Zions Bank Continues to Improve Onboarding Process by Expanding Channels and Touches

Instead of simply sending a single letter to new account openers to thank them for their business, Zions Bank has expanded their onboarding program to include a 30 day 'engagement' mailing and a 60 day 'cross-sell' mailing. In addition, they utilize their centralized call center for follow-up and reach all new customers with email to reinforce the written communication. This integrated focus towards new customer communication has resulted in a significant reduction in new customer attrition and enhanced cross-sales of services.

Credit Card DM Volume Finally Rises

For the first time in three years, credit card-related direct mail volume increased during last year's fourth quarter according to research recently released from Mintel Corporation.

According to the research, while the volume of credit card direct mail in 2009 (less than 2 billion pieces) was 66% less than in 2008 and far less than the annual level of 7 billion a year experienced from 2004-2007, there was an increase of 47% during the fourth quarter of last year, compared to the previous quarter. Contributing to this increase, Chase increased their credit card mailings by the largest amount – 87% over the same period in 2008. In addition, US Bank's credit card mailings were up 64% over the same period of time, according to the study.


Unlike in the past, more than a third of credit card offers sent in 2009 included an annual fee (compared to one-fifth in 2008). While most banks are still working hard to assist customers with credit challenges in the mortgage and home equity areas, this trend in credit card mailings could be reflective of a view by some banks that the economic recovery could be beginning.

Capital One Continues to Innovate

Historically an aggressive marketer and innovator in the credit card industry, Captital One has expanded its reach in recent years, using their growing banking franchise as the foundation for introducing innovative banking products. In addition to having a relatively rich debit rewards program and expanding into online and small business banking, they have recently introduced a new savings product called "InterestPlus Online Savings".

The saving program offers an above market interest rate on balances over $2,500 in addition to a 10% quarterly interest bonus payment paid if the customer uses their Capital One credit card once a month.
The bonus can also be earned if the customer maintains a minimum balance of $15,000 each month. The bonus for using the credit card is similar to other promotions done by Captial One in the past 12-18 months to cross-sell services and relationships off their credit card foundation.

The promotion of the new service began in December of last year through the bank's web site, statement inserts, direct mail and with email according to Comperemedia. Using strong visual elements such as comparative bar graphs and icon buttons similar to what I have seen with ING mailings, it is clear that Capital One plans to leverage their strong marketing talents from the credit card industry in building a strong bank brand.

Targeting New Movers for Enhanced Growth

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the national mover rate declined from 13.2% in 2007 to 11.9% in 2008 - the lowest rate of moves on record. Still, over 30 million people changed residences during this one year period, representing a powerful opportunity for new customer growth. In fact, even though the demographics of movers has skewed younger, with a higher percentage of renters moving, this segment continues to outperform all other prospect universes from a new customer acquisition perspective.

While many of my clients continue to focus on checking offers for the new mover segment, more banks are realizing the benefits of promoting products such as money market accounts and even equity credit and investment services.
This is because people tend to more thoroughly evaluate their financial position during the three months surrounding their move, with more than 50% changing and/or opening new financial relationships during this period. It is believed that the process of portfolio evaluation has even increased over the past 18-24 months as the mortgage process has become more stringent.

The keys to reaching this transitional segment include; 1) being first in the mailbox of the new mover after their move when there is less competing clutter, 2) building a system for efficient and ongoing processing of new names and delivery of offers, and 3) measuring the impact of your new movers program and testing offers and timing.

Historically, many retailers such as Bed, Bath and Beyond, Pottery Barn, and local welcome wagon programs filled mailboxes with postcard format offers immediately after a household's move. Recently, however, many of these same retailers are opting to send much larger catalogue style communications 1-3 weeks after a move is completed. I also have seen some financial firms improve their ROI by using Standard Class mail as opposed to First Class since the difference in delivery dates by the post office has narrowed significantly over the past few years while the difference in cost has skyrocketed.

If a new movers program is not part of your neighborhood marketing process, you are leaving money on the table and losing out on a great opportunity for account and relationship growth. As the mover rate begins to rebound over time, a strategy for reaching this transitional segment will pay off.

Segment Your Customer Base For Reg E Communications

The recent changes to Reg. E, impacting how financial institutions can levy fees for overdrafts caused by one time debit card or ATM transaction, have created a period of both challenge and opportunity for financial institutions. Due to the almost certain negative impact on a bank’s fee revenue and potential customer confusion about this new regulation, it is important to be able to effectively and efficiently implement these new requirements, maximizing account holder opt-in responses while providing a positive customer experience.

In this month's ABA Bank Marketing Magazine, Robert Giltner from Velocity Solutions suggests that financial institutions should start their communications process with a mass mail and email campaign to all customers explaining the new regulation. While I agree that all customers should be provided a clear understanding of their options, I don't agree that an all encompassing direct mailing should be done from a cost perspective.

Every customer should not be treated the same. Research shows that while most customers do not like the fees associated with overdrafts, there is a percentage that rely on overdraft coverage to meet current expenses or avoid embarrassment caused by inadequate record-keeping. To achieve the highest possible opt-in response at the lowest possible cost, I believe a segmented and integrated communications process should be used, leveraging multiple communication and response channels and focusing resources where they will have the greatest impact.

Instead of treating all account holders the same, most financial institutions I have talked to will be communicating most aggressively to the 10-15% of the customers who have the highest incidence of overdrafts, connecting with those households that the FDIC found to be the highest users (and fee generators) in their 2008 Study of Bank Overdraft Programs.

Some firms are even trying to determine which owner on an account is responsible for the majority of the overdrafts. By using all available communication channels (direct mail, statement inserts, email, POS, phone, and branch level communication), banks are hoping to communicate the benefits of opting-in to the customer, thereby minimizing the fee income impact of the regulation while improving the customer experience. The majority of the customers who do not overdraft their accounts will be more efficiently reached using a series of statement inserts, statement messages, branch level POS, ATM messaging, email, etc as opposed to postal mail.

