankSimple, Movenbank and others steal the hearts and wallets of Gen Y and device savvy consumers?

I would love to hear from you.

Banking Industry Leaders Discuss Findings of Intuit Financial Management Survey

In conjunction with the release of Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey, Banking.com hosted a Twitter Town Hall yesterday, bringing together financial industry leaders to discuss loyalty and channel migration as well as some of the challenges and opportunities facing the banking industry. The following is a recap of the very robust one hour dialogue. (the complete transcript can be found using #IFSsurvey on Twitter)

The Town Hall discussion began around the issue of customer loyalty and the finding that many consumers thought their financial provider was not 'in touch' with their needs. Given the events of the past week, where many large banks reversed decisions around the implementation of fees due to highly vocal negative sentiment amplified by social media and credit union trade group support, most participants believed that banks are not leveraging current insight and technology to make better decisions and provide value added service. 

Tobin Lee (@Tobin_Lee), Intuit Financial Services spokesperson stated, "It is time for a banker mindset shift; cultivating deeper relationships, more meaningful engagement and stronger advocacy for growth". Campbell Edlund from EMI (@EMI_mktg4sales) added, "These findings provide a very strong argument for a communications plan around the customer lifecycle". 

The already robust dialogue really took off as the discussion moved to the acceptance and utilization of banking channels (especially mobile and tablet banking). Bradley Leimer (@leimer) from Mechanics Bank in the San Francisco Bay area believed mobile strategy will be the key to future engagement due to the portability and 'always on' nature of the device. He also believed that the correlation between mobile banking and smartphone use (41% of respondents owned a smartphone) could indicate a lower engagement with financial technology in general for non-smartphone users.

Edlund added that while there is currently a higher penetration of smartphones than tablets, tablets can not be ignored by banks since Oracle found that tablet ownership is expected to increase significantly in the next year. She also warned that we need to be cautious not to get ahead of the acceptance curve. . . "we always underestimate inertia". Brett King (@brettking), author of Bank 2.0 and founder of Movenbank went a step further stating that within 3 years all bank websites will need to be built for tablets first. He also believed that branches will continue to diminish in presence and utility (according to the study, 27% of respondents still visit their branch once a month in addition to ATM visits).

Mark Zmarzly (@BankMarketing) did not believe bricks and mortar would completely go away, but definitely felt the relevance of branches will change. "It's easy to say branches will go away, but is that realistic? They have to evolve, but customers will never let them become 100% irrelevant." King responded that with the drop in branch transactions, the economics of the branch are not working. I (@jimmarous) illustrated the model of Boeing Employees Credit Union in Seattle, where only 2 of the 40 branch network have tellers, while the installation of multiple ATMs at offices and around the city have an average of 10,000+ transactions each. 94% of the transactions at BECU are done electronically, according to Howie Wu (@howie_wu) from the credit union.

"Relevance is the key to banking for tomorrow," stated King. "By 2015, mobile will be the #1 day-to-day channel, OLB #2 with the branch network being #5. The challenge for mobile and online will be developing great customer journeys". King doesn't believe these journeys exist today and believes the goal should be to have banking so pervasive that it is not tied to a branch, device or website, but is everywhere customers are.

Edlund pointed to the retail industry as a forerunner for what we will see in financial services. "Social and tablets will change the landscape in banking as they have in retailing", Edlund stated. (During the Twitter Town Hall, there was even a discussion of the integration of TV as a channel for banking). Representatives from EMI in Boston (EMI_mktg4banks) emphasized that we will continue to see a blurring of all channels with social media providing some of the glue for enhanced communication. Gamification and location-based rewards were also seen as a key elements of engagement by Leimer and Edlund.

A conundrum was discussed with regard to the needs of small businesses where checks still prevail and the need for branches. King believed that we will see significant attention paid to mobile payments for businesses in the next couple years, while I added that tablet apps for business are also being developed to respond to the needs of the business community. NFC was also seen as a game changer with regard to the need for branches for small businesses. Bob Williams (bob_williams) from Harland Clarke believed that, while check usage is definitely dropping, there are much greater efficiencies today than in the past with RDC and other electronic tools.

It was clear from the Intuit research that was just released, the Bank 2020 research released in April, and the discussion during the Twitter Town Hall today that there is significant disruption in the banking industry with regards to channel support and device utilization. The consumer movement to new banking channels is mirroring the movement to more sophisticated devices such as smartphones and tablets. Many consumers are NOT choosing one device or channel over another, but are using multiple devices depending on their personal needs.

Consumer desire for an integrated banking experience without friction will need to be supported by banking organizations in the future. Distribution networks (whether tangible or intangible) will need to support an expanding array of capabilities that may include integration within retail or social sites as opposed to standing alone.

As I stated to the participants of the Twitter Town Hall at the end of today's discussion, "If banks are not prepared for the channel migration that is already underway, they may experience the impact of 'Bank Transfer Decade'".

Note: A summary of the findings of Intuit Financial Services' 4th Annual Financial Management Survey and recently released related research is available in my previous Bank Marketing Strategy blog post.

If you weren't able to join us, what are your thoughts around the impact of channel shift away from the branches and towards other media? Will we see the elimination of branches completely? Will another device or technology unseat smartphones and tablets?

I would love to hear from you.