I believe the most difficult challenge may be after the regulation takes effect in August, when customers who were not frequent overdrafters experience their first rejected ATM transaction or debit card purchase.

BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum Recap

I just finished presenting at the second BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum in Chicago where close to 50 financial institutions learned about legislative changes, customer perceptions, new product development and marketing opportunities around the checking account. While only a month has passed since the first Checking 2.0 Executive Forum held in Atlanta, it is obvious that there are a number of changes occurring in the marketplace.

There was consensus among the participants that while consumer trust and confidence in banks has been negatively impacted by the events of the past two years, there may be some uptick in these measures over the next few months if financial results continue to improve and if banks continue to focus on the customer experience.


A significant change from the March event was that virtually all of the participating banks have developed an alternative version of 'Free Checking'. Checking account product innovation has added stipulations to some accounts, benefits for a fee on others and alternative reward structures on other checking programs. In fact, in a quick survey of the participating banks, it did not appear that any of the 'Free Checking' programs were similar.

When discussions moved to how banks are responding to Reg E, there were some organizations that were well on their way towards communicating with their customer base while other banks had not yet begun their information dissemination. Surprisingly, MB Financial out of Chicago shared that they had already achieved close to 85% opt-in from their customer base (and nearly 100% from new customers) by leveraging a combination of postcards, traditional direct mail, phone call follow-up and branch level involvement.

The success of some of the participating banks illustrated the importance of a multi-channel communication process with strong employee involvement and call center follow-up.

Be Careful of 'Mental Opt-Out' With Email Marketing

For those who read my Blog, you know that I feel strongly that the email channel is significantly underutilized by the banking industry. Not only do marketers not effectively leverage this channel in conjunction with other direct and mass marketing options, most banks do a terrible job at even collecting email addresses in the first place.

Unfortunately, for those who have begun to use email marketing in support of customer communication efforts, some have gone to the opposite extreme by viewing email as a 'free' marketing tool without giving adequate thought to the importance of relevancy. As many realize in their daily scanning of their email in box, overusing the email channel can have a detrimental effect of the value of this channel and negatively impacting the overall customer experience.


It was with great interest therefore that I read a recent op-ed in DM News written by Mark Smith from Portrait Software discussing the mental opt-out that occurs when a company bombards a customer with too much untargeted email marketing communication, only to have the reader open the email and then quickly hit the "delete' key. The impact of multiple irrelevant emails is to either explicitly receive an opt-out to future email or to implicitly lose the intended reader's trust and attention for future communication that may have been of interest.

As Mark mentions in his op-ed, if you get a reputation for sending irrelevant communications, you are basically asking for mental opt-out. And just because a customer's name doesn't appear on the do-not-contact list, it doesn't mean they are paying attention.

As financial institutions get more comfortable with this channel, it will be important to ensure that adequate targeting is done and that the focus of each email is to positively impact lifetime customer value.

Comparing Results to Industry Norms

I am frequently asked about what response rate a client should expect based on 'industry standards' or results from similar programs at other financial institutions. While the DMA does compile statistics and reports on direct marketing response rates with their Response Rate Trends Report, and there are other tools available from alternative sources such as MarketingSherpa, there are significant flaws to using general standards or even the results from another bank's program as a guide for setting expectations.

It is difficult to find comparable benchmark results since you will need to find programs with the same or similar:

• Target audience
• Product features and benefits
• Offer
• Channel mix (were there other marketing channels used to support the program)
• Timing (not only to reflect seasonality, but overall environment conditions at the time of the program)
• Brand strength
• Competition

After more than 30 years of marketing services experience within the banking industry, I have found that the best benchmark against which you can measure the success of a current or future campaign is the results from previous programs at your financial institution. While the timing of the previous program may be different, far more of the variables described above stay the same. Sometimes developing this benchmark may require analyzing a program that had not been previously measured, but this guidepost will be far more accurate than an industry or competitor result.

Reg E Opt In Results Better Than Expected

As I travel across the country and talk to bankers about their early Reg E opt-in results, many are experiencing significantly higher than expected acceptance rates. In fact, some banks have indicated that they have achieved opt-in rates of as high as 85% or more from the highest impacted segments (those who have the highest use of overdraft coverage) and more than 95% from new customers who are opening a new account.

This level of acceptance should provide some comfort to financial institutions who have been concerned about a massive outflow of fee income as a result of Reg E beginning on August 15. Alternatively, this level of opt in sets the bar rather high for those organizations who have either not begun their Reg E communication or had thrown in the towel expecting customers to opt out on a massive basis.


In talking to those bankers who have achieved best-in-class results, here are the consistent strategies for success:

• Connect with customers using as many channels as possible - While response to statement inserts, direct mail and ATMs has not been as strong as the outbound telephone, 1:1 branch contact and email channel, the most successful banks have used all channels to provide a clear understanding of the regulation and to generate response.
• Use all outbound phone capabilities available - When a direct connection is made with a customer discussing the option of 'keeping their coverage the same' and 'having the assurance of no surprises', success rates have approached 90+%. Banks are using all of the resources possible to make these calls, including branch call nights, outsourced providers and leveraging inbound call resources.
• Expand communication beyond high opportunity segments - Instead of only connecting with high OD households, the most successful organizations are reaching out to all of their customers regarding opting in. While not having the same immediate financial impact, this communication emphasis will avoid potential negative customer experiences in the future.

As a result of the strong results achieved to date by those banks who started early, most of the financial institutions I have talked to have communication strategies that extend well beyond August 15. While the regulation takes effect on that date, most banks are going to continue mailing and call efforts until they have reached as many households as possible. Obviously, knowing that an 80+% acceptance rate is possible provides the financial incentive to not approach this effort casually.

Effective Onboarding Begins with Good Insight

In 2003, the BAI released a research study entitled, 'The Ninety Day Window of Opportunity', where interviews, deposit statistics and segmentation models revealed that nearly 75% of all cross-sell opportunities and the vast majority of attrition occurred in the first 90 days of a new customer relationship. These findings continue to be verified in the marketplace, with expanded concern recently around the lack of funding, engagement and use of new products by these new customers.

More than ever, financial institutions need to begin the onboarding process by capturing an accurate and robust view of the customer which can be used across the organization to enhance the customer experience and expand the relationship with the bank. In short, to optimize the customer experience during the first critical months and year of the relationship from both the customer's and bank's perspective, you need a 360 degree view of the customer. With online account openings, this process becomes even more critical.


Unfortunately, with so many data entry points and so much emphasis on operation efficiency and regulatory requirements, the capture of many key elements of customer insight gets overlooked or is done inconsistently by the front line. Beyond address, birth date, gender and identification information, financial institutions need to begin to collect insight such as email addresses, primary decision maker on the account (it is often the female in the household even though we usually address correspondences to the male), the preferred channel of communication (which is often email), the reason for coming to the bank (move, dissatisfaction, previously unbanked) and what services they use elsewhere (the holy grail of insight). Of course, with more and more of the collection process occurring online, organizations are under increased pressure to validate this insight (especially the address).

With this insight, you are in a much better position to communicate with the new customer in a personalized and relevant manner, using the right channels to the best person in the household offering a service or solution that is geared to their needs. These communications should begin on day one and continue throughout the early stages of the customer relationship enhancing the customer experience and increasing loyalty and retention. Multiple channels should be utilized to improve effectiveness and measurement of all touches should occur to gauge the ROI of the process.

Optimism and Better Results Reported in Recent DMA Quarterly Business Review

In the most recent DMA/Winterberry Group Quarterly Business Review (QBR) for the first quarter of 2010, the Direct Marketing Association in conjunction with The Winterberry Group found that both direct and digital marketers have seen improved performance in terms of revenue, marketing expenditures and profitability compared to the previous quarter and the same quarter last year. Moreover, both marketers and service providers have optimism that this growth will continue, albeit at a slow pace.


Even though the plurality of 301 marketers surveyed said their spending remained the same during the period, nearly half expected spending to increase in the second quarter. The primary reason for this increased activity was cited as improved analytics and enhanced processes. In addition, there was a significant increase in revenues generated through direct channels due to slow improvements in response rates suggesting some easing of the recessionary pressures over the past year.

According to marketers, nearly all direct/digital marketing channels (with the exception of catalogs) had increased spending during the quarter. As has been the case in previous quarters, the most significant growth has been seen in email, social, search, online and mobile.channels. Interestingly, teleservices saw an increased investment after several quarters of decreases. Finally, the report found that the balance between budget allocated to acquisition and customer retention remained relatively constant at 59.5%/40.5%.

From this quarterly study, it is clear to see that online/offline integration will continue to be a marketing priority leveraging the technology available to drive better results across multiple channels and multiple touches. Reduced budgets and staffing is also making the importance of robust reporting and a strong ROI a centerpiece of most direct/digital programs.

Onboarding Communication - How Much is Too Much

As I discuss multichannel new customer onboarding program development with financial organizations, it doesn't take long before the client asks about how much communication is too much early in a new relationship.

Interestingly, according to our research at Harland Clarke as well as research from J.D. Power, the number of new products sold and the customer satisfaction ratings both increase as the number of contacts increase during the first 90 days. In fact, according to J.D. Power, the average number of accounts sold increases from less than 2.5 to more than 3 if the customer is communicated with 4-7 times or more. In addition, the satisfaction ratings increase by more than 10% if more connections are made with the customer who opened up a new account.


Unfortunately, there are still several institutions who do not have a robust communications sequence with customers who open a new account, which impacts new customer engagement, cross-sell potential, customer satisfaction and even retention. For those banks that effectively reach out multiple times using email, phone, and direct mail, the results are consistently better across the board.

One of the strongest onboarding programs I am aware of is at a regional bank in the west. Their robust onboarding process proactively takes control of the customer experience for the entire first 90 days, stressing engagement and by offering products and services that are best matched to the customer's needs. The process begins at the new account desk, where there is a selling mentality but also an emphasis on collecting key information that will assist in future communication with the customer. Email addresses are collected from as many as 85% of customers opening new accounts, which is significantly above industry averages and which allows the bank the leverage for multi-channel communication throughout the entire customer lifecycle.

An initial email that is delivered in the first two days of the new relationship discussing what the customer can expect from their bank in the upcoming months are to provide key contact information if there is a problem. This is followed by a branch personalized Thank You letter with a series of engagement service offers. Subsequent communication (beyond standard debit card mailings, etc.) include a welcome call on day 15, an engagement reinforcement letter and email on day 30, and a cross-sell direct mail and email communication based on next most likely product modeling on the 60th day of the relationship.

The bank has found that the ability to offer integrated, multi-channel communication is critical in their quest to achieve the best engagement and sales results and to reach the highest levels of customer satisfaction. Delivering early, relevant and persistent communication has help them improve retention by more than 5%, significantly increase engagement levels and improve both cross-selling and balance build efforts compared to their control group. They achieve these results by 'touching' the new account opener 6-8 times during the first 60 days and by using personalized jump pages to enhance the experience.

While the planning and development for this program was definitely more extensive than a single touch welcome program, the return on investment using all metrics validated the effort.

How many contacts does your bank use to onboard new customers? What channels do you use to reach and engage the customer?

Ten Bank Marketer Resolutions for 2011

It is the dawning of a new year in banking with many of the same challenges that we saw in 2010. Our industry continues to be viewed in a less than positive light from both the consumer and small business marketplace. 

The need for new customer growth and share of wallet expansion underpins the need for new sources of non-interest fee income at a time when regulations are dramatically reducing many traditional sources of revenue. In addition, the expansion of transaction and communication channels are changing the ways we interact with customers. 

These challenges are combined with an historically low interest rate environment and a credit environment where there is a massive amount of money to lend at a time when borrowing is more difficult and less desirable for many.

According to a national survey, the majority of personal resolutions in 2011 will revolve around saving money, losing weight, changing a bad habit and being closer to loved ones. Achieving any of these goals will take commitment, focus and changes in behavior. The same can be said for the resolutions I have developed from traveling the country over the past few months and being involved in a number of banks' annual planning efforts.

Here are areas where bank marketers believe they should focus in 2011:

1. Replace Lost Fee Income
Nothing has impacted banking over the past 12-18 months or will impact banking in 2011 more than the loss of fee income caused by the combination of the Card Act, Reg. E, and the upcoming changes from the Durbin Amendment. Almost all other resolutions for the upcoming year are built to address this need. The role of bank marketers in achieving fee income replacement goals will include checking product restructuring and new fee-based product development, increasing card transactions, improving customer engagement and better resource allocation for results.

2. Improve the Customer Experience
Another overarching resolution similar to the personal resolution of being closer to loved ones, bank marketers need to view all of their initiatives using the lens of understanding customer's needs, looking out for customers and rewarding their relationship. In an environment of heightened scrutiny of how we are treating customers, it will be more important than ever to market to consumers and small businesses on a more personalized basis from the day they open their first account and to build a reward structure that reinforces our commitment to relationship retention and growth.

3. Focus on Incremental New Customer Growth
A new balance between quantity and quality of new accounts needs to be struck. With the elimination of Free Checking occurring at most banks I visit, new acquisition models need to be developed that take into account the new checking account continuum. Instead of generating as many accounts as possible, banks will be focusing on the potential value of relationships including the likelihood of engagement and retention. A premium will be paid for those households that will immediately contribute to the bottom line.

4. Gather Email Addresses
When presenting at the BAI Retail Delivery Conference this Fall, it amazed me that there were more banks that collected cell phone numbers than collected email addresses at the new account desk. I suppose this phenomenon may be caused by the combination of more households using a cell phone as opposed to a land line for home communication and the relative ease of having a bank's IT team build another phone field into the new account process as opposed to an email field. But with other communication channel cost increasing and the improved results achieved when email is combined with more traditional channels, the importance of collecting (and using) email addresses has never been more important. Some banks are even considering stand alone marketing initiatives to address this need in 2011.

5. Reduce Customer Attrition
At a time when the cost of acquiring a new customer exceeds $200 and the annual income potential from a new relationship is at least as high, banks can ill afford to accept first year attrition rates of 30-40%. Multichannel onboarding programs that encourage alternative channel use, enhanced services (such as online bill pay, automatic savings, privacy products, etc.) and increased transactions need to be leveraged to stop the massive outflow of accounts that occur early in the customer's lifecycle. Improved tracking of relationship diminishment and win-back programs will also be used to achieve this resolution.

6. Expand Share of Wallet Through Lifestage Marketing
To compensate for the increased difficulty of generating high value relationships, there needs to be a much greater focus on organic growth, including behavior based cross-selling and lifestage marketing. While the movement from product centricity to being customer-centric has been discussed for decades, the removal of product silos is no longer an option for those banks who are seeking optimal resource allocation. More banks than ever are investing in improved models and strategies for relationship growth which will improve both engagement levels and retention in the long term. New service introductions such as privacy protection and enhanced personal financial management (PFM) tools will further allow for relationship deepening in 2011.

7. Don't Confuse Channel Economy with Channel Efficiency
No communication channel is 'free'. While email may seem like a far less costly channel to use for reaching customers, the lack of clear targeting and message development may prove costly as customers opt-out of future communications or simply ignore email messages. In my experience within the banking industry, email has not proven to be as good of a replacement for channels like direct mail as it has been a good supplement for improved results. In 2011, banks will develop much better processes for measuring the incremental impact of alternative channel communication and will continue to expand communication channels to include mobile, ATMs, social media, etc.

8. Leverage Social Media Personally and Professionally
Social media channels definitely can be beneficial or a distraction. Not many of us have time for reading about someone else's dinner plans or personal political opinions on Twitter, yet Twitter can be a great source of timely financial industry or marketing insight and competitive research delivered in a very compact format to the desktop for consumption at a time and place desired. Banks have also realized that social channels need to be used differently in financial services than with retail or other industry verticals. As opposed to trying to find 'friends' of our brands, social media has been used most effectively for customer service (Twitter) and for the promotion of broad based public relations initiatives (Chase's very popular Community Giving Campaign). The coming year will be a year of expanded testing of these new channels for the banking industry. Unlike the past, however, investment in these channels will need to generate a tangible ROI.

9. Deliver On The Mobile Banking Promise
The opportunity to be a 'first mover' in the mobile banking marketplace is quickly closing as more and more financial organizations are introducing products that work on multiple platforms. Bank of America has found that their market leading mobile banking customer base has significantly less attrition than a customer without a mobile banking application. USAA has continued to push the envelope on ways to use the mobile phone for financial convenience including remote deposit capture, receiving auto insurance quotes, requesting proof of insurance cards, etc. While building a concrete business case for mobile banking may be challenging, the marketplace will eventually demand this channel for P2P payments, geolocational applications and even low cost banking alternatives. Next year will also see the first wave of iPad and Android tablet applications that go beyond minor adjustments to current phone applications and leverage the enhanced capabilities of the popular tablet hardware.

10. Reconfigure The Branch Bank Model
The most challenging resolution for 2011 may be the testing and development of new branch banking models in light of the shift in channel use by the consumer. As branches are increasingly used primarily for account openings and small business servicing, the physical and operational configuration of branch networks will need to be evaluated. But what will be the best model for the future? While Citibank introduced a refined branch model late last year similar to an Apple Store, Huntington Bank went in an opposite direction by expanding their branch network and increasing hours and days of operation. With such a significant investment in real estate and human resources to support branch operations, each bank will be testing a variety of options in the next few years with multiple configurations most likely winning based on specific market dynamics.
I am sure there are several more important resolutions that can be added to my list, but there are already more than many of us can handle. This will definitely challenge the ability to focus and to achieve meaningful results especially in an environment of continuous change. Similar to personal resolutions, however, we all need to start as soon as possible and focus our attention on those resolutions that have the greatest impact and opportunity for success.

Let me hear where you will be focusing your efforts in 2011.

Marketers Not Aligned With Consumer Marketing Channel Preferences

Technology is rapidly changing the way consumers interact. We wake up each day to a barrage of messages coming from both traditional and new media. We check our Facebook posts and text messages at the same time we watch television, read the newspaper, listen to the radio or conduct work online. 

Marketers have long recognized the shifts in media consumption that are redefining how customers absorb information and offers. However, recent studies indicate that marketers may not be in total alignment with consumers as to how the new media is consumed and their degree of reliance on various media for making buying decisions.

A new research study by Acxiom entitled, Tug of Love: The Changing Relationship Between Consumers and Brands found that more than four in five people (82%) believed they were in control of the relationship between themselves and their brands (with 'control' being defined as receiving the information they desire, when and through the media they want). This was more than 50% higher than marketers thought, indicating that 'push' broadcast marketing is quickly being replaced with 'pull' marketing where the individual is in charge of message consumption.


Interestingly, the perception of having the ability to filter messages that were either inappropriate or not of personal interest increased with age, possibly due to less messages being sent using electronic channels and due to improved targeting available for older households. Older households also benefit from having longer relationships with their brands, resulting in less bombardment of messages occurring.

Despite feeling in control, however, one in four households still say they receive 'inappropriate' marketing communications, while marketers feel they do a better job of targeting. Even with this ability to screen messages, only 27% of consumers believed their brands understood them or communicated with them appropriately. The good news is that some of the best numbers were recorded for financial services communications, even though less than half believed they were understood and communicated with well.

One of the most surprising findings in this study and in a recently published study from the European Journal of Marketing entitled, Comparing Perceptions of Marketing Communications Channels (Vol. 45, No. 1/2, 2011, pp 6-43), was that although email is well established and widely used by marketers, the traditional channels of television, radio, newspapers and to a significantly greater degree, direct mail retain historically favored attributes of trust and reliability. Conversely, some of the newer media such as SMS and mobile received much lower rankings than marketers believed they would, making these channels less powerful or accepted by consumers of any age category. In fact, direct mail was reported by both customer and prospect groups in both studies as being in the top two marketing channels preferred next to email.

In the Acxiom study, 71% of current customers cited direct mail as an appropriate way of reaching them, with 57% of prospects preferring direct mail. These acceptance ratings were far above what marketers thought who were asked the same question. Only 35% of marketers thought prospects would welcome direct mail. They were much closer with customer perception, noting that they believed 75% would be positive about direct mail. Email acceptance was 77% for customers and only 52% for prospects, still significantly higher than other newer media. In fact, only 12% of consumers felt mobile advertising was appropriate, with the figure for SMS being only 9%. As could be surmised, marketers believed the acceptance rate on these media options would be much higher. Despite the industry focus on and massive growth of interactions through social media, only 4% of consumers wanted to be reached using these channels.

Customer Acceptance of Alternative Marketing Channels (Acxiom, 2011)

Prospect Acceptance of Alternative Marketing Channels (Acxiom, 2011)

The European Journal of Marketing study dug deeper into the perceived attributes of the different media channels as determined by both the sender and recipient. As could be expected, channels that were considered annoying or irritating included SMS, phone, door-to-door and email. Consumers found direct mail to have the qualities of being informative, reliable and trustworthy, while they found most mass marketing to be informative and enjoyable.

Perceptual Mapping of Marketing Channel Attributes - Recipient (European Journal of Marketing, 2011)

'Senders' as defined by the study had a pretty close correlation with recipients regarding most marketing channels except they viewed email in a significantly more favorable light than consumers. Part of this bias may be caused by the lack of measurement between the stages of clicks and consumption of the email opened. The chart below illustrates the perception of the senders of marketing messages on the same dimensions as the above graph.

Perceptual Mapping of Marketing Channel Attributes - Sender (European Journal of Marketing, 2011)

Regression analysis found, not surprisingly, that a marketing offer is more likely to be successful if the recipient regards the information as important. In addition, higher involvement with the product or service is also more likely to result in greater engagement. Finally, it was found that receivers are more likely to be persuaded by the marketing offer in a particular channel if they find communications in that channel to be enjoyable and entertaining, and if the channel that has a reputation for reliable information. Again, this illustrates why some traditional channels such as direct mail and, to a lesser degree, email continue to perform well.

While the Acxiom study was conducted in Europe and the European Journal of Marketing Study was conducted in Australia may impact the specific numbers, but most likely dramatically change the trends found. Both of these studies and a recent white paper published by The Winterberry Group entitled, The Multichannel Revolution: New Media, New Approaches, New Opportunities also emphasized that no single channel strategy will be enough in today's multichannel world. Instead, marketers need to develop a long‐term, audience‐driven multichannel strategy, gaining insight into customer attributes, demand drivers and response cues that are the key to optimal budget allocation.


Finding that right balance of media (and having the courage to respond quickly to its changing dynamics) will
prove essential to growth in tomorrow’s competitive marketplace.

I would like to hear from you. How is your bank's media mix changing as you plan for 2012 to reflect changing media consumption patterns, shrinking budgets and greater emphasis on ROI?

Direct Mail Still Has Impact in Digital World

As more and more marketing dollars are funneled into digital and social media, and as postal rates continue to climb, direct mail marketing has been getting less and less attention. While there is definitely a case to be made for building a multichannel communication plan integrating a number of different channels to reach customers, recent research indicates that direct mail should still be part of the mix.

A study entitled, Using Neuroscience to Understand the Role of Direct Mail conducted by the research company Millward Brown found that direct mail actually leaves a deeper impression on the human brain than its digital counterpart. The research project used functional Magnetic Resonance Imagery (fMRI) brain scans to show that our brains process paper-based and digital marketing differently and that direct mail actually created a greater emotional impression than digital communications.

During the study, participants were given marketing messages on a screen and printed on a card with brain scans done to assess how the processing of messages was impacted by the medium of communication. It was determined that tangible communication (direct mail) left a deeper 'footprint' on the brain even when the physicality of the channel (sensory impact of touch) was discounted.

• Material shown on cards generated more activity within the area of the brain associated with the integration of visual and spatial information (the left and right parietal)
• This suggests that physical material is more 'real' to the brain. It has meaning and a place and is better connected to memory because it engages with spatial memory networks.

The study also found that direct mail involved more emotional processing which is important from a memory and brand association perspective.

• More processing is taking place in the right retrosplenial cortex when physical material is presented. This is involved in the processing of emotionally powerful stimuli and memory, which would suggest that the physical presentation may be generating more emotionally vivid memories
• Physical activity generates increased activity in the cerebellum, which is associated with spatial and emotional processing (as well as motor activity) and is likely to be further evidence of enhanced emotional processing.

Finally, the study found that physical materials produced more brain responses connected with internal feelings, suggesting greater 'internalization' of the ads. According to Graham Page, Executive Vice President of Consumer Neuroscience at Millward Brown, the results suggest, "The brain is more emotionally engaged and is potentially reflecting more on a response" when viewing direct mail. "Due to the fact that the brain recognizes mail as real, memories of that piece are being created. Our brains seek to understand the thing that we hold in our hands more so than a transient image on a screen." said Page.

Even understanding some of the neuro benefits of direct mail, digital communications have distinct advantages over paper such as interactivity and the ability to integrate audio and video. In addition, with continuously improving targeting tools, digital communications can more effectively target audiences based on interests, behaviors, past transactions and other characteristics that direct mail can't match.

Bottom line, this study and other studies covered in one of my previous blog posts (Marketers Not Aligned with Consumer Marketing Channel Preferences) indicates the importance of integrating multiple channels to communicate your marketing message to people who will process and react to different channels differently. More importantly, while response rates to a credit card, new customer acquisition or cross-sell campaign may seem low, direct mail can still have a positive impact on the brain from a brand perspective . . . even to those who did not respond to the direct offer. According to Graham Page, "each point of contact with the consumer gives marketers another opportunity to communicate broader brand messages."

As marketers, we need to realize the advantages and impact of different channels and realize that each channel needs to both compliment and supplement the the other channels and the campaign as a whole. We also need to consider more tactile and emotional elements of direct mail to increase the impact of the printed piece. For instance:

• Consider heavier stock, textured finishes and unique shapes and die-cuts that may increase the tangibility of the direct mail piece
• Try to build on the emotional power of direct mail with more emotional messaging
• Don't forget to build a brand message as part of your direct mail package since even those not responding will be left with an impression
• Remailing has an advantage of reinforcing the brand communication in a way that digital communication can not

Finally, we need to be careful about making assumptions as to which channel(s) may have the greatest impact on different demographic groups. For instance, while our gut may tell us that the tech-savvy millennials may only respond to social media and digital communication, studies have shown that direct mail is still important in making a purchasing decision.

The 2010 Consumer Channel Preference Study from Epsilon found that for certain categories including financial services, the preference among millennials and even Gen X participants for receiving marketing communication from offline sources such as direct mail and newspapers was 2-3 times greater than for digital communication and social media. Likewise, a 2009 survey from ExactTarget found that 75 percent of the people 25-34 had made a purchase resulting from direct mail. The rationale for these results was due to the ability to cut through the clutter and due to the way the media was consumed (at a pace and time that was convenient to the reader).

In fact, 53% of all respondents to the Epsilon study said they paid closer attention to information they received by postal mail than through email. The research also found that there was an overall strengthening in attitudes toward postal mail between 2008 and 2010 mainly due to the convenience factor (the mail can be read when and where they want and can be saved and passed on).

On additional telling finding from the study is that respondents believed they were getting significantly less mail than in the past and that they were able to spend more time with the mail received. The implication for marketers is that there may be an opportunity to get the attention and more dedicated readership using direct mail since mail volumes are lower. The opportunity may be even greater given the overload of email marketing received by many prime consumers.

So, as you make budgetary decision for 2012, how will you allocate your media funds? What channels will get less and what channels will get more funding. More importantly, how will you measure the impact of the integrated marketing programs you will be implementing?

I would love to hear about the shifts you may be considering.

As Channel Proliferation Increases, Consumers Still Prefer and Trust Direct Mail for Financial Services Communication

According to a just released consumer channel preference study from marketing services firm Epsilon entitled, The Formula for Success: Preference and Trust, 36% of consumers prefer to receive financial services communication through the mail (compared to only 8% preferring email), while 50% state that they pay more attention to direct mail than email. Interestingly, U.S. consumers actually receive an emotional boost from receiving mail, with 60% agreeing that they "enjoy checking the mailbox."

The 2011 study is the latest in a series of studies conducted by Epsilon around communication channel preferences. In the latest study, it was found that the preference for direct mail extended to the 18-34 year old demographic, highlighting the risk in making assumptions around age and channel preferences. Part of this preference bias compared to email and other channels could be caused by the level of trust associated with the channels reviewed, since 26% of U.S. consumers found direct mail to be more trustworthy than email. The least trustworthy channel continued to be social media, with the channel only being viewed as trustworthy by 6% of consumers. Consumers also found direct mail to be more 'private' than email or online channels (important for 37% of consumers).

"Consumers use and trust certain communication channels more than others," states Warren Story, VP of product marketing at ICOM. "This means that marketers need to understand which channels resonate most at various stages of the consumer purchase cycle and incorporate a cross-channel strategy that leverages data and technology to communicate on a 1:1 basis." Story also suggests starting with direct mail and layering other channels into the marketing mix for message reinforcement.

Not only do consumers seem to prefer direct mail communication, but there seems to be an increasing frustration with the amount of email received and the level of satisfaction received from receiving emails. The study showed that 75% of U.S. consumers get a lot more emails that are not opened, with 65% saying they get too many emails overall. Conversely, 43% of consumers surveyed still enjoy receiving emails from brands on new products, indicating that targeting and messaging of communication is needed to capture attention.

For financial services communication, consumers also overwhelmingly preferred personally addressed mail as opposed to 'dear occupant' mail that doesn't have the emotional pull of a personally addressed communication. (This should be tested on an ROI basis however, since I have found that the financial benefits of less personalized direct mail can work in some instances).

Even with the strength of direct mail indicated in this study, financial marketers should not exclusively use direct mail or remove email from their marketing mix. In fact, the Epsilon study showed a greatly increasing use of Facebook and mobile phones as communication channels, while showing that the most trusted channels were newspapers, company websites and television. The study also showed that there were many perceived benefits to both direct mail and email as shown below from people who preferred direct mail to email and visa versa..

In this time of communication message overload, financial marketers need to balance the use of multiple channels based on consumer preference, financial considerations, objective of the marketing program, and the results of multichannel effectiveness measurement initiatives. Bankers also need to continue efforts to improve the targeting of messages through all channels from both a financial and customer satisfaction perspective. 

And while social media did not perform well from the perspective of trust, social channels provide several benefits that should be leveraged in a multichannel communication program due to economic considerations and the expanded use and reach of social media. Mobile channel communication should also be tested as we enter the new year and are building our marketing plans.

Of greatest importance is the development and use of advanced metrics that can assist you and your team in measuring the effectiveness of channels and channel mix. As opposed to measuring only single channels independently, advanced analytics are now available that can provide a view into the consumer's media consumption patterns and the impact of different channels.

As we enter 2012, the importance of an effective and efficient marketing communications mix is important. Budgets should be shifting to digital and social channels to build a reservoir of learnings that can be leveraged in the future, but it appears that the projected demise of traditional channels such as direct mail has been overstated. 

How will your team be shifting marketing channel dollars in the new year? How will you be measuring the impact of your efforts?

I would love your comments.

Banks and Credit Union Marketers Taking Different Paths in 2012

According to a Rand Corporation research study, consumers usually select a financial institution based on convenience of branches, convenience of ATMs and bank fees. While bank users were more likely to select based on convenience, credit union users more likely chose with a desire to avoid fees. Consumers also cite personalized service when selecting a credit union.


With this as a backdrop, it is interesting to study the divergence of opinions expressed by more than 300 financial marketers from larger banks, credit unions and community banks as part of the 2012 Bank and Credit Union Marketing Survey covered on January 17 on both The Bank Marketing Strategy blog and on The Financial Brand. 


Faced with many of the same environmental challenges of increased availability of data, a proliferation of delivery options, imminent changes in how payments are processed, new marketing communication channels and consumer sentiment that has at times been polarizing, there are significant differences in how bank and credit union marketers view their roles, challenges and opportunities. There are also differences in the channels different types of organizations will use to communicate in the next 12 months.


Breakdown of Participants and Budgets

The survey was completed by slightly more than 300 financial institution marketers, with more than half the respondents being credit unions and more than 30% being non-community banks. 82% of respondents worked in a marketing capacity. As shown below, financial institutions in all asset ranges were well-represented, including organizations with over $100 billion in assets. More than 50 total responses came from financial institutions with less than $100 million in assets. 

Distribution of Respondents by Institution Type

As noted in the initial analysis, it was interesting that more than 80% of marketers surveyed indicated that their marketing budgets would either stay the same or increase over the next year, with credit unions having a slightly lower likelihood of having their budgets cut this year.

Challenges and Priorities


As shown below, all classes of organizations indicated the expectation of a resource constraint challenge in 2012 (despite equal or higher budgets), yet that is where the similarities end between banks and credit unions. Banks indicated a significantly higher challenge due to the lack of trust in the banking industry, which credit unions have used to their advantage in the second half of 2011 and into this year. Banks also are much more challenged by the presence of silos within the organization as well as by regulatory and compliance issues that credit union marketers indicated. Interestingly, non-community banks seem to have it easier when it comes to getting employee support for programs initiated.

From a prioritization perspective, loan growth was less of a priority for larger banks than for credit unions, while the desire for checking and deposit growth was significantly more important. In addition, while cross-selling was an important mission for all classes of organizations, the importance of this goal was much greater for larger banks, with almost half of the banks ranking this as a top priority. Alternatively, none of the organization types ranked stemming attrition as a significant priority which is interesting given the cost of acquiring a new customer/member. Finally, credit unions seem to be much more focused on changing the demographic composition of their member base, putting a high priority on acquiring a younger clientele.

Product Emphasis

Reinforcing some of the findings above, credit unions will be focusing on virtually all types of loans in 2012, with a much higher emphasis on auto loans and credit cards than their larger bank counterparts. Not surprisingly, credit unions and community banks will also continue to market free checking accounts, while large banks will focus on fee-based checking. Finally, both community and larger banks will be focusing on small businesses this coming year, doubling the percentages found at credit unions.

Marketing and Media Tools

As noted in our original analysis, traditional marketing channels will continue to be used by all classes of organizations, with only print looking to have significant potential reductions based on our survey. As expected, banks and credit unions will be increasing their emphasis on digital and online marketing with onboarding programs also getting more attention across the board. Interestingly, there was virtually no statistically significant difference in the marketing tools that will be emphasized based on the type of organization for the coming year.

While most of the trends in use of online marketing tools by the different organizations were consistent, one of the most surprising findings as we analyzed the results by type of organization was the significantly higher use of social media and estatement advertising by credit unions compared to both community and larger banks. While this may change in the future, the ability to have front-runner status at this time may be advantageous for credit unions if their underlying strategies and measurement of results are sound.

Social Media Use

It appears the primary reason for the differentiation between banks and credit unions in the social media space is due to the much higher presence on Facebook by credit unions than by banks. Being local in nature, this makes sense to build this community following, but it will be interesting to see what is done with this channel and whether financial organizations are using this simply as a landing zone for members or if this channel becomes an effective marketing tool.

Bank Brand Loyalty Tested With Every Move

When it comes to lifestage marketing events, new movers have always represented a significant opportunity and risk. This is because consumers who move tend to significantly increase spending in a variety of categories while also changing their brand loyalties as to where they shop, eat, buy personal services and even bank. 

But, with new home sales in 2011 being 80 percent below the peak in 2005 (making the number of existing and new home sales the lowest in almost two decades), should bank marketers still invest in this target audience? Do consumers still spend at the same rate as in the past? Is this target audience even scaleable?

Interestingly, despite the ongoing reduction in home sales, the number of people moving has steadily increased since mid 2009, indicating that consumers in transition still represent both a risk and opportunity for marketers. In fact, the New Mover Report 2012 from Epsilon found that consumers continue to spend thousands of dollars in the months following a move, representing a valuable opportunity for those marketers who can identify and effectively communicate to new movers. 

The study also found three major themes when they looked at consumer spending habits, brand affinity and channel preferences associated with a move from one location to another:

• Consumer brand loyalty is tested during a move, with new movers being twice as likely to change brands or service providers than non-movers.
• New movers have an interest in changing and/or upgrading services such as banking, credit cards and insurance after a move.
• Direct mail continues to be a highly valued channel for receiving information during a move, and is even highly valued by Gen Y consumers.

New Movers and Home Purchasers are Not Synonymous

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, roughly 17% of Americans move each year, representing more than 53 million people. Those who move tend to be younger, with the distance of the move also being greater for younger demographic segments. The only exception being those households reaching retirement (around age 65) who also are more likely to move. 

Research shows that while the economy is showing signs of slow and steady recovery, the volume of home sales continues to lag behind the highs achieved in the past. As a result, the ratio of renters on the move versus new homeowners continues to favor renters as it did in 2011. While this trend is not necessarily surprising given the scope of the housing market difficulties, marketers need to understand the difference between these two segments of movers as it relates to demographics, loyalty and purchasing behavior. The good news is that both new movers and home purchasers appear to be on the upswing.

The bad news is that as many as 33% of the people who move do not report their new address to the USPS (the central compiler of the National Change of Address (NCOA) file. As a result, targeting new movers (or even keeping a house file current) requires compiling multiple list sources including utility connections, phone changes, county records, etc.

Do Households on the Move Remain Brand Loyal?

Research shows that even when a household moves a short distance, marketers can't assume purchasing patterns will remain the same. According to the research done by Epsilon, brand loyalty is tested during a move, with the frequency of changing providers/brands being twice as likely for a new mover compared to a non-mover (some categories of services have a much higher propensity of change).

As shown below, some of the lowest levels of loyalty were in the category of professional services, where the difference in likelihood of changing brands between movers and non-movers were greatest for home insurance (3:1), auto insurance (2:1), credit cards (2:1), and banking accounts (3:1).

While a move, by itself, may not prompt a change in providers, it does appear to put loyalty to a specific brand or provider in play which indicates a defection risk for current customers and acquisition opportunity for prospects in a trade area.

When the research dug deeper into the reason for why movers changed brands, the overwhelming reason for change in the professional services category was the move itself (63%) compared to pricing (40%), service (19%) or any other feature/benefit offered.

Finally, beyond changing brands, new movers were also more likely to acquire or upgrade products and services in the professional services category. As was the case for the reason why movers switched brands, new movers indicated that the move itself as a major reason for acquiring or upgrading a professional service (59%), with pricing again being important but taking a back seat as a reason for upgrading (39%). 

What Communication Channel(s) are Best?

As consumers use more and more channels to shop and buy services, it should be no surprise that a multichannel approach is recommended to connect with new movers related to retaining or acquiring households on the move. While there is very little disparity between the preferred channel of communication between movers and non-movers, word of mouth (referrals), email and direct mail are the channels most often mentioned as the way households want to learn about products and services. 

It should be noted that recent research indicates the desire for direct mail being even more pronounced for the marketing of financial services as discussed in a number of previous blog posts including As Channel Proliferation Increases, Consumers Still Prefer and Trust Direct Mail for Financial Services Communication (December, 2011). This study also indicated a higher preference for direct mail among Gen Y consumers than for any other channel.

And while there is always a great deal of buzz among marketers around the use of social media, this channel is the least desired by both movers and non-movers. That said, social media should still be integrated as part of a marketing strategy since targeting new movers using social media will be much easier than with other channels such as mass media and email (due to list availability and accuracy).

Key Take-Aways for Marketers

As I mentioned in my previous post on the subject, Targeting New Movers for Enhanced Growth (February, 2010), the keys to reaching this transitional segment include:

• Be the first in the mailbox (or on the computer, phone or newspaper box) after a household moves to avoid clutter and benefit from early decisions
• Develop a system of immediate processing of prospects/customers to provide the foundation for being the first to reach the new mover in your category
• Measure the incremental impact of the program against your alternative acquisition/retention initiatives

For the majority of my clients, a new mover program is the foundation of their acquisition efforts, generating one of the strongest returns on investment and a steady flow of new households at a time when market growth is at a premium. In addition, a physical convenience is becoming less important for households, more and more of my clients are looking for ways to identify current customers who may be preparing for (or have just completed) a move to protect this household from attrition.

According to Don Hinman, SVP of Data Strategy at Epsilon, "An average household moves every five years on average and spends approximately $9,000 on a broad array of goods and services. By understanding at a deep level where new movers are spending and what opportunities are available to gain share of wallet, brands can create more effective, targeted campaigns to reach consumers during this transition."

The 2012 New Mover Report can be downloaded free of charge here.

Additional Insights:

U.S. Census Bureau Geographic Mobility/Migration Tables - December 2012